Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: qcom: Add device tree for Nord SoC series

Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: qcom: Add device tree for Nord SoC series

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 09:09:25PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 09:28:47AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 28/04/2026 09:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 10:34:52AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> ...
> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/nord.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/nord.dtsi
[..]
> > >> +			compatible = "qcom,oryon-1-5";
> > > 
> > > I asked you to send this binding WITH the user, because they go via
> > > the same tree. I see the user, but no binding for it in the patchset.
> > 
> > And few others like SCM are also missing. I am talking about this many
> > times already, to multiple vendors, and I am still surprised why people
> > on purpose give more work to the maintainer. Well, not my tree, so not
> > my work, but if you ever wonder why your patches are not applied for
> > longer time, that could be one of the reasons.
> 
> Yes, I should have sent all those bindings targeting Bjorn as part of
> this series to make it easier for Bjorn.  But I'm not sure cpus.yaml
> change is one of them, as I'm sending it to Rob.
> 

Not sure if you have settled this by now, but I can merge such binding
change together with the dts change.

Regards,
Bjorn

Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: qcom: Add device tree for Nord SoC series

[Shawn Guo]

On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 08:12:01PM -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 09:09:25PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 09:28:47AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 28/04/2026 09:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 10:34:52AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > ...
> > > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/nord.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/nord.dtsi
> [..]
> > > >> +			compatible = "qcom,oryon-1-5";
> > > > 
> > > > I asked you to send this binding WITH the user, because they go via
> > > > the same tree. I see the user, but no binding for it in the patchset.
> > > 
> > > And few others like SCM are also missing. I am talking about this many
> > > times already, to multiple vendors, and I am still surprised why people
> > > on purpose give more work to the maintainer. Well, not my tree, so not
> > > my work, but if you ever wonder why your patches are not applied for
> > > longer time, that could be one of the reasons.
> > 
> > Yes, I should have sent all those bindings targeting Bjorn as part of
> > this series to make it easier for Bjorn.  But I'm not sure cpus.yaml
> > change is one of them, as I'm sending it to Rob.
> > 
> 
> Not sure if you have settled this by now, but I can merge such binding
> change together with the dts change.

Thank you for the offering, Bjorn!

I will include it into dts series if Rob hasn't picked it up when v2
of dts is ready for posting.

Shawn

Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: qcom: Add device tree for Nord SoC series

[Shawn Guo]

On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 09:24:19AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 08:12:01PM -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 09:09:25PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 09:28:47AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > > On 28/04/2026 09:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 10:34:52AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/nord.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/nord.dtsi
> > [..]
> > > > >> +			compatible = "qcom,oryon-1-5";
> > > > > 
> > > > > I asked you to send this binding WITH the user, because they go via
> > > > > the same tree. I see the user, but no binding for it in the patchset.
> > > > 
> > > > And few others like SCM are also missing. I am talking about this many
> > > > times already, to multiple vendors, and I am still surprised why people
> > > > on purpose give more work to the maintainer. Well, not my tree, so not
> > > > my work, but if you ever wonder why your patches are not applied for
> > > > longer time, that could be one of the reasons.
> > > 
> > > Yes, I should have sent all those bindings targeting Bjorn as part of
> > > this series to make it easier for Bjorn.  But I'm not sure cpus.yaml
> > > change is one of them, as I'm sending it to Rob.
> > > 
> > 
> > Not sure if you have settled this by now, but I can merge such binding
> > change together with the dts change.
> 
> Thank you for the offering, Bjorn!
> 
> I will include it into dts series if Rob hasn't picked it up when v2
> of dts is ready for posting.

I'm currently targeting PDC binding to Rob. Is that something you can
merge together with dts as well?

Shawn

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260504080703.825328-1-shengchao.guo@oss.qualcomm.com/