From: "Jérémy Jean" <jeremy.jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr>
To: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@nvidia.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec 5/7] net/mlx5e: Use the packet sequence number for the IPsec IV
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2026 10:51:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0148c4045a29e1fa2f1760ff858961ef@oss.cyber.gouv.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76e305ba-47c0-4028-afdf-294dcfea11de@nvidia.com>
On 2026-10-06 08:49, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> On 05/10/2026 21:28, Jérémy Jean wrote:
>> On 2026-10-05 15:50, Jérémy Jean wrote:
>>> Hello Tariq,
>>>
>>> On 2026-10-05 15:06, Tariq Toukan wrote:
>>>> On 30/09/2026 17:45, Jérémy Jean wrote:
>>>>> mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv_esn() may decrement xo->seq.hi for a GSO skb
>>>>> based
>>>>> on the SA's current output counter. The metadata already contains
>>>>> the
>>>>> high word for the first packet, so this can produce the wrong IV.
>>>>>
>>>>> For a three-segment GSO skb starting at (H, 0), oseq is 2 and
>>>>> oseq - gso_segs wraps to 0xffffffff. The helper then uses (H-1, 0)
>>>>> for the IV instead of (H, 0). This can create a situation where GCM
>>>>> reuses a nonce.
>>>>>
>>>>> Remove the high-word adjustment and use xo->seq directly to
>>>>> generate
>>>>> the IV.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: cb01008390bb ("net/mlx5: IPSec, Add support for ESN")
>>>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>>>> Assisted-by: LLM
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jérémy Jean <Jeremy.Jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_rxtx.c | 12
>>>>> +-----------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/
>>>>> ipsec_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/
>>>>> ipsec_rxtx.c
>>>>> index 6056106edcc6..4aa9f9c52f57 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_rxtx.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_rxtx.c
>>>>> @@ -153,21 +153,11 @@ static void mlx5e_ipsec_set_swp(struct
>>>>> sk_buff *skb,
>>>>> void mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv_esn(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
>>>>> xfrm_state *x,
>>>>> struct xfrm_offload *xo)
>>>>> {
>>>>> - struct xfrm_replay_state_esn *replay_esn = x->replay_esn;
>>>>> - __u32 oseq = replay_esn->oseq;
>>>>> int iv_offset;
>>>>> __be64 seqno;
>>>>> - u32 seq_hi;
>>>>> -
>>>>> - if (unlikely(skb_is_gso(skb) && oseq <
>>>>> MLX5E_IPSEC_ESN_SCOPE_MID &&
>>>>> - MLX5E_IPSEC_ESN_SCOPE_MID < (oseq - skb_shinfo(skb)-
>>>>> >gso_segs))) {
>>>>> - seq_hi = xo->seq.hi - 1;
>>>>> - } else {
>>>>> - seq_hi = xo->seq.hi;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> /* Place the SN in the IV field */
>>>>> - seqno = cpu_to_be64(xo->seq.low + ((u64)seq_hi << 32));
>>>>> + seqno = cpu_to_be64(xo->seq.low + ((u64)xo->seq.hi << 32));
>>>>> iv_offset = skb_transport_offset(skb) + sizeof(struct
>>>>> ip_esp_hdr);
>>>>> skb_store_bits(skb, iv_offset, &seqno, 8);
>>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your patch.
>>>>
>>>> Doesn't this make mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv_esn() identical to
>>>> mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv()?
>>>>
>>>> I wouldn't keep both copies then..
>>>
>>> Good point: after a quick check, indeed you are probably right.
>>> I will look to simplify this in a new version of the patch series.
>>>
>>> Jérémy
>>
>> It seems to me that a delete only patch would be okay then? (see
>> patch below).
>> The removal of the check in mlx5e_ipsec_set_esn_ops() makes
>> mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv() the only callable function. Then it seems
>> one can simply remove lines. Do you confirm?
>>
>>
>
> From a quick look, it seems we can do even more by totally removing the
> set_iv_op function pointer.
Indeed, thanks for the suggestion.
Below is a diff to do this.
Does that you look right to you?
.../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c | 18 -----------
.../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.h | 2 --
.../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_rxtx.c | 31 +++----------------
.../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_rxtx.h | 4 ---
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c
index db260e3..de2e740 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c
@@ -651,22 +651,6 @@ static void mlx5e_ipsec_modify_state(struct
work_struct *_work)
mlx5_accel_esp_modify_xfrm(sa_entry, attrs);
}
-static void mlx5e_ipsec_set_esn_ops(struct mlx5e_ipsec_sa_entry
*sa_entry)
-{
- struct xfrm_state *x = sa_entry->x;
-
- if (x->xso.type != XFRM_DEV_OFFLOAD_CRYPTO ||
- x->xso.dir != XFRM_DEV_OFFLOAD_OUT)
- return;
-
- if (x->props.flags & XFRM_STATE_ESN) {
- sa_entry->set_iv_op = mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv_esn;
- return;
- }
-
- sa_entry->set_iv_op = mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv;
-}
-
static void mlx5e_ipsec_handle_netdev_event(struct work_struct *_work)
{
struct mlx5e_ipsec_work *work =
@@ -859,8 +843,6 @@ static int mlx5e_xfrm_add_state(struct net_device
*dev,
if (err)
goto err_add_rule;
- mlx5e_ipsec_set_esn_ops(sa_entry);
-
if (sa_entry->dwork)
queue_delayed_work(ipsec->wq, &sa_entry->dwork->dwork,
MLX5_IPSEC_RESCHED);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.h
b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.h
index abcbd38..172fce9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.h
@@ -278,8 +278,6 @@ struct mlx5e_ipsec_sa_entry {
struct net_device *dev;
struct mlx5e_ipsec *ipsec;
struct mlx5_accel_esp_xfrm_attrs attrs;
- void (*set_iv_op)(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_state *x,
- struct xfrm_offload *xo);
u32 ipsec_obj_id;
u32 enc_key_id;
struct mlx5e_ipsec_rule ipsec_rule;
diff --git
a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_rxtx.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_rxtx.c
index 6056106..4a9c334 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_rxtx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_rxtx.c
@@ -150,30 +150,7 @@ static void mlx5e_ipsec_set_swp(struct sk_buff
*skb,
}
-void mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv_esn(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_state *x,
- struct xfrm_offload *xo)
-{
- struct xfrm_replay_state_esn *replay_esn = x->replay_esn;
- __u32 oseq = replay_esn->oseq;
- int iv_offset;
- __be64 seqno;
- u32 seq_hi;
-
- if (unlikely(skb_is_gso(skb) && oseq < MLX5E_IPSEC_ESN_SCOPE_MID &&
- MLX5E_IPSEC_ESN_SCOPE_MID < (oseq - skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs)))
{
- seq_hi = xo->seq.hi - 1;
- } else {
- seq_hi = xo->seq.hi;
- }
-
- /* Place the SN in the IV field */
- seqno = cpu_to_be64(xo->seq.low + ((u64)seq_hi << 32));
- iv_offset = skb_transport_offset(skb) + sizeof(struct ip_esp_hdr);
- skb_store_bits(skb, iv_offset, &seqno, 8);
-}
-
-void mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_state *x,
- struct xfrm_offload *xo)
+static void mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_offload
*xo)
{
int iv_offset;
__be64 seqno;
@@ -264,7 +241,6 @@ bool mlx5e_ipsec_handle_tx_skb(struct net_device
*netdev,
{
struct mlx5e_priv *priv = netdev_priv(netdev);
struct xfrm_offload *xo = xfrm_offload(skb);
- struct mlx5e_ipsec_sa_entry *sa_entry;
struct xfrm_state *x;
struct sec_path *sp;
@@ -293,8 +269,9 @@ bool mlx5e_ipsec_handle_tx_skb(struct net_device
*netdev,
goto drop;
}
- sa_entry = (struct mlx5e_ipsec_sa_entry *)x->xso.offload_handle;
- sa_entry->set_iv_op(skb, x, xo);
+ if (x->xso.type == XFRM_DEV_OFFLOAD_CRYPTO &&
+ x->xso.dir == XFRM_DEV_OFFLOAD_OUT)
+ mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv(skb, xo);
mlx5e_ipsec_set_state(priv, skb, x, xo, ipsec_st);
return true;
diff --git
a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_rxtx.h
b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_rxtx.h
index 45b0d19..9a7e032 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_rxtx.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_rxtx.h
@@ -53,10 +53,6 @@ struct mlx5e_accel_tx_ipsec_state {
#ifdef CONFIG_MLX5_EN_IPSEC
-void mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv_esn(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_state *x,
- struct xfrm_offload *xo);
-void mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_state *x,
- struct xfrm_offload *xo);
bool mlx5e_ipsec_handle_tx_skb(struct net_device *netdev,
struct sk_buff *skb,
struct mlx5e_accel_tx_ipsec_state *ipsec_st);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-30 14:45 [PATCH ipsec 0/7] xfrm: fix ESP IV generation and ESN authentication Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 1/7] xfrm: esp6: use the current sequence number for the IV Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 2/7] xfrm: esp4: " Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 3/7] xfrm: esp: use the current sequence number for AAD and offload Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 4/7] xfrm: prevent AES-GCM nonce reuse after early GSO Jérémy Jean
2026-10-01 13:31 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-10-01 21:07 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 5/7] net/mlx5e: Use the packet sequence number for the IPsec IV Jérémy Jean
2026-10-01 11:42 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-10-01 19:33 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-10-05 13:06 ` Tariq Toukan
2026-10-05 13:50 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-10-05 18:28 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-10-06 6:49 ` Tariq Toukan
2026-10-06 8:51 ` Jérémy Jean [this message]
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 6/7] xfrm: segment untrusted GSO packets before sequence allocation Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 7/7] xfrm: leave the sequence counter unchanged on ESN overflow Jérémy Jean
2026-10-01 11:24 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-10-01 11:37 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-10-01 11:45 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-10-01 11:48 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:48 ` [PATCH ipsec 0/7] xfrm: fix ESP IV generation and ESN authentication netdev-bot+sinfo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0148c4045a29e1fa2f1760ff858961ef@oss.cyber.gouv.fr \
--to=jeremy.jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr \
--cc=borisp@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox