From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
kurt.hackel@oracle.com, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>,
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>,
zach.brown@oracle.com, chris.mason@oracle.com
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 13:48:19 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c0b89573-bec7-45dc-b21d-a51f498c2e0c@default> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ACC6C9C.7080707@redhat.com>
> We can support them by falling back to the kernel. I'm a bit worried
> about the kernel playing with the hypervisor's version field. It's
> better to introduce yet a new version for the kernel, and check both.
On Nehalem, apps that need timestamp information at a high
frequency will likely use rdtsc/rdtscp directly.
I very much support Jeremy's efforts to make vsyscall+pvclock
work fast on processors other than the very newest ones.
Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avi Kivity [mailto:avi@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 4:26 AM
> To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge; Dan Magenheimer; Xen-devel; Kurt Hackel; the
> arch/x86 maintainers; Linux Kernel Mailing List; Glauber de Oliveira
> Costa; Keir Fraser; Zach Brown; Chris Mason
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall
> implementation
>
>
> On 10/06/2009 08:46 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >
> >> Instead of using vgetcpu() and rdtsc() independently, you can use
> >> rdtscp to read both atomically. This removes the need for
> the preempt
> >> notifier.
> >>
> > rdtscp first appeared on Intel with Nehalem, so we need to
> support older
> > Intel chips.
> >
>
> We can support them by falling back to the kernel. I'm a bit worried
> about the kernel playing with the hypervisor's version field. It's
> better to introduce yet a new version for the kernel, and check both.
>
> > You could use rdscp to get (tsc,cpu) atomically, but that's not
> > sufficient to be able to get a consistent snapshot of (tsc,
> time_info)
> > because it doesn't give you the pvclock_vcpu_time_info
> version number.
> > If TSC_AUX contained that too, it might be possible.
> Alternatively you
> > could compare the tsc with pvclock.tsc_timestamp, but
> unfortunately the
> > ABI doesn't specify that tsc_timestamp is updated in any particular
> > order compared to the rest of the fields, so you still
> can't use that to
> > get a consistent snapshot (we can revise the ABI, of course).
> >
> > So either way it doesn't avoid the need to iterate.
> vgetcpu will use
> > rdtscp if available, but I agree it is unfortunate we need to do a
> > redundant rdtsc in that case.
> >
> >
>
> def try_pvclock_vtime():
> tsc, p0 = rdtscp()
> v0 = pvclock[p0].version
> tsc, p = rdtscp()
> t = pvclock_time(pvclock[p], tsc)
> if p != p0 or pvclock[p].version != v0:
> raise Exception("Processor or timebased change under our feet")
> return t
>
> def pvclock_time():
> while True:
> try:
> return try_pvlock_time()
> except:
> pass
>
> So, two rdtscps and two compares.
>
> >>> + for (cpu = 0; cpu< nr_cpu_ids; cpu++)
> >>> + pvclock_vsyscall_time_info[cpu].version = ~0;
> >>> +
> >>> + __set_fixmap(FIX_PVCLOCK_TIME_INFO,
> >>> __pa(pvclock_vsyscall_time_info),
> >>> + PAGE_KERNEL_VSYSCALL);
> >>> +
> >>> + preempt_notifier_init(&pvclock_vsyscall_notifier,
> >>> +&pvclock_vsyscall_preempt_ops);
> >>> + preempt_notifier_register(&pvclock_vsyscall_notifier);
> >>> +
> >>>
> >> preempt notifiers are per-thread, not global, and will
> upset the cycle
> >> counters.
> >>
> > Ah, so I need to register it on every new thread? That's a
> bit awkward.
> >
>
> It's used to manage processor registers, much like the fpu.
> If a thread
> uses a register that's not saved and restored by the normal context
> switch code, it can register a preempt notifier to do that instead.
>
> > This is intended to satisfy the cycle-counters who want to do
> > gettimeofday a million times a second, where I guess the tradeoff of
> > avoiding a pile of syscalls is worth a bit of
> context-switch overhead.
> >
>
> It's sufficient to increment a version counter on thread
> migration, no
> need to do it on context switch.
>
> --
> Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are
> subtle and quick to panic.
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-07 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-06 0:50 [PATCH RFC] Extending pvclock down to usermode for vsyscall Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-06 0:50 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86/pvclock: make sure rdtsc doesn't speculate out of region Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-06 0:50 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86/pvclock: no need to use strong read barriers in pvclock_get_time_values Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-06 0:50 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-06 9:04 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-06 14:19 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-10-06 15:11 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-06 18:46 ` [Xen-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-07 10:25 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-07 19:29 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-07 20:09 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-07 21:19 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-07 21:37 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-07 21:51 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-07 21:53 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-07 20:48 ` Dan Magenheimer [this message]
2009-10-07 21:08 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-07 22:36 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-10-10 0:24 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-10 18:10 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-12 18:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-12 18:29 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-12 19:13 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-13 6:39 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-13 20:00 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-14 12:32 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-15 19:17 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-27 17:29 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-10-27 18:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-28 5:52 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-28 9:29 ` Glauber Costa
2009-10-28 9:34 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-28 17:47 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-29 12:13 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-29 13:03 ` Chris Mason
2009-10-29 14:46 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-10-29 15:07 ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-29 15:55 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-10-29 16:15 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-11-01 9:28 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-02 15:28 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-11-02 15:41 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-01 9:32 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-02 15:46 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-11-03 5:12 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-04 20:30 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-11-05 6:47 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-05 14:52 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-11-05 15:07 ` Keir Fraser
2009-11-04 21:19 ` john stultz
2009-11-04 21:28 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-11-05 0:02 ` john stultz
2009-11-05 0:45 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-10-06 0:50 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86/fixmap: add a predicate for usermode fixmaps Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-06 10:23 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2009-10-06 18:47 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-06 0:50 ` [PATCH 5/5] xen/time: add pvclock_clocksource_vread support Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-10-06 10:28 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2009-10-06 18:48 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c0b89573-bec7-45dc-b21d-a51f498c2e0c@default \
--to=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=gcosta@redhat.com \
--cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=kurt.hackel@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox