From: Alejandro Lucero Palau <alucerop@amd.com>
To: "Dan Williams (nvidia)" <djbw@kernel.org>,
alejandro.lucero-palau@amd.com, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, edward.cree@amd.com, davem@davemloft.net,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
dave.jiang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v27 4/5] sfc: obtain and map cxl range using devm_cxl_probe_mem
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:10:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <96ee638f-3b10-4baa-a6df-5a79efee8b8f@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a28a206bf61a_4fa78100e4@djbw-dev.notmuch>
On 6/10/26 00:30, Dan Williams (nvidia) wrote:
> alejandro.lucero-palau@ wrote:
>> From: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@amd.com>
>>
>> Use core API for safely obtain the CXL range linked to an HDM committed
>> by the BIOS. Map such a range for being used as the ctpio buffer.
>>
>> A potential user space action through sysfs unbinding or core cxl
>> modules remove will trigger sfc driver device detachment, with that case
>> not racing with this mapping as this is done during driver probe and
>> therefore protected with device lock against those user space actions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c | 1 +
>> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.h | 3 +++
>> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c
>> index 90ccbe310386..578054c21e79 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c
>> @@ -984,6 +984,7 @@ static void efx_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
>> efx_fini_io(efx);
>>
>> probe_data = container_of(efx, struct efx_probe_data, efx);
>> + efx_cxl_exit(probe_data);
>>
>> pci_dbg(efx->pci_dev, "shutdown successful\n");
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
>> index 4d55c08cf2a1..d5766a40e2cf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ int efx_cxl_init(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
>> {
>> struct efx_nic *efx = &probe_data->efx;
>> struct pci_dev *pci_dev = efx->pci_dev;
>> + struct range cxl_pio_range;
>> struct efx_cxl *cxl;
>> u16 dvsec;
>> int rc;
>> @@ -75,9 +76,32 @@ int efx_cxl_init(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
>> return -ENODEV;
>> }
>>
>> + cxl->cxlmd = devm_cxl_probe_mem(&cxl->cxlds, &cxl_pio_range);
>> + if (IS_ERR(cxl->cxlmd)) {
>> + pci_err(pci_dev, "CXL accel memdev creation failed\n");
>> + return PTR_ERR(cxl->cxlmd);
>> + }
>> +
>> + cxl->ctpio_cxl = ioremap_wc(cxl_pio_range.start,
>> + range_len(&cxl_pio_range));
>> + if (!cxl->ctpio_cxl) {
>> + pci_err(pci_dev, "CXL ioremap region (%pra) failed\n",
>> + &cxl_pio_range);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
> Dave caught the iounmap leak, but another concern is since you want to
> continue operation if efx_cxl_init() fails then you probably also want
> to release the successful attachment to the CXL domain if this happens.
I will do that.
> Minor since something else is likely to fail if ioremap is not reliable.
>
> Otherwise this looks good and with those fixed up the Reviewed-by still
> stands.
No Reviewed-by yet ... this is a new patch after your series removing
previous functionality.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-10 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 21:57 [PATCH v27 0/5] Type2 device basic support alejandro.lucero-palau
2026-06-09 21:57 ` [PATCH v27 1/5] sfc: add cxl support alejandro.lucero-palau
2026-06-09 21:57 ` [PATCH v27 2/5] cxl/sfc: Map cxl regs alejandro.lucero-palau
2026-06-09 21:57 ` [PATCH v27 3/5] cxl/sfc: Initialize dpa without a mailbox alejandro.lucero-palau
2026-06-09 23:24 ` Dan Williams (nvidia)
2026-06-10 6:03 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2026-06-16 19:35 ` Dan Williams (nvidia)
2026-06-09 21:57 ` [PATCH v27 4/5] sfc: obtain and map cxl range using devm_cxl_probe_mem alejandro.lucero-palau
2026-06-09 21:58 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-10 5:48 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2026-06-09 23:30 ` Dan Williams (nvidia)
2026-06-10 6:10 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau [this message]
2026-06-10 13:56 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2026-06-15 14:47 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2026-06-16 19:51 ` Dan Williams (nvidia)
2026-06-09 21:57 ` [PATCH v27 5/5] sfc: support pio mapping based on cxl alejandro.lucero-palau
2026-06-09 22:18 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-10 5:50 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=96ee638f-3b10-4baa-a6df-5a79efee8b8f@amd.com \
--to=alucerop@amd.com \
--cc=alejandro.lucero-palau@amd.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=edward.cree@amd.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox