* Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] tools: gpio: use strscpy() for consumer name
[not found] ` <20260504075036.12190-1-zxl434815272@gmail.com>
@ 2026-05-04 12:45 ` David Laight
2026-05-07 0:02 ` 007
[not found] ` <20260504075036.12190-2-zxl434815272@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20260504075036.12190-3-zxl434815272@gmail.com>
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Laight @ 2026-05-04 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang Xiaolei; +Cc: linux-gpio, brgl, warthog618, linux-kernel
On Mon, 4 May 2026 15:50:34 +0800
Zhang Xiaolei <zxl434815272@gmail.com> wrote:
> Replace strcpy() with strscpy() to avoid potential buffer overflow
> when copying the consumer string.
You ought to run code before submitting patches.
This wasn't even compiled.
-- David
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiaolei <zxl434815272@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c b/tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c
> index 4096bcd511d1..176bccfcccb0 100644
> --- a/tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c
> +++ b/tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ int gpiotools_request_line(const char *device_name, unsigned int *lines,
> req.offsets[i] = lines[i];
>
> req.config = *config;
> - strcpy(req.consumer, consumer);
> + strcpy(req.consumer, consumer, sizeof(req.consumer));
> req.num_lines = num_lines;
>
> ret = ioctl(fd, GPIO_V2_GET_LINE_IOCTL, &req);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] tools: gpio: validate arguments in gpiotools_request_line
[not found] ` <20260504075036.12190-2-zxl434815272@gmail.com>
@ 2026-05-04 16:13 ` Maxwell Doose
2026-05-07 0:04 ` 007
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Maxwell Doose @ 2026-05-04 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang Xiaolei; +Cc: linux-gpio, brgl, warthog618, linux-kernel
On Mon, May 4, 2026 at 2:56 AM Zhang Xiaolei <zxl434815272@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Add validation for input pointers and number of lines.
>
Perhaps make the commit message more descriptive?
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiaolei <zxl434815272@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c b/tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c
> index 176bccfcccb0..930a38fe7911 100644
> --- a/tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c
> +++ b/tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c
> @@ -65,6 +65,12 @@ int gpiotools_request_line(const char *device_name, unsigned int *lines,
> int i;
> int ret;
>
> + if (!device_name || !lines || !config || !consumer || !num_lines)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (num_lines > GPIO_V2_LINES_MAX)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
I'm wondering if we might want to use ERANGE here for the num_lines >
GPIO_V2_LINES_MAX check instead of EINVAL.
best regards,
maxwell
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] tools: gpio: fix ioctl name in error message
[not found] ` <20260504075036.12190-3-zxl434815272@gmail.com>
@ 2026-05-04 17:47 ` Maxwell Doose
2026-05-07 0:03 ` 007
2026-05-07 0:41 ` [PATCH v3] " Zhang Xiaolei
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Maxwell Doose @ 2026-05-04 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang Xiaolei; +Cc: linux-gpio, brgl, warthog618, linux-kernel
Hi Zhang,
On Mon, May 4, 2026 at 2:56 AM Zhang Xiaolei <zxl434815272@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Use the correct ioctl name in the error message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiaolei <zxl434815272@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
[snip]
Patch looks technically good but when I meant split these patches I
meant into entirely separate patches. Please split this away from the
patch series.
best regards,
max
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] tools: gpio: use strscpy() for consumer name
2026-05-04 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] tools: gpio: use strscpy() for consumer name David Laight
@ 2026-05-07 0:02 ` 007
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: 007 @ 2026-05-07 0:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Laight; +Cc: linux-gpio, brgl, warthog618, linux-kernel
OK, I will check it next time, thanks for the reminder.
Best regards
Zhang Xiaolei
On 5/4/26 20:45, David Laight wrote:
> On Mon, 4 May 2026 15:50:34 +0800
> Zhang Xiaolei <zxl434815272@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Replace strcpy() with strscpy() to avoid potential buffer overflow
>> when copying the consumer string.
> You ought to run code before submitting patches.
> This wasn't even compiled.
>
> -- David
>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiaolei <zxl434815272@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c b/tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c
>> index 4096bcd511d1..176bccfcccb0 100644
>> --- a/tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c
>> +++ b/tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c
>> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ int gpiotools_request_line(const char *device_name, unsigned int *lines,
>> req.offsets[i] = lines[i];
>>
>> req.config = *config;
>> - strcpy(req.consumer, consumer);
>> + strcpy(req.consumer, consumer, sizeof(req.consumer));
>> req.num_lines = num_lines;
>>
>> ret = ioctl(fd, GPIO_V2_GET_LINE_IOCTL, &req);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] tools: gpio: fix ioctl name in error message
2026-05-04 17:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] tools: gpio: fix ioctl name in error message Maxwell Doose
@ 2026-05-07 0:03 ` 007
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: 007 @ 2026-05-07 0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maxwell Doose; +Cc: linux-gpio, brgl, warthog618, linux-kernel
Hi, bro, I will redo it, thanks for the reminder.
Best regards
Zhang Xiaolei
On 5/5/26 01:47, Maxwell Doose wrote:
> Hi Zhang,
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2026 at 2:56 AM Zhang Xiaolei <zxl434815272@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Use the correct ioctl name in the error message.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiaolei <zxl434815272@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
> [snip]
>
> Patch looks technically good but when I meant split these patches I
> meant into entirely separate patches. Please split this away from the
> patch series.
>
> best regards,
> max
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] tools: gpio: validate arguments in gpiotools_request_line
2026-05-04 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] tools: gpio: validate arguments in gpiotools_request_line Maxwell Doose
@ 2026-05-07 0:04 ` 007
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: 007 @ 2026-05-07 0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maxwell Doose; +Cc: linux-gpio, brgl, warthog618, linux-kernel
OK, I will redo it, thanks.
Best regards,
Zhang Xiaolei
On 5/5/26 00:13, Maxwell Doose wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2026 at 2:56 AM Zhang Xiaolei <zxl434815272@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Add validation for input pointers and number of lines.
>>
> Perhaps make the commit message more descriptive?
>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiaolei <zxl434815272@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c b/tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c
>> index 176bccfcccb0..930a38fe7911 100644
>> --- a/tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c
>> +++ b/tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c
>> @@ -65,6 +65,12 @@ int gpiotools_request_line(const char *device_name, unsigned int *lines,
>> int i;
>> int ret;
>>
>> + if (!device_name || !lines || !config || !consumer || !num_lines)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (num_lines > GPIO_V2_LINES_MAX)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
> I'm wondering if we might want to use ERANGE here for the num_lines >
> GPIO_V2_LINES_MAX check instead of EINVAL.
>
> best regards,
> maxwell
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3] tools: gpio: fix ioctl name in error message
[not found] ` <20260504075036.12190-3-zxl434815272@gmail.com>
2026-05-04 17:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] tools: gpio: fix ioctl name in error message Maxwell Doose
@ 2026-05-07 0:41 ` Zhang Xiaolei
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Xiaolei @ 2026-05-07 0:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-gpio; +Cc: brgl, warthog618, linux-kernel, Zhang Xiaolei
Use the correct ioctl name in the error message.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiaolei <zxl434815272@gmail.com>
---
tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c b/tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c
index 930a38fe7911..0d52d58cc6b6 100644
--- a/tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c
+++ b/tools/gpio/gpio-utils.c
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ int gpiotools_request_line(const char *device_name, unsigned int *lines,
if (ret == -1) {
ret = -errno;
fprintf(stderr, "Failed to issue %s (%d), %s\n",
- "GPIO_GET_LINE_IOCTL", ret, strerror(errno));
+ "GPIO_V2_GET_LINE_IOCTL", ret, strerror(errno));
}
if (close(fd) == -1)
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-07 0:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20260503190016.13439-1-zxl434815272@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20260504075036.12190-1-zxl434815272@gmail.com>
2026-05-04 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] tools: gpio: use strscpy() for consumer name David Laight
2026-05-07 0:02 ` 007
[not found] ` <20260504075036.12190-2-zxl434815272@gmail.com>
2026-05-04 16:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] tools: gpio: validate arguments in gpiotools_request_line Maxwell Doose
2026-05-07 0:04 ` 007
[not found] ` <20260504075036.12190-3-zxl434815272@gmail.com>
2026-05-04 17:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] tools: gpio: fix ioctl name in error message Maxwell Doose
2026-05-07 0:03 ` 007
2026-05-07 0:41 ` [PATCH v3] " Zhang Xiaolei
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox