From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: "Paweł Staszewski" <pstaszewski@itcare.pl>
Cc: Linux Network Development list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux Route Cache performance tests
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 18:29:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1320600597.6506.7.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EB6AE62.5050803@itcare.pl>
Le dimanche 06 novembre 2011 à 16:57 +0100, Paweł Staszewski a écrit :
> Hello
>
>
>
> I make some networking performance tests for Linux 3.1
>
> Configuration:
>
> Linux (pktget) ----> Linux (router) ----> Linux (Sink)
>
> pktgen config:
> clone_skb 32
> pkt_size 64
> delay 0
>
> pgset "flag IPDST_RND"
> pgset "dst_min 10.0.0.0"
> pgset "dst_max 10.18.255.255"
> pgset "config 1"
> pgset "flows 256"
> pgset "flowlen 8"
>
> TX performance for this host:
> eth0: RX: 0.00 P/s TX: 12346107.73 P/s TOTAL:
> 12346107.73 P/s
>
> On Linux (router):
> grep . /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/*
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/error_burst:500
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/error_cost:100
> grep: /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/flush: Permission denied
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_elasticity:4
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_interval:60
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_min_interval:0
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_min_interval_ms:500
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_thresh:2000000
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_timeout:60
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/max_size:8388608
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/min_adv_mss:256
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/min_pmtu:552
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/mtu_expires:600
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/redirect_load:2
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/redirect_number:9
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/redirect_silence:2048
>
> For the first 30secs maybee more router is forwarding ~5Mpps to the
> Linux (Sink)
> and some stats for this forst 30secs in attached image:
>
> http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/684/test1ih.png/
>
> Left up - pktgen linux
> left down - Linux router (htop)
> Right up - Linux router (bwm-ng - showing pps)
> Right down - Linux router (lnstat)
>
>
> And all is good - performance 5Mpps until Linux router will reach ~1kk
> entries
> What You can see on next attached image:
>
> http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/24/test2id.png/
>
> Forwarding performance drops from 5Mpps to 1,8Mpps
> And after 3 - 4 minutes it will stop on 0,7Mpps
>
>
> After flushing the route cache performance increase from 0.7Mpps to 6Mpps
> What You can see on next attached image:
>
> http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/197/test3r.png/
>
> Is it possible to turn off route cache ? and see what performance will
> be without caching
>
Route cache cannot handle DDOS situation, since it will be filled,
unless you have a lot of memory.
I am not sure what you expected here. If caches misses are too frequent,
a cache is useless, whatever how its done.
If you disable route cache, you'll get poor performance in normal
situation (99.9999% of cases, non DDOS), and same performance on DDOS,
in 0.0001% cases
Trick to disable it is to use a big (and negative) rebuild_count
$ echo 3000000000 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/rt_cache_rebuild_count
$ cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/rt_cache_rebuild_count
-1294967296
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-06 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-06 15:57 Linux Route Cache performance tests Paweł Staszewski
2011-11-06 17:29 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2011-11-06 18:28 ` Paweł Staszewski
2011-11-06 18:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-06 19:20 ` Paweł Staszewski
2011-11-06 19:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-06 20:25 ` Paweł Staszewski
2011-11-06 21:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-06 21:57 ` Paweł Staszewski
2011-11-06 23:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-07 8:36 ` Paweł Staszewski
2011-11-07 9:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-07 9:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-07 22:12 ` Paweł Staszewski
2011-11-07 13:42 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-11-07 14:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-09 17:24 ` [PATCH net-next] ipv4: PKTINFO doesnt need dst reference Eric Dumazet
2011-11-09 21:37 ` David Miller
2011-11-09 22:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-10 0:29 ` [PATCH net-next] bnx2x: reduce skb truesize by 50% Eric Dumazet
2011-11-10 15:05 ` Eilon Greenstein
2011-11-10 15:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-10 16:27 ` Eilon Greenstein
2011-11-10 16:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-13 18:53 ` Eilon Greenstein
2011-11-13 19:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-13 20:08 ` Eilon Greenstein
2011-11-13 22:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-14 5:08 ` David Miller
2011-11-14 6:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-14 15:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-14 19:21 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1320600597.6506.7.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pstaszewski@itcare.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox