* [patch-net-next 2/3] net: ethernet: cpsw: split out IRQ handler
2015-01-13 19:44 [patch-net-next 1/3] net: ethernet: cpsw: unroll IRQ request loop Felipe Balbi
@ 2015-01-13 19:44 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-01-13 19:44 ` [patch-net-next 3/3] net: ethernet: cpsw: don't requests IRQs we don't use Felipe Balbi
2015-01-14 5:18 ` [patch-net-next 1/3] net: ethernet: cpsw: unroll IRQ request loop David Miller
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Felipe Balbi @ 2015-01-13 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem
Cc: Tony Lindgren, Linux OMAP Mailing List, mugunthanvnm, netdev,
Felipe Balbi
Now we can introduce dedicated IRQ handlers
for each of the IRQ events. This helps with
cleaning up a little bit of the clutter in
cpsw_interrupt() while also making sure that
TX IRQs will try to handle TX buffers while
RX IRQs will try to handle RX buffers.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
index 6e04128b9543..c9081bdbbcbc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
@@ -754,18 +754,36 @@ requeue:
dev_kfree_skb_any(new_skb);
}
-static irqreturn_t cpsw_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
+static irqreturn_t cpsw_dummy_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
struct cpsw_priv *priv = dev_id;
int value = irq - priv->irqs_table[0];
- /* NOTICE: Ending IRQ here. The trick with the 'value' variable above
- * is to make sure we will always write the correct value to the EOI
- * register. Namely 0 for RX_THRESH Interrupt, 1 for RX Interrupt, 2
- * for TX Interrupt and 3 for MISC Interrupt.
- */
cpdma_ctlr_eoi(priv->dma, value);
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t cpsw_tx_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+ struct cpsw_priv *priv = dev_id;
+
+ cpdma_ctlr_eoi(priv->dma, CPDMA_EOI_TX);
+ cpdma_chan_process(priv->txch, 128);
+
+ priv = cpsw_get_slave_priv(priv, 1);
+ if (priv)
+ cpdma_chan_process(priv->txch, 128);
+
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t cpsw_rx_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+ struct cpsw_priv *priv = dev_id;
+
+ cpdma_ctlr_eoi(priv->dma, CPDMA_EOI_RX);
+
cpsw_intr_disable(priv);
if (priv->irq_enabled == true) {
cpsw_disable_irq(priv);
@@ -1617,7 +1635,8 @@ static void cpsw_ndo_poll_controller(struct net_device *ndev)
cpsw_intr_disable(priv);
cpdma_ctlr_int_ctrl(priv->dma, false);
- cpsw_interrupt(ndev->irq, priv);
+ cpsw_rx_interrupt(priv->irq[1], priv);
+ cpsw_tx_interrupt(priv->irq[2], priv);
cpdma_ctlr_int_ctrl(priv->dma, true);
cpsw_intr_enable(priv);
}
@@ -2351,7 +2370,7 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto clean_ale_ret;
priv->irqs_table[0] = irq;
- ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, cpsw_interrupt,
+ ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, cpsw_dummy_interrupt,
0, dev_name(&pdev->dev), priv);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(priv->dev, "error attaching irq (%d)\n", ret);
@@ -2363,7 +2382,7 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto clean_ale_ret;
priv->irqs_table[1] = irq;
- ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, cpsw_interrupt,
+ ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, cpsw_rx_interrupt,
0, dev_name(&pdev->dev), priv);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(priv->dev, "error attaching irq (%d)\n", ret);
@@ -2375,7 +2394,7 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto clean_ale_ret;
priv->irqs_table[2] = irq;
- ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, cpsw_interrupt,
+ ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, cpsw_tx_interrupt,
0, dev_name(&pdev->dev), priv);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(priv->dev, "error attaching irq (%d)\n", ret);
@@ -2387,7 +2406,7 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto clean_ale_ret;
priv->irqs_table[3] = irq;
- ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, cpsw_interrupt,
+ ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, cpsw_dummy_interrupt,
0, dev_name(&pdev->dev), priv);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(priv->dev, "error attaching irq (%d)\n", ret);
--
2.2.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [patch-net-next 3/3] net: ethernet: cpsw: don't requests IRQs we don't use
2015-01-13 19:44 [patch-net-next 1/3] net: ethernet: cpsw: unroll IRQ request loop Felipe Balbi
2015-01-13 19:44 ` [patch-net-next 2/3] net: ethernet: cpsw: split out IRQ handler Felipe Balbi
@ 2015-01-13 19:44 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-01-14 5:18 ` [patch-net-next 1/3] net: ethernet: cpsw: unroll IRQ request loop David Miller
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Felipe Balbi @ 2015-01-13 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem
Cc: Tony Lindgren, Linux OMAP Mailing List, mugunthanvnm, netdev,
Felipe Balbi
CPSW never uses RX_THRESHOLD or MISC interrupts. In
fact, they are always kept masked in their appropriate
IRQ Enable register.
Instead of allocating an IRQ that never fires, it's best
to remove that code altogether and let future patches
implement it if anybody needs those.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 55 ++++++++++++------------------------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
index c9081bdbbcbc..fd0acd9b41ae 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
@@ -754,16 +754,6 @@ requeue:
dev_kfree_skb_any(new_skb);
}
-static irqreturn_t cpsw_dummy_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
-{
- struct cpsw_priv *priv = dev_id;
- int value = irq - priv->irqs_table[0];
-
- cpdma_ctlr_eoi(priv->dma, value);
-
- return IRQ_HANDLED;
-}
-
static irqreturn_t cpsw_tx_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
struct cpsw_priv *priv = dev_id;
@@ -1635,8 +1625,8 @@ static void cpsw_ndo_poll_controller(struct net_device *ndev)
cpsw_intr_disable(priv);
cpdma_ctlr_int_ctrl(priv->dma, false);
- cpsw_rx_interrupt(priv->irq[1], priv);
- cpsw_tx_interrupt(priv->irq[2], priv);
+ cpsw_rx_interrupt(priv->irq[0], priv);
+ cpsw_tx_interrupt(priv->irq[1], priv);
cpdma_ctlr_int_ctrl(priv->dma, true);
cpsw_intr_enable(priv);
}
@@ -2358,30 +2348,27 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto clean_dma_ret;
}
- ndev->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+ ndev->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
if (ndev->irq < 0) {
dev_err(priv->dev, "error getting irq resource\n");
ret = -ENOENT;
goto clean_ale_ret;
}
- irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
- if (irq < 0)
- goto clean_ale_ret;
-
- priv->irqs_table[0] = irq;
- ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, cpsw_dummy_interrupt,
- 0, dev_name(&pdev->dev), priv);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(priv->dev, "error attaching irq (%d)\n", ret);
- goto clean_ale_ret;
- }
+ /* Grab RX and TX IRQs. Note that we also have RX_THRESHOLD and
+ * MISC IRQs which are always kept disabled with this driver so
+ * we will not request them.
+ *
+ * If anyone wants to implement support for those, make sure to
+ * first request and append them to irqs_table array.
+ */
+ /* RX IRQ */
irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
if (irq < 0)
goto clean_ale_ret;
- priv->irqs_table[1] = irq;
+ priv->irqs_table[0] = irq;
ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, cpsw_rx_interrupt,
0, dev_name(&pdev->dev), priv);
if (ret < 0) {
@@ -2389,31 +2376,19 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto clean_ale_ret;
}
+ /* TX IRQ */
irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 2);
if (irq < 0)
goto clean_ale_ret;
- priv->irqs_table[2] = irq;
+ priv->irqs_table[1] = irq;
ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, cpsw_tx_interrupt,
0, dev_name(&pdev->dev), priv);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(priv->dev, "error attaching irq (%d)\n", ret);
goto clean_ale_ret;
}
-
- irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 3);
- if (irq < 0)
- goto clean_ale_ret;
-
- priv->irqs_table[3] = irq;
- ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, cpsw_dummy_interrupt,
- 0, dev_name(&pdev->dev), priv);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(priv->dev, "error attaching irq (%d)\n", ret);
- goto clean_ale_ret;
- }
-
- priv->num_irqs = 4;
+ priv->num_irqs = 2;
ndev->features |= NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_FILTER;
--
2.2.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [patch-net-next 1/3] net: ethernet: cpsw: unroll IRQ request loop
2015-01-13 19:44 [patch-net-next 1/3] net: ethernet: cpsw: unroll IRQ request loop Felipe Balbi
2015-01-13 19:44 ` [patch-net-next 2/3] net: ethernet: cpsw: split out IRQ handler Felipe Balbi
2015-01-13 19:44 ` [patch-net-next 3/3] net: ethernet: cpsw: don't requests IRQs we don't use Felipe Balbi
@ 2015-01-14 5:18 ` David Miller
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2015-01-14 5:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: balbi; +Cc: tony, linux-omap, mugunthanvnm, netdev
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:44:46 -0600
> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, cpsw_interrupt,
> + 0, dev_name(&pdev->dev), priv);
When a function call spans multiple lines, the argument on the second
and subsequent lines must start on the first column after the openning
parenthesis of the function call.
If you are using only TAB characters to indent, you are likely not
doing it correctly.
> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, cpsw_interrupt,
> + 0, dev_name(&pdev->dev), priv);
Likewise.
> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, cpsw_interrupt,
> + 0, dev_name(&pdev->dev), priv);
Likewise.
> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, cpsw_interrupt,
> + 0, dev_name(&pdev->dev), priv);
Likewise.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread