From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Linu Cherian <linu.cherian@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/13] arm64: mm: Introduce a C wrapper for by-range TLB invalidation
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 17:12:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b098b6ba-74b7-4e2e-bc3e-a417f921c782@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aVtNLmXgaxwPXG6q@a079125.arm.com>
On 05/01/2026 05:33, Linu Cherian wrote:
> Ryan,
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 02:45:47PM +0000, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> As part of efforts to reduce our reliance on complex preprocessor macros
>> for TLB invalidation routines, introduce a new C wrapper for by-range
>> TLB invalidation which can be used instead of the __tlbi() macro and can
>> additionally be called from C code.
>>
>> Each specific tlbi range op is implemented as a C function and the
>> appropriate function pointer is passed to __tlbi_range(). Since
>> everything is declared inline and is statically resolvable, the compiler
>> will convert the indirect function call to a direct inline execution.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
>> index 13a59cf28943..c5111d2afc66 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
>> @@ -459,6 +459,37 @@ static inline void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
>> * operations can only span an even number of pages. We save this for last to
>> * ensure 64KB start alignment is maintained for the LPA2 case.
>> */
>> +static __always_inline void rvae1is(u64 arg)
>> +{
>> + __tlbi(rvae1is, arg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static __always_inline void rvale1(u64 arg)
>> +{
>> + __tlbi(rvale1, arg);
>> + __tlbi_user(rvale1, arg);
>
> Should this __tlbi_user be added as part of patch 3 ?
Yes! I've screwed up a rebase since vale1/rvale1 only started being used in
v6.19-rc1; I attempted to add it incrementally and have clearly screwed it up.
I'll fix it all in the next rev.
Thanks,
Ryan
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static __always_inline void rvale1is(u64 arg)
>> +{
>> + __tlbi(rvale1is, arg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static __always_inline void rvaale1is(u64 arg)
>> +{
>> + __tlbi(rvaale1is, arg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static __always_inline void ripas2e1is(u64 arg)
>> +{
>> + __tlbi(ripas2e1is, arg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static __always_inline void __tlbi_range(tlbi_op op, u64 arg)
>> +{
>> + op(arg);
>> +}
>> +
>> #define __flush_tlb_range_op(op, start, pages, stride, \
>> asid, tlb_level, tlbi_user, lpa2) \
>> do { \
>> @@ -486,7 +517,7 @@ do { \
>> if (num >= 0) { \
>> addr = __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE(__flush_start >> shift, asid, \
>> scale, num, tlb_level); \
>> - __tlbi(r##op, addr); \
>> + __tlbi_range(r##op, addr); \
>> if (tlbi_user) \
>> __tlbi_user(r##op, addr); \
>> __flush_start += __TLBI_RANGE_PAGES(num, scale) << PAGE_SHIFT; \
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-05 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-16 14:45 [PATCH v1 00/13] arm64: Refactor TLB invalidation API and implementation Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 01/13] arm64: mm: Re-implement the __tlbi_level macro as a C function Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 17:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-02 14:18 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-05 5:30 ` Linu Cherian
2026-01-05 17:09 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 02/13] arm64: mm: Introduce a C wrapper for by-range TLB invalidation Ryan Roberts
2026-01-05 5:33 ` Linu Cherian
2026-01-05 17:12 ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 03/13] arm64: mm: Implicitly invalidate user ASID based on TLBI operation Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 18:01 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-02 14:20 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-18 6:30 ` Linu Cherian
2025-12-18 7:05 ` Linu Cherian
2025-12-18 15:47 ` Linu Cherian
2026-01-02 14:30 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-05 13:03 ` Linu Cherian
2026-01-05 5:34 ` Linu Cherian
2026-01-05 17:13 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 04/13] arm64: mm: Push __TLBI_VADDR() into __tlbi_level() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-05 5:35 ` Linu Cherian
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 05/13] arm64: mm: Inline __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE() into __tlbi_range() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-05 5:35 ` Linu Cherian
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 06/13] arm64: mm: Re-implement the __flush_tlb_range_op macro in C Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 07/13] arm64: mm: Simplify __TLBI_RANGE_NUM() macro Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 08/13] arm64: mm: Simplify __flush_tlb_range_limit_excess() Ryan Roberts
2025-12-17 8:12 ` Dev Jain
2026-01-02 15:23 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 09/13] arm64: mm: Refactor flush_tlb_page() to use __tlbi_level_asid() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-06 3:25 ` Linu Cherian
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 10/13] arm64: mm: Refactor __flush_tlb_range() to take flags Ryan Roberts
2026-01-06 4:51 ` Linu Cherian
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 11/13] arm64: mm: More flags for __flush_tlb_range() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-06 15:28 ` Linu Cherian
2026-01-12 11:52 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-07 3:21 ` Linu Cherian
2026-01-12 12:00 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 12/13] arm64: mm: Wrap flush_tlb_page() around ___flush_tlb_range() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-07 9:57 ` Linu Cherian
2025-12-16 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 13/13] arm64: mm: Provide level hint for flush_tlb_page() Ryan Roberts
2026-01-07 14:44 ` Linu Cherian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b098b6ba-74b7-4e2e-bc3e-a417f921c782@arm.com \
--to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=linu.cherian@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox