From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Linu Cherian <linu.cherian@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/13] arm64: mm: Implicitly invalidate user ASID based on TLBI operation
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 17:13:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e41f0f57-bf39-45ac-9995-5a90b3d8a3cb@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aVtNXhd1VRfktfAx@a079125.arm.com>
On 05/01/2026 05:34, Linu Cherian wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 02:45:48PM +0000, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> When kpti is enabled, separate ASIDs are used for userspace and
>> kernelspace, requiring ASID-qualified TLB invalidation by virtual
>> address to invalidate both of them.
>>
>> Push the logic for invalidating the two ASIDs down into the low-level
>> tlbi-op-specific functions and remove the burden from the caller to
>> handle the kpti-specific behaviour.
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 27 ++++++++++-----------------
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
>> index c5111d2afc66..31f43d953ce2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
>> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ typedef void (*tlbi_op)(u64 arg);
>> static __always_inline void vae1is(u64 arg)
>> {
>> __tlbi(vae1is, arg);
>> + __tlbi_user(vae1is, arg);
>> }
>>
>> static __always_inline void vae2is(u64 arg)
>> @@ -126,6 +127,7 @@ static __always_inline void vale1(u64 arg)
>> static __always_inline void vale1is(u64 arg)
>> {
>> __tlbi(vale1is, arg);
>> + __tlbi_user(vale1is, arg);
>> }
>>
>> static __always_inline void vale2is(u64 arg)
>> @@ -162,11 +164,6 @@ static __always_inline void __tlbi_level(tlbi_op op, u64 addr, u32 level)
>> op(arg);
>> }
>>
>> -#define __tlbi_user_level(op, arg, level) do { \
>> - if (arm64_kernel_unmapped_at_el0()) \
>> - __tlbi_level(op, (arg | USER_ASID_FLAG), level); \
>> -} while (0)
>> -
>> /*
>> * This macro creates a properly formatted VA operand for the TLB RANGE. The
>> * value bit assignments are:
>> @@ -435,8 +432,6 @@ static inline void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
>> * @stride: Flush granularity
>> * @asid: The ASID of the task (0 for IPA instructions)
>> * @tlb_level: Translation Table level hint, if known
>> - * @tlbi_user: If 'true', call an additional __tlbi_user()
>> - * (typically for user ASIDs). 'flase' for IPA instructions
>> * @lpa2: If 'true', the lpa2 scheme is used as set out below
>> *
>> * When the CPU does not support TLB range operations, flush the TLB
>> @@ -462,6 +457,7 @@ static inline void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
>> static __always_inline void rvae1is(u64 arg)
>> {
>> __tlbi(rvae1is, arg);
>> + __tlbi_user(rvae1is, arg);
>> }
>>
>> static __always_inline void rvale1(u64 arg)
>> @@ -473,6 +469,7 @@ static __always_inline void rvale1(u64 arg)
>> static __always_inline void rvale1is(u64 arg)
>> {
>> __tlbi(rvale1is, arg);
>> + __tlbi_user(rvale1is, arg);
>> }
>>
>> static __always_inline void rvaale1is(u64 arg)
>> @@ -491,7 +488,7 @@ static __always_inline void __tlbi_range(tlbi_op op, u64 arg)
>> }
>>
>> #define __flush_tlb_range_op(op, start, pages, stride, \
>> - asid, tlb_level, tlbi_user, lpa2) \
>> + asid, tlb_level, lpa2) \
>> do { \
>> typeof(start) __flush_start = start; \
>> typeof(pages) __flush_pages = pages; \
>> @@ -506,8 +503,6 @@ do { \
>> (lpa2 && __flush_start != ALIGN(__flush_start, SZ_64K))) { \
>> addr = __TLBI_VADDR(__flush_start, asid); \
>> __tlbi_level(op, addr, tlb_level); \
>> - if (tlbi_user) \
>> - __tlbi_user_level(op, addr, tlb_level); \
>> __flush_start += stride; \
>> __flush_pages -= stride >> PAGE_SHIFT; \
>> continue; \
>> @@ -518,8 +513,6 @@ do { \
>> addr = __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE(__flush_start >> shift, asid, \
>> scale, num, tlb_level); \
>> __tlbi_range(r##op, addr); \
>> - if (tlbi_user) \
>> - __tlbi_user(r##op, addr); \
>> __flush_start += __TLBI_RANGE_PAGES(num, scale) << PAGE_SHIFT; \
>> __flush_pages -= __TLBI_RANGE_PAGES(num, scale);\
>> } \
>> @@ -528,7 +521,7 @@ do { \
>> } while (0)
>>
>> #define __flush_s2_tlb_range_op(op, start, pages, stride, tlb_level) \
>> - __flush_tlb_range_op(op, start, pages, stride, 0, tlb_level, false, kvm_lpa2_is_enabled());
>> + __flush_tlb_range_op(op, start, pages, stride, 0, tlb_level, kvm_lpa2_is_enabled());
>>
>> static inline bool __flush_tlb_range_limit_excess(unsigned long start,
>> unsigned long end, unsigned long pages, unsigned long stride)
>> @@ -568,10 +561,10 @@ static inline void __flush_tlb_range_nosync(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>
>> if (last_level)
>> __flush_tlb_range_op(vale1is, start, pages, stride, asid,
>> - tlb_level, true, lpa2_is_enabled());
>> + tlb_level, lpa2_is_enabled());
>> else
>> __flush_tlb_range_op(vae1is, start, pages, stride, asid,
>> - tlb_level, true, lpa2_is_enabled());
>> + tlb_level, lpa2_is_enabled());
>>
>> mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(mm, start, end);
>> }
>> @@ -630,7 +623,7 @@ static inline void flush_tlb_kernel_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end
>>
>> dsb(ishst);
>> __flush_tlb_range_op(vaale1is, start, pages, stride, 0,
>> - TLBI_TTL_UNKNOWN, false, lpa2_is_enabled());
>> + TLBI_TTL_UNKNOWN, lpa2_is_enabled());
>> dsb(ish);
>> isb();
>
>
>
> __flush_tlb_range_op call in local_flush_tlb_contpte is missed out.
Thanks; this is part of my botched rebase. I'll fix it in the next rev.
>
>
> --
> Linu Cherian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-05 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-16 14:45 [PATCH v1 00/13] arm64: Refactor TLB invalidation API and implementation Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 01/13] arm64: mm: Re-implement the __tlbi_level macro as a C function Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 17:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-02 14:18 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-05 5:30 ` Linu Cherian
2026-01-05 17:09 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 02/13] arm64: mm: Introduce a C wrapper for by-range TLB invalidation Ryan Roberts
2026-01-05 5:33 ` Linu Cherian
2026-01-05 17:12 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 03/13] arm64: mm: Implicitly invalidate user ASID based on TLBI operation Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 18:01 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-02 14:20 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-18 6:30 ` Linu Cherian
2025-12-18 7:05 ` Linu Cherian
2025-12-18 15:47 ` Linu Cherian
2026-01-02 14:30 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-05 13:03 ` Linu Cherian
2026-01-05 5:34 ` Linu Cherian
2026-01-05 17:13 ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 04/13] arm64: mm: Push __TLBI_VADDR() into __tlbi_level() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-05 5:35 ` Linu Cherian
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 05/13] arm64: mm: Inline __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE() into __tlbi_range() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-05 5:35 ` Linu Cherian
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 06/13] arm64: mm: Re-implement the __flush_tlb_range_op macro in C Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 07/13] arm64: mm: Simplify __TLBI_RANGE_NUM() macro Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 08/13] arm64: mm: Simplify __flush_tlb_range_limit_excess() Ryan Roberts
2025-12-17 8:12 ` Dev Jain
2026-01-02 15:23 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 09/13] arm64: mm: Refactor flush_tlb_page() to use __tlbi_level_asid() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-06 3:25 ` Linu Cherian
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 10/13] arm64: mm: Refactor __flush_tlb_range() to take flags Ryan Roberts
2026-01-06 4:51 ` Linu Cherian
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 11/13] arm64: mm: More flags for __flush_tlb_range() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-06 15:28 ` Linu Cherian
2026-01-12 11:52 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-07 3:21 ` Linu Cherian
2026-01-12 12:00 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 12/13] arm64: mm: Wrap flush_tlb_page() around ___flush_tlb_range() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-07 9:57 ` Linu Cherian
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 13/13] arm64: mm: Provide level hint for flush_tlb_page() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-07 14:44 ` Linu Cherian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e41f0f57-bf39-45ac-9995-5a90b3d8a3cb@arm.com \
--to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=linu.cherian@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox