Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alejandro Lucero Palau <alucerop@amd.com>
To: "Dan Williams (nvidia)" <djbw@kernel.org>,
	alejandro.lucero-palau@amd.com, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, edward.cree@amd.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	dave.jiang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v27 4/5] sfc: obtain and map cxl range using devm_cxl_probe_mem
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 10:42:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a423702c-05f6-4b4b-9ad4-fcaec2e07957@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a31a948d61f5_9b8551006b@djbw-dev.notmuch>


On 6/16/26 20:51, Dan Williams (nvidia) wrote:
> Alejandro Lucero Palau wrote:
>> On 6/10/26 14:56, Alejandro Lucero Palau wrote:
>>> On 6/10/26 07:10, Alejandro Lucero Palau wrote:
>>>> On 6/10/26 00:30, Dan Williams (nvidia) wrote:
>>>>> alejandro.lucero-palau@ wrote:
>>>>>> From: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@amd.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Use core API for safely obtain the CXL range linked to an HDM
>>>>>> committed
>>>>>> by the BIOS. Map such a range for being used as the ctpio buffer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A potential user space action through sysfs unbinding or core cxl
>>>>>> modules remove will trigger sfc driver device detachment, with that
>>>>>> case
>>>>>> not racing with this mapping as this is done during driver probe and
>>>>>> therefore protected with device lock against those user space actions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@amd.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>    drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c     |  1 +
>>>>>>    drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>    drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.h |  3 +++
>>>>>>    3 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c
>>>>>> index 90ccbe310386..578054c21e79 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c
>>>>>> @@ -984,6 +984,7 @@ static void efx_pci_remove(struct pci_dev
>>>>>> *pci_dev)
>>>>>>        efx_fini_io(efx);
>>>>>>          probe_data = container_of(efx, struct efx_probe_data, efx);
>>>>>> +    efx_cxl_exit(probe_data);
>>>>>>          pci_dbg(efx->pci_dev, "shutdown successful\n");
>>>>>>    diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
>>>>>> index 4d55c08cf2a1..d5766a40e2cf 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
>>>>>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ int efx_cxl_init(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
>>>>>>    {
>>>>>>        struct efx_nic *efx = &probe_data->efx;
>>>>>>        struct pci_dev *pci_dev = efx->pci_dev;
>>>>>> +    struct range cxl_pio_range;
>>>>>>        struct efx_cxl *cxl;
>>>>>>        u16 dvsec;
>>>>>>        int rc;
>>>>>> @@ -75,9 +76,32 @@ int efx_cxl_init(struct efx_probe_data *probe_data)
>>>>>>            return -ENODEV;
>>>>>>        }
>>>>>>    +    cxl->cxlmd = devm_cxl_probe_mem(&cxl->cxlds, &cxl_pio_range);
>>>>>> +    if (IS_ERR(cxl->cxlmd)) {
>>>>>> +        pci_err(pci_dev, "CXL accel memdev creation failed\n");
>>>>>> +        return PTR_ERR(cxl->cxlmd);
>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +    cxl->ctpio_cxl = ioremap_wc(cxl_pio_range.start,
>>>>>> +                    range_len(&cxl_pio_range));
>>>>>> +    if (!cxl->ctpio_cxl) {
>>>>>> +        pci_err(pci_dev, "CXL ioremap region (%pra) failed\n",
>>>>>> +            &cxl_pio_range);
>>>>>> +        return -ENOMEM;
>>>>> Dave caught the iounmap leak, but another concern is since you want to
>>>>> continue operation if efx_cxl_init() fails then you probably also want
>>>>> to release the successful attachment to the CXL domain if this happens.
>>>>
>>>> I will do that.
>>>>
>>> Looking at this issue, I think an error when creating the memdev or
>>> during the region attach triggers the memdev removal, but ...
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Minor since something else is likely to fail if ioremap is not
>>>>> reliable.
>>>
>>> .. if we want to specifically do that with an unlikely (but possible)
>>> ioremap error something else needs to be exported like
>>> cxl_memdev_unregister(). Are you happy with that approach?
>>>
>> I have just tested with this:
>>
>> +void cxl_memdev_remove(void *_cxlmd)
>> +{
>> +       struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd = _cxlmd;
>> +       struct device *dev = &cxlmd->dev;
>> +
>> +       devm_remove_action_nowarn(cxlmd->cxlds->dev, cxl_memdev_unregister,
>> +                                 cxlmd);
>> +
>> +       cdev_device_del(&cxlmd->cdev, dev);
>> +       cxl_memdev_shutdown(dev);
>> +       put_device(dev);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_memdev_remove, "CXL");
>>
>>
>> only called if the ioremap fails.
>>
>>
>> Please, let me know if you like this approach before sending another
>> version.
> A devres group can automatically cleanup after devm_cxl_memdev_probe()
> in the error path with no new exports needed from the CXL core.
> Something like:
>
>          void *group = devres_open_group(cxl->cxlds.dev, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
>          int rc = 0;
>
>          if (!group)
>                  return -ENOMEM;
>          
>          cxl->cxlmd = devm_cxl_probe_mem(&cxl->cxlds, &cxl_pio_range);
>          if (IS_ERR(cxl->cxlmd)) {
>                  pci_err(pci_dev, "CXL accel memdev creation failed\n");
>                  rc = PTR_ERR(cxl->cxlmd);
>                  goto out;
>          }
>
>          cxl->ctpio_cxl =
>                  ioremap_wc(cxl_pio_range.start, range_len(&cxl_pio_range));
>          if (!cxl->ctpio_cxl) {
>                  pci_err(pci_dev, "CXL ioremap region (%pra) failed\n",
>                          &cxl_pio_range);
>                  rc = -ENOMEM;
>          }
>
> out:
>          if (rc)
>                  devres_release_group(group);
>          else
>                  devres_remove_group(group);
>          return rc;


OK. I will use this in v28 instead of that export.


Thanks


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-17  9:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-09 21:57 [PATCH v27 0/5] Type2 device basic support alejandro.lucero-palau
2026-06-09 21:57 ` [PATCH v27 1/5] sfc: add cxl support alejandro.lucero-palau
2026-06-09 21:57 ` [PATCH v27 2/5] cxl/sfc: Map cxl regs alejandro.lucero-palau
2026-06-09 21:57 ` [PATCH v27 3/5] cxl/sfc: Initialize dpa without a mailbox alejandro.lucero-palau
2026-06-09 23:24   ` Dan Williams (nvidia)
2026-06-10  6:03     ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2026-06-16 19:35       ` Dan Williams (nvidia)
2026-06-09 21:57 ` [PATCH v27 4/5] sfc: obtain and map cxl range using devm_cxl_probe_mem alejandro.lucero-palau
2026-06-09 21:58   ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-10  5:48     ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2026-06-09 23:30   ` Dan Williams (nvidia)
2026-06-10  6:10     ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2026-06-10 13:56       ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2026-06-15 14:47         ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2026-06-16 19:51           ` Dan Williams (nvidia)
2026-06-17  9:42             ` Alejandro Lucero Palau [this message]
2026-06-09 21:57 ` [PATCH v27 5/5] sfc: support pio mapping based on cxl alejandro.lucero-palau
2026-06-09 22:18   ` Dave Jiang
2026-06-10  5:50     ` Alejandro Lucero Palau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a423702c-05f6-4b4b-9ad4-fcaec2e07957@amd.com \
    --to=alucerop@amd.com \
    --cc=alejandro.lucero-palau@amd.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=djbw@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=edward.cree@amd.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox