The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>
To: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/cpu/intel: Don't clear X86_BUG_F00F before setting it
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 21:16:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <agdw87wwbmqku0Ym@lx-t490> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260515002500.2463393-2-sohil.mehta@intel.com>

On Thu, 14 May 2026, Sohil Mehta wrote:
>
> From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
>
> On x86 SMP systems with the F00F bug present, the following warning
> occurs for each AP:
>
>   WARNING: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c:126 at do_clear_cpu_cap+0xb4/0x110
>   Call Trace:
>    clear_cpu_cap+0x8/0x10
>    init_intel+0x1b/0x4b0
>    identify_cpu+0x154/0x750
>    identify_secondary_cpu+0x3d/0x90
>    start_secondary+0x6b/0xf0
>    startup_32_smp+0x151/0x160
>
> The X86_BUG_F00F CPU feature is first cleared in intel_workarounds() and
> then set for the affected models. This sequence works fine on the BSP
> but on AP bringup, where alternatives have already been patched,
> clearing the flag triggers the warning.
>
> There is no technical reason for clearing the flag before setting it.
> It is mainly an artifact of the introduction of X86_BUG_F00F in commit
> e2604b49e8a8 ("x86, cpu: Convert F00F bug detection"). Remove the
> unnecessary clearing of the flag.
>
> Note that the fixes tag references a recent commit that introduced the
> warning rather than the old commit that converted F00F bug detection to
> use clear_cpu_bug().
>
> Fixes: ee8962082a44 ("x86/alternatives: Catch late X86_FEATURE modifiers")
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
> [sohil: reworded commit message]
> Signed-off-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwi@linutronix.de>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-15 19:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-15  0:24 [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: Fix a F00F bug warning and cleanup surrounding code Sohil Mehta
2026-05-15  0:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/cpu/intel: Don't clear X86_BUG_F00F before setting it Sohil Mehta
2026-05-15 19:16   ` Ahmed S. Darwish [this message]
2026-05-15  0:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/cpu/intel: Simplify F00F bug notice using pr_notice_once() Sohil Mehta
2026-05-15 19:14   ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-05-15 22:37     ` Sohil Mehta
2026-05-15 23:09       ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-05-15 23:23     ` Dave Hansen
2026-05-15  0:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/cpufeature: Remove clear_cpu_bug() Sohil Mehta
2026-05-15 19:16   ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2026-05-15  6:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: Fix a F00F bug warning and cleanup surrounding code Richard Weinberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=agdw87wwbmqku0Ym@lx-t490 \
    --to=darwi@linutronix.de \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox