From: "Jérémy Jean" <jeremy.jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr>
To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@nvidia.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec 4/7] xfrm: prevent AES-GCM nonce reuse after early GSO
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 23:07:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c24271382cde79f3b043908ae52c41cf@oss.cyber.gouv.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ar5gnDR81WsA0TBg@krikkit>
On 2026-10-01 15:31, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> 2026-09-30, 14:45:21 +0000, Jérémy Jean wrote:
>> In the software ESP offload path, xfrm_output_gso() leaves its
>> segments
>> sharing a secpath extension. Each segment gets its own ESP sequence
>> number, but stores it in the same xo->seq field for IV generation.
>>
>> If encryption is delayed, later segments overwrite the value needed by
>> earlier ones: esp*_xmit() can then encrypt several packets with the
>> same
>> AES-GCM nonce, despite their distinct ESP sequence numbers.
>
> Here again, your commit message could describe much more precisely
> what actually happens.
>
> I'm guessing you mean something that starts like
>
> xfrm_output_gso
> segs = skb0,skb1... all with the same xo
> ...
> xfrm_output_one(skb0)
> xfrm_replay_overflow(skb0) xo->seq = N
> xfrm_output_one(skb1)
> xfrm_replay_overflow(skb1) xo->seq = N+1
> ...
>
> [and then some more stuff happens that gives them the right
> esph->seq_no but wrong 64b seqno used for the IV]
>
> But please help reviewers trace the codepath you've already gone down,
> without having to guess what you mean. You don't need to give the full
> call graph with the state of each variable, but there needs to be more
> than just the very beginning and the very end.
Here is a more verbose changelog I wrote for that patch:
---
With software ESP offload, xfrm_output() attaches a secpath before
calling xfrm_output_gso() for an encapsulated GSO packet, but
skb_gso_segment() leaves the splitted skbs sharing the same secpath,
including xo->seq.
For the i-th splitted segment, xfrm_output_gso() reaches
xfrm_replay_overflow() through xfrm_output_one(), which allocates
sequence number N+i to that segment, and then incorrectly overwrites
the shared xo->seq with N+i. If encryption is delayed until all t
segments have been processed, xo->seq ends up with value N+t-1 for all
segments. When validate_xmit_xfrm() calls esp*_xmit() for each
segment, the IV is constructed from the same value N+t-1, causing
nonce reuse in AES-GCM. Yet, each ESP header correctly keeps using
value N+i from its private XFRM_SKB_CB.
Call secpath_set() for each offloaded segment before xfrm_output2(),
so sequence allocation writes to private metadata that cannot be
overwritten by later segments.
---
Regards,
Jérémy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-01 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-30 14:45 [PATCH ipsec 0/7] xfrm: fix ESP IV generation and ESN authentication Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 1/7] xfrm: esp6: use the current sequence number for the IV Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 2/7] xfrm: esp4: " Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 3/7] xfrm: esp: use the current sequence number for AAD and offload Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 4/7] xfrm: prevent AES-GCM nonce reuse after early GSO Jérémy Jean
2026-10-01 13:31 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-10-01 21:07 ` Jérémy Jean [this message]
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 5/7] net/mlx5e: Use the packet sequence number for the IPsec IV Jérémy Jean
2026-10-01 11:42 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-10-01 19:33 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-10-05 13:06 ` Tariq Toukan
2026-10-05 13:50 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-10-05 18:28 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-10-06 6:49 ` Tariq Toukan
2026-10-06 8:51 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 6/7] xfrm: segment untrusted GSO packets before sequence allocation Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 7/7] xfrm: leave the sequence counter unchanged on ESN overflow Jérémy Jean
2026-10-01 11:24 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-10-01 11:37 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-10-01 11:45 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-10-01 11:48 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:48 ` [PATCH ipsec 0/7] xfrm: fix ESP IV generation and ESN authentication netdev-bot+sinfo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c24271382cde79f3b043908ae52c41cf@oss.cyber.gouv.fr \
--to=jeremy.jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr \
--cc=borisp@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox