The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	 Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/10] crypto: safexcel - zeroize crypto_aes_ctx with __cleanup(aes_zeroize_ctx)
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 10:17:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <anRC5AYai6TVHcac@kwain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805115749.392672-11-thuth@redhat.com>

On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 01:57:48PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> 
> The code clears the crypto_aes_ctx in most cases already with
> memzero_explicit(), but safexcel_skcipher_aesxts_setkey() runs
> aes_expandkey() twice, and in case the second call fails, the
> context from the first call is leaked.
> 
> To fix this issue and to avoid future similar problems, let's use
> the new __cleanup(aes_zeroize_ctx) mechanism to make sure that we
> always clear the crypto_aes_ctx in all cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>

> ---
>  drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c | 13 ++++---------
>  drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c   |  3 +--
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c
> index e94686490bb27..50e8792b399de 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c
> @@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ static int safexcel_skcipher_aes_setkey(struct crypto_skcipher *ctfm,
>  	struct crypto_tfm *tfm = crypto_skcipher_tfm(ctfm);
>  	struct safexcel_cipher_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
>  	struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv = ctx->base.priv;
> -	struct crypto_aes_ctx aes;
> +	struct crypto_aes_ctx aes __cleanup(aes_zeroize_ctx);
>  	int ret, i;
>  
>  	ret = aes_expandkey(&aes, key, len);
> @@ -396,7 +396,6 @@ static int safexcel_skcipher_aes_setkey(struct crypto_skcipher *ctfm,
>  
>  	ctx->key_len = len;
>  
> -	memzero_explicit(&aes, sizeof(aes));
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1357,7 +1356,7 @@ static int safexcel_skcipher_aesctr_setkey(struct crypto_skcipher *ctfm,
>  	struct crypto_tfm *tfm = crypto_skcipher_tfm(ctfm);
>  	struct safexcel_cipher_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
>  	struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv = ctx->base.priv;
> -	struct crypto_aes_ctx aes;
> +	struct crypto_aes_ctx aes __cleanup(aes_zeroize_ctx);
>  	int ret, i;
>  	unsigned int keylen;
>  
> @@ -1383,7 +1382,6 @@ static int safexcel_skcipher_aesctr_setkey(struct crypto_skcipher *ctfm,
>  
>  	ctx->key_len = keylen;
>  
> -	memzero_explicit(&aes, sizeof(aes));
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -2537,7 +2535,7 @@ static int safexcel_skcipher_aesxts_setkey(struct crypto_skcipher *ctfm,
>  	struct crypto_tfm *tfm = crypto_skcipher_tfm(ctfm);
>  	struct safexcel_cipher_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
>  	struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv = ctx->base.priv;
> -	struct crypto_aes_ctx aes;
> +	struct crypto_aes_ctx aes __cleanup(aes_zeroize_ctx);
>  	int ret, i;
>  	unsigned int keylen;
>  
> @@ -2585,7 +2583,6 @@ static int safexcel_skcipher_aesxts_setkey(struct crypto_skcipher *ctfm,
>  
>  	ctx->key_len = keylen << 1;
>  
> -	memzero_explicit(&aes, sizeof(aes));
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -2751,12 +2748,11 @@ static int safexcel_aead_ccm_setkey(struct crypto_aead *ctfm, const u8 *key,
>  	struct crypto_tfm *tfm = crypto_aead_tfm(ctfm);
>  	struct safexcel_cipher_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
>  	struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv = ctx->base.priv;
> -	struct crypto_aes_ctx aes;
> +	struct crypto_aes_ctx aes __cleanup(aes_zeroize_ctx);
>  	int ret, i;
>  
>  	ret = aes_expandkey(&aes, key, len);
>  	if (ret) {
> -		memzero_explicit(&aes, sizeof(aes));
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -2785,7 +2781,6 @@ static int safexcel_aead_ccm_setkey(struct crypto_aead *ctfm, const u8 *key,
>  	else
>  		ctx->hash_alg = CONTEXT_CONTROL_CRYPTO_ALG_XCBC128;
>  
> -	memzero_explicit(&aes, sizeof(aes));
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c
> index 3402e570d045c..20c17eb09495e 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c
> @@ -1905,7 +1905,7 @@ static int safexcel_cbcmac_setkey(struct crypto_ahash *tfm, const u8 *key,
>  				 unsigned int len)
>  {
>  	struct safexcel_ahash_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(crypto_ahash_tfm(tfm));
> -	struct crypto_aes_ctx aes;
> +	struct crypto_aes_ctx aes __cleanup(aes_zeroize_ctx);
>  	int ret, i;
>  
>  	ret = aes_expandkey(&aes, key, len);
> @@ -1928,7 +1928,6 @@ static int safexcel_cbcmac_setkey(struct crypto_ahash *tfm, const u8 *key,
>  	}
>  	ctx->cbcmac  = true;
>  
> -	memzero_explicit(&aes, sizeof(aes));
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.55.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-06  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-05 11:57 [PATCH v3 00/10] crypto: Provide a function for zeroizing crypto_aes_ctx Thomas Huth
2026-08-05 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] crypto: Provide a wrapper " Thomas Huth
2026-08-05 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] crypto: aspeed - clear the crypto_aes_ctx when done Thomas Huth
2026-08-05 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] crypto: inside-secure/eip93 " Thomas Huth
2026-08-05 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] crypto: padlock-aes " Thomas Huth
2026-08-05 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] crypto: sa2ul " Thomas Huth
2026-08-05 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] crypto: arm/aes-neonbs " Thomas Huth
2026-08-05 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] crypto: arm64/aes-neonbs " Thomas Huth
2026-08-05 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] crypto: qat - zeroize crypto_aes_ctx with __cleanup(aes_zeroize_ctx) Thomas Huth
2026-08-05 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] crypto: safexcel - Rework cleanup of sensitive structs in safexcel_aead_setkey Thomas Huth
2026-08-06  8:10   ` Antoine Tenart
2026-08-06  8:18     ` Thomas Huth
2026-08-06 12:37       ` Antoine Tenart
2026-08-05 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] crypto: safexcel - zeroize crypto_aes_ctx with __cleanup(aes_zeroize_ctx) Thomas Huth
2026-08-06  8:17   ` Antoine Tenart [this message]
2026-08-05 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] crypto: Provide a function for zeroizing crypto_aes_ctx Eric Biggers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=anRC5AYai6TVHcac@kwain \
    --to=atenart@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox