From: Linu Cherian <linu.cherian@arm.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/13] arm64: mm: Re-implement the __tlbi_level macro as a C function
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 11:00:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aVtMdh7nTtc7NhqG@a079125.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251216144601.2106412-2-ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Ryan,
On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 02:45:46PM +0000, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> As part of efforts to reduce our reliance on complex preprocessor macros
> for TLB invalidation routines, convert the __tlbi_level macro to a C
> function for by-level TLB invalidation.
>
> Each specific tlbi level op is implemented as a C function and the
> appropriate function pointer is passed to __tlbi_level(). Since
> everything is declared inline and is statically resolvable, the compiler
> will convert the indirect function call to a direct inline execution.
>
> Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> index a2d65d7d6aae..13a59cf28943 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> @@ -105,19 +105,62 @@ static inline unsigned long get_trans_granule(void)
>
> #define TLBI_TTL_UNKNOWN INT_MAX
>
> -#define __tlbi_level(op, addr, level) do { \
> - u64 arg = addr; \
> - \
> - if (alternative_has_cap_unlikely(ARM64_HAS_ARMv8_4_TTL) && \
> - level >= 0 && level <= 3) { \
> - u64 ttl = level & 3; \
> - ttl |= get_trans_granule() << 2; \
> - arg &= ~TLBI_TTL_MASK; \
> - arg |= FIELD_PREP(TLBI_TTL_MASK, ttl); \
> - } \
> - \
> - __tlbi(op, arg); \
> -} while(0)
> +typedef void (*tlbi_op)(u64 arg);
> +
> +static __always_inline void vae1is(u64 arg)
> +{
> + __tlbi(vae1is, arg);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void vae2is(u64 arg)
> +{
> + __tlbi(vae2is, arg);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void vale1(u64 arg)
> +{
> + __tlbi(vale1, arg);
> + __tlbi_user(vale1, arg);
Should the __tlbi_user addition be added as part of patch 3 ?
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void vale1is(u64 arg)
> +{
> + __tlbi(vale1is, arg);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void vale2is(u64 arg)
> +{
> + __tlbi(vale2is, arg);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void vaale1is(u64 arg)
> +{
> + __tlbi(vaale1is, arg);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void ipas2e1(u64 arg)
> +{
> + __tlbi(ipas2e1, arg);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void ipas2e1is(u64 arg)
> +{
> + __tlbi(ipas2e1is, arg);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void __tlbi_level(tlbi_op op, u64 addr, u32 level)
> +{
> + u64 arg = addr;
> +
> + if (alternative_has_cap_unlikely(ARM64_HAS_ARMv8_4_TTL) && level <= 3) {
> + u64 ttl = level | (get_trans_granule() << 2);
> +
> + arg &= ~TLBI_TTL_MASK;
> + arg |= FIELD_PREP(TLBI_TTL_MASK, ttl);
> + }
> +
> + op(arg);
> +}
>
> #define __tlbi_user_level(op, arg, level) do { \
> if (arm64_kernel_unmapped_at_el0()) \
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-05 5:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-16 14:45 [PATCH v1 00/13] arm64: Refactor TLB invalidation API and implementation Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 01/13] arm64: mm: Re-implement the __tlbi_level macro as a C function Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 17:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-02 14:18 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-05 5:30 ` Linu Cherian [this message]
2026-01-05 17:09 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 02/13] arm64: mm: Introduce a C wrapper for by-range TLB invalidation Ryan Roberts
2026-01-05 5:33 ` Linu Cherian
2026-01-05 17:12 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 03/13] arm64: mm: Implicitly invalidate user ASID based on TLBI operation Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 18:01 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-02 14:20 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-18 6:30 ` Linu Cherian
2025-12-18 7:05 ` Linu Cherian
2025-12-18 15:47 ` Linu Cherian
2026-01-02 14:30 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-05 13:03 ` Linu Cherian
2026-01-05 5:34 ` Linu Cherian
2026-01-05 17:13 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 04/13] arm64: mm: Push __TLBI_VADDR() into __tlbi_level() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-05 5:35 ` Linu Cherian
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 05/13] arm64: mm: Inline __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE() into __tlbi_range() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-05 5:35 ` Linu Cherian
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 06/13] arm64: mm: Re-implement the __flush_tlb_range_op macro in C Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 07/13] arm64: mm: Simplify __TLBI_RANGE_NUM() macro Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 08/13] arm64: mm: Simplify __flush_tlb_range_limit_excess() Ryan Roberts
2025-12-17 8:12 ` Dev Jain
2026-01-02 15:23 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 09/13] arm64: mm: Refactor flush_tlb_page() to use __tlbi_level_asid() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-06 3:25 ` Linu Cherian
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 10/13] arm64: mm: Refactor __flush_tlb_range() to take flags Ryan Roberts
2026-01-06 4:51 ` Linu Cherian
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 11/13] arm64: mm: More flags for __flush_tlb_range() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-06 15:28 ` Linu Cherian
2026-01-12 11:52 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-07 3:21 ` Linu Cherian
2026-01-12 12:00 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 12/13] arm64: mm: Wrap flush_tlb_page() around ___flush_tlb_range() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-07 9:57 ` Linu Cherian
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 13/13] arm64: mm: Provide level hint for flush_tlb_page() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-07 14:44 ` Linu Cherian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aVtMdh7nTtc7NhqG@a079125.arm.com \
--to=linu.cherian@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox