From: "Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
robin.murphy@arm.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com
Cc: tglx@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, leon@kernel.org,
mbloch@nvidia.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 04/11] dma-mapping: add dma_alloc_attrs_node() and dma_alloc_coherent_node()
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 10:03:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ik2n5xcg.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261027022528.633359-5-kuba@kernel.org>
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> writes:
> Coherent DMA memory is always allocated on the NUMA node of the device.
> That's the right choice for memory mostly accessed by the device, but
> some coherent allocations are accessed by the CPU on every operation.
> For example a NIC's descriptor and completion rings are written and
> read by the CPU servicing the queue, which may well be on a different
> node than the device. Placing such rings on the device's node means
> the CPU accesses remote memory in the fast path.
>
> Drivers work around this today by temporarily changing the node
> of the device with set_dev_node() around dma_alloc_coherent()
> (mlx4, mlx5, ixgbe, xgbe). This is racy against anything else
> looking at the device's node at the same time.
>
> Add dma_alloc_attrs_node() which takes the node explicitly, and
> a dma_alloc_coherent_node() wrapper. dma_alloc_attrs() now passes
> dev_to_node(). The node is only a preference, the same as for
> kmalloc_node(). It is honored by dma-direct and iommu-dma, for both
> the page allocator and the per-numa CMA areas. Allocations from fixed
> pools and from dma_map_ops->alloc implementations ignore it.
>
> The memory is freed with the existing dma_free_attrs() /
> dma_free_coherent(), freeing does not depend on the node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> ---
> Documentation/core-api/dma-api.rst | 15 ++++++++++++++
> include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 14 +++++++++++++
> kernel/dma/mapping.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/dma-api.rst b/Documentation/core-api/dma-api.rst
> index ba23a472f794..f9a32b8c338f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/core-api/dma-api.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/dma-api.rst
> @@ -57,6 +57,21 @@ The flag parameter allows the caller to specify the ``GFP_`` flags (see
> kmalloc()) for the allocation (the implementation may ignore flags that affect
> the location of the returned memory, like GFP_DMA).
>
> +::
> +
> + void *
> + dma_alloc_coherent_node(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> + dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t flag, int node)
> +
> +Same as dma_alloc_coherent(), but places the memory on the given NUMA node
> +rather than on the node of the device. This is useful for memory accessed
> +frequently by both the device and a CPU on a different node, for example
> +descriptor rings serviced by that CPU. Pass NUMA_NO_NODE for no preference.
nit: maybe mention that callers that want the device-node semantics need
to pass dev_to_node(dev) themselves?
Björn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-27 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-27 2:25 [RFC 00/11] dma-mapping: add dma_alloc_attrs_node() and dma_alloc_coherent_node() Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-27 2:25 ` [RFC 01/11] dma-contiguous: pass the NUMA node to dma_alloc_contiguous() Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-27 2:25 ` [RFC 02/11] dma-direct: pass the NUMA node to dma_direct_alloc() Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-27 2:25 ` [RFC 03/11] iommu/dma: pass the NUMA node to iommu_dma_alloc() Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-27 2:25 ` [RFC 04/11] dma-mapping: add dma_alloc_attrs_node() and dma_alloc_coherent_node() Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-27 9:03 ` Björn Töpel [this message]
2026-10-27 15:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-27 15:24 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-10-27 17:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-28 9:00 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-10-27 2:25 ` [RFC 05/11] eth: libwx: restore the device's NUMA node after ring allocation Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-27 2:25 ` [RFC 06/11] eth: libwx: use dma_alloc_coherent_node() Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-27 2:25 ` [RFC 07/11] eth: ixgbe: " Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-27 9:06 ` Björn Töpel
2026-10-27 15:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-27 16:06 ` Björn Töpel
2026-10-27 18:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-27 2:25 ` [RFC 08/11] eth: xgbe: " Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-27 2:25 ` [RFC 09/11] eth: fungible: " Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-27 2:25 ` [RFC 10/11] eth: mlx5: " Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-27 2:25 ` [RFC 11/11] eth: mlx4: " Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-27 9:03 ` [RFC 00/11] dma-mapping: add dma_alloc_attrs_node() and dma_alloc_coherent_node() Björn Töpel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ik2n5xcg.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us \
--to=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox