From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
To: "Jérémy Jean" <jeremy.jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr>,
"Tariq Toukan" <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@nvidia.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec 5/7] net/mlx5e: Use the packet sequence number for the IPsec IV
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 09:49:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <76e305ba-47c0-4028-afdf-294dcfea11de@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e65b8b035eadcb1a776278b0887a57d7@oss.cyber.gouv.fr>
On 05/10/2026 21:28, Jérémy Jean wrote:
> On 2026-10-05 15:50, Jérémy Jean wrote:
>> Hello Tariq,
>>
>> On 2026-10-05 15:06, Tariq Toukan wrote:
>>> On 30/09/2026 17:45, Jérémy Jean wrote:
>>>> mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv_esn() may decrement xo->seq.hi for a GSO skb based
>>>> on the SA's current output counter. The metadata already contains the
>>>> high word for the first packet, so this can produce the wrong IV.
>>>>
>>>> For a three-segment GSO skb starting at (H, 0), oseq is 2 and
>>>> oseq - gso_segs wraps to 0xffffffff. The helper then uses (H-1, 0)
>>>> for the IV instead of (H, 0). This can create a situation where GCM
>>>> reuses a nonce.
>>>>
>>>> Remove the high-word adjustment and use xo->seq directly to generate
>>>> the IV.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: cb01008390bb ("net/mlx5: IPSec, Add support for ESN")
>>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>>> Assisted-by: LLM
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jérémy Jean <Jeremy.Jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_rxtx.c | 12
>>>> +-----------
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/
>>>> ipsec_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/
>>>> ipsec_rxtx.c
>>>> index 6056106edcc6..4aa9f9c52f57 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_rxtx.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_rxtx.c
>>>> @@ -153,21 +153,11 @@ static void mlx5e_ipsec_set_swp(struct sk_buff
>>>> *skb,
>>>> void mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv_esn(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_state
>>>> *x,
>>>> struct xfrm_offload *xo)
>>>> {
>>>> - struct xfrm_replay_state_esn *replay_esn = x->replay_esn;
>>>> - __u32 oseq = replay_esn->oseq;
>>>> int iv_offset;
>>>> __be64 seqno;
>>>> - u32 seq_hi;
>>>> -
>>>> - if (unlikely(skb_is_gso(skb) && oseq <
>>>> MLX5E_IPSEC_ESN_SCOPE_MID &&
>>>> - MLX5E_IPSEC_ESN_SCOPE_MID < (oseq - skb_shinfo(skb)-
>>>> >gso_segs))) {
>>>> - seq_hi = xo->seq.hi - 1;
>>>> - } else {
>>>> - seq_hi = xo->seq.hi;
>>>> - }
>>>> /* Place the SN in the IV field */
>>>> - seqno = cpu_to_be64(xo->seq.low + ((u64)seq_hi << 32));
>>>> + seqno = cpu_to_be64(xo->seq.low + ((u64)xo->seq.hi << 32));
>>>> iv_offset = skb_transport_offset(skb) + sizeof(struct
>>>> ip_esp_hdr);
>>>> skb_store_bits(skb, iv_offset, &seqno, 8);
>>>> }
>>>
>>> Thanks for your patch.
>>>
>>> Doesn't this make mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv_esn() identical to
>>> mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv()?
>>>
>>> I wouldn't keep both copies then..
>>
>> Good point: after a quick check, indeed you are probably right.
>> I will look to simplify this in a new version of the patch series.
>>
>> Jérémy
>
> It seems to me that a delete only patch would be okay then? (see
> patch below).
> The removal of the check in mlx5e_ipsec_set_esn_ops() makes
> mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv() the only callable function. Then it seems
> one can simply remove lines. Do you confirm?
>
>
From a quick look, it seems we can do even more by totally removing the
set_iv_op function pointer.
> .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c | 5 -----
> .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_rxtx.c | 22 -------------------
> .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_rxtx.h | 2 --
> 3 files changed, 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c b/
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c
> index db260e3..43ef5b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c
> @@ -659,11 +659,6 @@ static void mlx5e_ipsec_set_esn_ops(struct
> mlx5e_ipsec_sa_entry *sa_entry)
> x->xso.dir != XFRM_DEV_OFFLOAD_OUT)
> return;
>
> - if (x->props.flags & XFRM_STATE_ESN) {
> - sa_entry->set_iv_op = mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv_esn;
> - return;
> - }
> -
> sa_entry->set_iv_op = mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/
> ipsec_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/
> ipsec_rxtx.c
> index 6056106..9ffe094 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_rxtx.c
> @@ -150,28 +150,6 @@ static void mlx5e_ipsec_set_swp(struct sk_buff *skb,
>
> }
>
> -void mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv_esn(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_state *x,
> - struct xfrm_offload *xo)
> -{
> - struct xfrm_replay_state_esn *replay_esn = x->replay_esn;
> - __u32 oseq = replay_esn->oseq;
> - int iv_offset;
> - __be64 seqno;
> - u32 seq_hi;
> -
> - if (unlikely(skb_is_gso(skb) && oseq < MLX5E_IPSEC_ESN_SCOPE_MID &&
> - MLX5E_IPSEC_ESN_SCOPE_MID < (oseq -
> skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs))) {
> - seq_hi = xo->seq.hi - 1;
> - } else {
> - seq_hi = xo->seq.hi;
> - }
> -
> - /* Place the SN in the IV field */
> - seqno = cpu_to_be64(xo->seq.low + ((u64)seq_hi << 32));
> - iv_offset = skb_transport_offset(skb) + sizeof(struct ip_esp_hdr);
> - skb_store_bits(skb, iv_offset, &seqno, 8);
> -}
> -
> void mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_state *x,
> struct xfrm_offload *xo)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/
> ipsec_rxtx.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/
> ipsec_rxtx.h
> index 45b0d19..a3d92c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_rxtx.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_rxtx.h
> @@ -53,8 +53,6 @@ struct mlx5e_accel_tx_ipsec_state {
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MLX5_EN_IPSEC
>
> -void mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv_esn(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_state *x,
> - struct xfrm_offload *xo);
> void mlx5e_ipsec_set_iv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_state *x,
> struct xfrm_offload *xo);
> bool mlx5e_ipsec_handle_tx_skb(struct net_device *netdev,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-30 14:45 [PATCH ipsec 0/7] xfrm: fix ESP IV generation and ESN authentication Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 1/7] xfrm: esp6: use the current sequence number for the IV Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 2/7] xfrm: esp4: " Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 3/7] xfrm: esp: use the current sequence number for AAD and offload Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 4/7] xfrm: prevent AES-GCM nonce reuse after early GSO Jérémy Jean
2026-10-01 13:31 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-10-01 21:07 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 5/7] net/mlx5e: Use the packet sequence number for the IPsec IV Jérémy Jean
2026-10-01 11:42 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-10-01 19:33 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-10-05 13:06 ` Tariq Toukan
2026-10-05 13:50 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-10-05 18:28 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-10-06 6:49 ` Tariq Toukan [this message]
2026-10-06 8:51 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 6/7] xfrm: segment untrusted GSO packets before sequence allocation Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 7/7] xfrm: leave the sequence counter unchanged on ESN overflow Jérémy Jean
2026-10-01 11:24 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-10-01 11:37 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-10-01 11:45 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-10-01 11:48 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:48 ` [PATCH ipsec 0/7] xfrm: fix ESP IV generation and ESN authentication netdev-bot+sinfo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=76e305ba-47c0-4028-afdf-294dcfea11de@nvidia.com \
--to=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=borisp@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jeremy.jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox