From: "Dan Williams (nvidia)" <djbw@kernel.org>
To: Alejandro Lucero Palau <alucerop@amd.com>,
"Dan Williams (nvidia)" <djbw@kernel.org>,
alejandro.lucero-palau@amd.com, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, edward.cree@amd.com,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, dave.jiang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v27 4/5] sfc: obtain and map cxl range using devm_cxl_probe_mem
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 12:51:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a31a948d61f5_9b8551006b@djbw-dev.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50d8e423-8248-4e26-901b-010d14d22e67@amd.com>
Alejandro Lucero Palau wrote:
>
> On 6/10/26 14:56, Alejandro Lucero Palau wrote:
> >
> > On 6/10/26 07:10, Alejandro Lucero Palau wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/10/26 00:30, Dan Williams (nvidia) wrote:
> >>> alejandro.lucero-palau@ wrote:
> >>>> From: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@amd.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Use core API for safely obtain the CXL range linked to an HDM
> >>>> committed
> >>>> by the BIOS. Map such a range for being used as the ctpio buffer.
> >>>>
> >>>> A potential user space action through sysfs unbinding or core cxl
> >>>> modules remove will trigger sfc driver device detachment, with that
> >>>> case
> >>>> not racing with this mapping as this is done during driver probe and
> >>>> therefore protected with device lock against those user space actions.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@amd.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c | 1 +
> >>>> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.h | 3 +++
> >>>> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c
> >>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c
> >>>> index 90ccbe310386..578054c21e79 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c
> >>>> @@ -984,6 +984,7 @@ static void efx_pci_remove(struct pci_dev
> >>>> *pci_dev)
> >>>> efx_fini_io(efx);
> >>>> probe_data = container_of(efx, struct efx_probe_data, efx);
> >>>> + efx_cxl_exit(probe_data);
> >>>> pci_dbg(efx->pci_dev, "shutdown successful\n");
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
> >>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
> >>>> index 4d55c08cf2a1..d5766a40e2cf 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
> >>>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ int efx_cxl_init(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
> >>>> {
> >>>> struct efx_nic *efx = &probe_data->efx;
> >>>> struct pci_dev *pci_dev = efx->pci_dev;
> >>>> + struct range cxl_pio_range;
> >>>> struct efx_cxl *cxl;
> >>>> u16 dvsec;
> >>>> int rc;
> >>>> @@ -75,9 +76,32 @@ int efx_cxl_init(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
> >>>> return -ENODEV;
> >>>> }
> >>>> + cxl->cxlmd = devm_cxl_probe_mem(&cxl->cxlds, &cxl_pio_range);
> >>>> + if (IS_ERR(cxl->cxlmd)) {
> >>>> + pci_err(pci_dev, "CXL accel memdev creation failed\n");
> >>>> + return PTR_ERR(cxl->cxlmd);
> >>>> + }
> >>>> +
> >>>> + cxl->ctpio_cxl = ioremap_wc(cxl_pio_range.start,
> >>>> + range_len(&cxl_pio_range));
> >>>> + if (!cxl->ctpio_cxl) {
> >>>> + pci_err(pci_dev, "CXL ioremap region (%pra) failed\n",
> >>>> + &cxl_pio_range);
> >>>> + return -ENOMEM;
> >>> Dave caught the iounmap leak, but another concern is since you want to
> >>> continue operation if efx_cxl_init() fails then you probably also want
> >>> to release the successful attachment to the CXL domain if this happens.
> >>
> >>
> >> I will do that.
> >>
> >
> > Looking at this issue, I think an error when creating the memdev or
> > during the region attach triggers the memdev removal, but ...
> >
> >
> >>
> >>> Minor since something else is likely to fail if ioremap is not
> >>> reliable.
> >
> >
> > .. if we want to specifically do that with an unlikely (but possible)
> > ioremap error something else needs to be exported like
> > cxl_memdev_unregister(). Are you happy with that approach?
> >
>
> I have just tested with this:
>
> +void cxl_memdev_remove(void *_cxlmd)
> +{
> + struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd = _cxlmd;
> + struct device *dev = &cxlmd->dev;
> +
> + devm_remove_action_nowarn(cxlmd->cxlds->dev, cxl_memdev_unregister,
> + cxlmd);
> +
> + cdev_device_del(&cxlmd->cdev, dev);
> + cxl_memdev_shutdown(dev);
> + put_device(dev);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_memdev_remove, "CXL");
>
>
> only called if the ioremap fails.
>
>
> Please, let me know if you like this approach before sending another
> version.
A devres group can automatically cleanup after devm_cxl_memdev_probe()
in the error path with no new exports needed from the CXL core.
Something like:
void *group = devres_open_group(cxl->cxlds.dev, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
int rc = 0;
if (!group)
return -ENOMEM;
cxl->cxlmd = devm_cxl_probe_mem(&cxl->cxlds, &cxl_pio_range);
if (IS_ERR(cxl->cxlmd)) {
pci_err(pci_dev, "CXL accel memdev creation failed\n");
rc = PTR_ERR(cxl->cxlmd);
goto out;
}
cxl->ctpio_cxl =
ioremap_wc(cxl_pio_range.start, range_len(&cxl_pio_range));
if (!cxl->ctpio_cxl) {
pci_err(pci_dev, "CXL ioremap region (%pra) failed\n",
&cxl_pio_range);
rc = -ENOMEM;
}
out:
if (rc)
devres_release_group(group);
else
devres_remove_group(group);
return rc;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 21:57 [PATCH v27 0/5] Type2 device basic support alejandro.lucero-palau
2026-06-09 21:57 ` [PATCH v27 1/5] sfc: add cxl support alejandro.lucero-palau
2026-06-09 21:57 ` [PATCH v27 2/5] cxl/sfc: Map cxl regs alejandro.lucero-palau
2026-06-09 21:57 ` [PATCH v27 3/5] cxl/sfc: Initialize dpa without a mailbox alejandro.lucero-palau
2026-06-09 23:24 ` Dan Williams (nvidia)
2026-06-10 6:03 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2026-06-16 19:35 ` Dan Williams (nvidia)
2026-06-09 21:57 ` [PATCH v27 4/5] sfc: obtain and map cxl range using devm_cxl_probe_mem alejandro.lucero-palau
2026-06-09 21:58 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-10 5:48 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2026-06-09 23:30 ` Dan Williams (nvidia)
2026-06-10 6:10 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2026-06-10 13:56 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2026-06-15 14:47 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2026-06-16 19:51 ` Dan Williams (nvidia) [this message]
2026-06-09 21:57 ` [PATCH v27 5/5] sfc: support pio mapping based on cxl alejandro.lucero-palau
2026-06-09 22:18 ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-10 5:50 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6a31a948d61f5_9b8551006b@djbw-dev.notmuch \
--to=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=alejandro.lucero-palau@amd.com \
--cc=alucerop@amd.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=edward.cree@amd.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox