Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>
To: "Amery Hung" <ameryhung@gmail.com>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	<andrii@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	<memxor@gmail.com>, <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
	<shakeel.butt@linux.dev>, <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	<kuniyu@google.com>, <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>,
	<kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/15] bpf: Make struct_ops tasks_rcu grace period optional
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 15:01:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DJXOBRV3S89L.3OLMFO3UY0WS8@etsalapatis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706171918.317102-3-ameryhung@gmail.com>

On Mon Jul 6, 2026 at 1:19 PM EDT, Amery Hung wrote:
> From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
>
> bpf_struct_ops_map_free() currently waits for both a regular RCU grace
> period and a tasks RCU grace period for every struct_ops map through
> synchronize_rcu_mult(call_rcu, call_rcu_tasks).
>
> A regular RCU grace period is still required for all struct_ops maps
> because the struct_ops trampoline ksyms requires a rcu grace period
> (take a look at the list_del_rcu in __bpf_ksym_del).
> Add a map_free_pre_rcu() callback so the struct_ops map can remove
> ksyms before bpf_map_put() wait for the regular rcu grace period.
>
> The tasks RCU grace period is only needed by tcp_congestion_ops.
> Add free_after_tasks_rcu_gp only to struct bpf_struct_ops instead
> of the bpf_map.
>
> When CONFIG_TASKS_RCU=n, synchronize_rcu_tasks() is the same as
> synchronize_rcu(). Since all struct_ops maps now complete a regular RCU
> grace period before bpf_struct_ops_map_free() runs, skip the extra
> synchronize_rcu_tasks() call in this case.
>
> This cleanup prepares for a later patch that needs to support
> free_after_mult_rcu_gp.
>
> Reviewed-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>

The Sashiko issue looks spurious to me. bpf_prog_dissoc_progs() is not
related to the availability of the struct_ops methods. It is valid for
it to be after the end of the grace period.

> ---
>  include/linux/bpf.h         |  7 +++++++
>  kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 31 +++++++++++++------------------
>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c        |  3 +++
>  net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c       | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index 7719f6528445..7ac8873839f4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ struct bpf_map_ops {
>  	struct bpf_map *(*map_alloc)(union bpf_attr *attr);
>  	void (*map_release)(struct bpf_map *map, struct file *map_file);
>  	void (*map_free)(struct bpf_map *map);
> +	void (*map_free_pre_rcu)(struct bpf_map *map);
>  	int (*map_get_next_key)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *next_key);
>  	void (*map_release_uref)(struct bpf_map *map);
>  	void *(*map_lookup_elem_sys_only)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key);
> @@ -2099,6 +2100,11 @@ struct btf_member;
>   *	   unloaded while in use.
>   * @name: The name of the struct bpf_struct_ops object.
>   * @func_models: Func models
> + * @free_after_tasks_rcu_gp: Set to true if it needs the bpf core to wait for
> + *                           a tasks_rcu gp before freeing the struct_ops map
> + *                           and its progs. It is unnecessary if the @unreg
> + *                           has waited for the correct rcu gp or the @unreg
> + *                           has ensured all struct_ops prog has finished running.
>   */
>  struct bpf_struct_ops {
>  	const struct bpf_verifier_ops *verifier_ops;
> @@ -2117,6 +2123,7 @@ struct bpf_struct_ops {
>  	struct module *owner;
>  	const char *name;
>  	struct btf_func_model func_models[BPF_STRUCT_OPS_MAX_NR_MEMBERS];
> +	bool free_after_tasks_rcu_gp;
>  };
>  
>  /* Every member of a struct_ops type has an instance even a member is not
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
> index d06b3d9bcc13..c422ce41873e 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
> @@ -984,9 +984,18 @@ static void __bpf_struct_ops_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
>  	bpf_map_area_free(st_map);
>  }
>  
> +static void bpf_struct_ops_map_free_pre_rcu(struct bpf_map *map)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map = (struct bpf_struct_ops_map *)map;
> +
> +	bpf_struct_ops_map_del_ksyms(st_map);
> +}
> +
>  static void bpf_struct_ops_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map = (struct bpf_struct_ops_map *)map;
> +	struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops = st_map->st_ops_desc->st_ops;
> +	bool tasks_rcu = st_ops->free_after_tasks_rcu_gp;
>  
>  	/* st_ops->owner was acquired during map_alloc to implicitly holds
>  	 * the btf's refcnt. The acquire was only done when btf_is_module()
> @@ -997,24 +1006,8 @@ static void bpf_struct_ops_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
>  
>  	bpf_struct_ops_map_dissoc_progs(st_map);
>  
> -	bpf_struct_ops_map_del_ksyms(st_map);
> -
> -	/* The struct_ops's function may switch to another struct_ops.
> -	 *
> -	 * For example, bpf_tcp_cc_x->init() may switch to
> -	 * another tcp_cc_y by calling
> -	 * setsockopt(TCP_CONGESTION, "tcp_cc_y").
> -	 * During the switch,  bpf_struct_ops_put(tcp_cc_x) is called
> -	 * and its refcount may reach 0 which then free its
> -	 * trampoline image while tcp_cc_x is still running.
> -	 *
> -	 * A vanilla rcu gp is to wait for all bpf-tcp-cc prog
> -	 * to finish. bpf-tcp-cc prog is non sleepable.
> -	 * A rcu_tasks gp is to wait for the last few insn
> -	 * in the tramopline image to finish before releasing
> -	 * the trampoline image.
> -	 */
> -	synchronize_rcu_mult(call_rcu, call_rcu_tasks);
> +	if (tasks_rcu && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU))
> +		synchronize_rcu_tasks();
>  
>  	__bpf_struct_ops_map_free(map);
>  }
> @@ -1123,6 +1116,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
>  
>  	mutex_init(&st_map->lock);
>  	bpf_map_init_from_attr(map, attr);
> +	map->free_after_rcu_gp = true;
>  
>  	return map;
>  
> @@ -1155,6 +1149,7 @@ const struct bpf_map_ops bpf_struct_ops_map_ops = {
>  	.map_alloc_check = bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc_check,
>  	.map_alloc = bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc,
>  	.map_free = bpf_struct_ops_map_free,
> +	.map_free_pre_rcu = bpf_struct_ops_map_free_pre_rcu,
>  	.map_get_next_key = bpf_struct_ops_map_get_next_key,
>  	.map_lookup_elem = bpf_struct_ops_map_lookup_elem,
>  	.map_delete_elem = bpf_struct_ops_map_delete_elem,
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index 6db306d23b47..b07acf37ad1d 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -956,6 +956,9 @@ void bpf_map_put(struct bpf_map *map)
>  		/* bpf_map_free_id() must be called first */
>  		bpf_map_free_id(map);
>  
> +		if (map->ops->map_free_pre_rcu)
> +			map->ops->map_free_pre_rcu(map);
> +
>  		WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic64_read(&map->sleepable_refcnt));
>  		/* RCU tasks trace grace period implies RCU grace period. */
>  		if (READ_ONCE(map->free_after_mult_rcu_gp))
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
> index 791e15063237..e224ecafbd69 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
> @@ -339,6 +339,22 @@ static struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_tcp_congestion_ops = {
>  	.validate = bpf_tcp_ca_validate,
>  	.name = "tcp_congestion_ops",
>  	.cfi_stubs = &__bpf_ops_tcp_congestion_ops,
> +	/* The struct_ops's function may switch to another struct_ops.
> +	 *
> +	 * For example, bpf_tcp_cc_x->init() may switch to
> +	 * another tcp_cc_y by calling
> +	 * setsockopt(TCP_CONGESTION, "tcp_cc_y").
> +	 * During the switch,  bpf_struct_ops_put(tcp_cc_x) is called
> +	 * and its refcount may reach 0 which then free its
> +	 * trampoline image while tcp_cc_x is still running.
> +	 *
> +	 * A vanilla rcu gp is to wait for all bpf-tcp-cc prog
> +	 * to finish. bpf-tcp-cc prog is non sleepable.
> +	 * A rcu_tasks gp is to wait for the last few insn
> +	 * in the tramopline image to finish before releasing
> +	 * the trampoline image.
> +	 */
> +	.free_after_tasks_rcu_gp = true,
>  	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
>  };
>  


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-13 19:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-06 17:19 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/15] bpf: A common way to attach struct_ops to a cgroup Amery Hung
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/15] bpf: Remove __rcu tagging in st_link->map Amery Hung
2026-07-13 19:02   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/15] bpf: Make struct_ops tasks_rcu grace period optional Amery Hung
2026-07-13 19:01   ` Emil Tsalapatis [this message]
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/15] bpf: Add bpf_struct_ops accessor helpers Amery Hung
2026-07-13 20:36   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/15] bpf: Remove unnecessary prog_list_prog() check Amery Hung
2026-07-13 20:35   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/15] bpf: Replace prog_list_prog() check with direct pl->prog and pl->link check Amery Hung
2026-07-13 21:27   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/15] bpf: Add prog_list_init_item(), prog_list_replace_item(), and prog_list_id() Amery Hung
2026-07-13 21:56   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/15] bpf: Move LSM trampoline unlink into bpf_cgroup_link_auto_detach() Amery Hung
2026-07-13 21:57   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/15] bpf: Add a few bpf_cgroup_array_* helper functions Amery Hung
2026-07-13 21:57   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/15] bpf: Add infrastructure to support attaching struct_ops to cgroups Amery Hung
2026-07-14  6:21   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/15] bpf: Allow all struct_ops to use bpf_dynptr_from_skb() Amery Hung
2026-07-14  6:23   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/15] bpf: tcp: Support selected sock_ops callbacks as struct_ops Amery Hung
2026-07-06 18:28   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-06 23:11     ` Amery Hung
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/15] bpf: tcp: Support parse/len/write header option hooks in bpf_tcp_ops Amery Hung
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 13/15] libbpf: Support attaching struct_ops to a cgroup Amery Hung
2026-07-14  6:48   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/15] selftests/bpf: Test " Amery Hung
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 15/15] selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_tcp_ops header option hooks Amery Hung

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DJXOBRV3S89L.3OLMFO3UY0WS8@etsalapatis.com \
    --to=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox