From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: "Paweł Staszewski" <pstaszewski@itcare.pl>
Cc: Linux Network Development list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux Route Cache performance tests
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 19:48:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1320605326.6506.27.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EB6D1D8.8040604@itcare.pl>
Le dimanche 06 novembre 2011 à 19:28 +0100, Paweł Staszewski a écrit :
> W dniu 2011-11-06 18:29, Eric Dumazet pisze:
> > Le dimanche 06 novembre 2011 à 16:57 +0100, Paweł Staszewski a écrit :
> >> Hello
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I make some networking performance tests for Linux 3.1
> >>
> >> Configuration:
> >>
> >> Linux (pktget) ----> Linux (router) ----> Linux (Sink)
> >>
> >> pktgen config:
> >> clone_skb 32
> >> pkt_size 64
> >> delay 0
> >>
> >> pgset "flag IPDST_RND"
> >> pgset "dst_min 10.0.0.0"
> >> pgset "dst_max 10.18.255.255"
> >> pgset "config 1"
> >> pgset "flows 256"
> >> pgset "flowlen 8"
> >>
> >> TX performance for this host:
> >> eth0: RX: 0.00 P/s TX: 12346107.73 P/s TOTAL:
> >> 12346107.73 P/s
> >>
> >> On Linux (router):
> >> grep . /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/*
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/error_burst:500
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/error_cost:100
> >> grep: /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/flush: Permission denied
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_elasticity:4
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_interval:60
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_min_interval:0
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_min_interval_ms:500
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_thresh:2000000
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_timeout:60
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/max_size:8388608
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/min_adv_mss:256
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/min_pmtu:552
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/mtu_expires:600
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/redirect_load:2
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/redirect_number:9
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/redirect_silence:2048
> >>
> >> For the first 30secs maybee more router is forwarding ~5Mpps to the
> >> Linux (Sink)
> >> and some stats for this forst 30secs in attached image:
> >>
> >> http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/684/test1ih.png/
> >>
> >> Left up - pktgen linux
> >> left down - Linux router (htop)
> >> Right up - Linux router (bwm-ng - showing pps)
> >> Right down - Linux router (lnstat)
> >>
> >>
> >> And all is good - performance 5Mpps until Linux router will reach ~1kk
> >> entries
> >> What You can see on next attached image:
> >>
> >> http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/24/test2id.png/
> >>
> >> Forwarding performance drops from 5Mpps to 1,8Mpps
> >> And after 3 - 4 minutes it will stop on 0,7Mpps
> >>
> >>
> >> After flushing the route cache performance increase from 0.7Mpps to 6Mpps
> >> What You can see on next attached image:
> >>
> >> http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/197/test3r.png/
> >>
> >> Is it possible to turn off route cache ? and see what performance will
> >> be without caching
> >>
> > Route cache cannot handle DDOS situation, since it will be filled,
> > unless you have a lot of memory.
> hmm
> but what is DDOS situation for route cache ? new entries per sec ? total
> amount of entries 1,2kk in my tests ?
> Look sometimes in normal scenario You can hit
> 1245072 route cache entries
> This is normal for BGP configurations.
>
Then figure out the right tunables for your machine ?
Its not a laptop or average server setup, so you need to allow your
kernel to consume a fair amount of memory for the route cache.
Or accept low performance :(
> The performance of route cache is ok to the point where we reach more
> than 1245072 entries.
> Router is starting forwarding packets with 5Mpps and ends at about
> 0.7Mpps when more than 1245072 entries is reached.
> For my scenario
> Random ip generation start at: 10.0.0.0 ends on 10.18.255.255
> this is 1170450 random ip's
>
I have no problem with 4 millions entries in route cache, with full
performance, not 80%.
You currently have one hash table with 524288 entries
(before you changed /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_thresh)
Its not optimal for your workload, because you have many slots with 4
chained items, performance sucks.
You have to boot your machine with "rhash_entries=2097152", so that
average chain length is less than 1
Your problem is then solved :
# grep . /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/*
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/error_burst:5000
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/error_cost:1000
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_elasticity:8
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_min_interval:0
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_min_interval_ms:500
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_thresh:2097152
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_timeout:300
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/max_size:33554432
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/min_adv_mss:256
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/min_pmtu:552
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/mtu_expires:600
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/redirect_load:20
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/redirect_number:9
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/redirect_silence:20480
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-06 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-06 15:57 Linux Route Cache performance tests Paweł Staszewski
2011-11-06 17:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-06 18:28 ` Paweł Staszewski
2011-11-06 18:48 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2011-11-06 19:20 ` Paweł Staszewski
2011-11-06 19:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-06 20:25 ` Paweł Staszewski
2011-11-06 21:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-06 21:57 ` Paweł Staszewski
2011-11-06 23:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-07 8:36 ` Paweł Staszewski
2011-11-07 9:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-07 9:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-07 22:12 ` Paweł Staszewski
2011-11-07 13:42 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-11-07 14:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-09 17:24 ` [PATCH net-next] ipv4: PKTINFO doesnt need dst reference Eric Dumazet
2011-11-09 21:37 ` David Miller
2011-11-09 22:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-10 0:29 ` [PATCH net-next] bnx2x: reduce skb truesize by 50% Eric Dumazet
2011-11-10 15:05 ` Eilon Greenstein
2011-11-10 15:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-10 16:27 ` Eilon Greenstein
2011-11-10 16:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-13 18:53 ` Eilon Greenstein
2011-11-13 19:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-13 20:08 ` Eilon Greenstein
2011-11-13 22:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-14 5:08 ` David Miller
2011-11-14 6:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-14 15:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-11-14 19:21 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1320605326.6506.27.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pstaszewski@itcare.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox