* [PATCH] mailbox: mtk-cmdq: fix runtime PM usage counter leak in cmdq_mbox_flush
@ 2026-08-23 11:23 manushprajwal
2026-08-24 5:43 ` Markus Elfring
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: manushprajwal @ 2026-08-23 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jassisinghbrar; +Cc: linux-kernel
cmdq_mbox_flush() calls pm_runtime_get_sync() and returns its error
code directly on failure. Per Documentation/power/runtime_pm.rst,
pm_runtime_get_sync() does not drop the usage counter on error, so the
caller is expected to release the reference itself. The early return
here skips that, leaking a runtime PM usage count on cmdq->mbox.dev on
every failed resume.
Fix it by calling pm_runtime_put_noidle() before returning, matching
the pattern used by other pm_runtime_get_sync() callers in the same
subsystem (e.g. drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c, drivers/gnss/sirf.c).
Signed-off-by: manushprajwal <manushprajwal555@gmail.com>
---
drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
index e523c84b4..2010aadbc 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
@@ -565,8 +565,10 @@ static int cmdq_mbox_flush(struct mbox_chan *chan, unsigned long timeout)
int ret;
ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(cmdq->mbox.dev);
- if (ret < 0)
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ pm_runtime_put_noidle(cmdq->mbox.dev);
return ret;
+ }
spin_lock_irqsave(&thread->chan->lock, flags);
if (list_empty(&thread->task_busy_list))
--
2.46.2.windows.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] mailbox: mtk-cmdq: fix runtime PM usage counter leak in cmdq_mbox_flush
2026-08-23 11:23 [PATCH] mailbox: mtk-cmdq: fix runtime PM usage counter leak in cmdq_mbox_flush manushprajwal
@ 2026-08-24 5:43 ` Markus Elfring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Markus Elfring @ 2026-08-24 5:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manush Prajwal, linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel,
Angelo Gioacchino Del Regno, Jassi Brar, Matthias Brugger
Cc: LKML, kernel-janitors, Jason-JH.Lin, Jassi Brar
…
> Fix it by calling pm_runtime_put_noidle() before returning, matching
> the pattern used by other pm_runtime_get_sync() callers in the same
> subsystem (e.g. …).
How do you think about to use the function “pm_runtime_resume_and_get” instead?
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.2/source/include/linux/pm_runtime.h#L530-L540
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.2/source/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c#L557-L611
Regards,
Markus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-24 5:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-23 11:23 [PATCH] mailbox: mtk-cmdq: fix runtime PM usage counter leak in cmdq_mbox_flush manushprajwal
2026-08-24 5:43 ` Markus Elfring
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox