From: "Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>
To: "Amery Hung" <ameryhung@gmail.com>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
<andrii@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
<memxor@gmail.com>, <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
<shakeel.butt@linux.dev>, <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
<kuniyu@google.com>, <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>,
<kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/15] bpf: Replace prog_list_prog() check with direct pl->prog and pl->link check
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 17:27:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DJXRFQTMYRTX.16Q66ORKV2WCA@etsalapatis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706171918.317102-6-ameryhung@gmail.com>
On Mon Jul 6, 2026 at 1:19 PM EDT, Amery Hung wrote:
> From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
>
> prog_list_length() and compute_effective_progs() use !prog_list_prog(pl)
> to skip a 'detaching' pl.
>
> When pl->link is not NULL, prog_list_prog(pl) returns
> the pl->link->link.prog. This does not work for the upcoming struct_ops
> patch where pl->link is not NULL but pl->link->link.prog is NULL,
> because a struct_ops map is attached to the cgroup instead of a BPF prog.
>
> To prepare for the upcoming struct_ops patch, this patch
> replaces the prog_list_prog() test with the
> "!pl->prog && !pl->link". In __cgroup_bpf_detach(),
> both pl->prog and pl->link are set to NULL, so testing
> "!pl->prog && !pl->link" is the same test to tell
> if a pl is being detached. This change should be a no-op.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
This change itself is ok, but now prog_list_prog never returns NULL
under normal operation AFAICT. Can we add error handling in the
remaining two call sites? prog_list_id() especially, since it blindly
dereferences the result like so:
return prog_list_prog(pl)->aux->id;
Imo it's worth it even if the code gets slightly more verbose.
> ---
> kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> index b64f6757096c..b100c04cb9c8 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> @@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ static u32 prog_list_length(struct hlist_head *head, int *preorder_cnt)
> u32 cnt = 0;
>
> hlist_for_each_entry(pl, head, node) {
> - if (!prog_list_prog(pl))
> + if (!pl->prog && !pl->link)
> continue;
> if (preorder_cnt && (pl->flags & BPF_F_PREORDER))
> (*preorder_cnt)++;
> @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ static int compute_effective_progs(struct cgroup *cgrp,
>
> init_bstart = bstart;
> hlist_for_each_entry(pl, &p->bpf.progs[atype], node) {
> - if (!prog_list_prog(pl))
> + if (!pl->prog && !pl->link)
> continue;
>
> if (pl->flags & BPF_F_PREORDER) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-13 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 17:19 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/15] bpf: A common way to attach struct_ops to a cgroup Amery Hung
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/15] bpf: Remove __rcu tagging in st_link->map Amery Hung
2026-07-13 19:02 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/15] bpf: Make struct_ops tasks_rcu grace period optional Amery Hung
2026-07-13 19:01 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/15] bpf: Add bpf_struct_ops accessor helpers Amery Hung
2026-07-13 20:36 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/15] bpf: Remove unnecessary prog_list_prog() check Amery Hung
2026-07-13 20:35 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/15] bpf: Replace prog_list_prog() check with direct pl->prog and pl->link check Amery Hung
2026-07-13 21:27 ` Emil Tsalapatis [this message]
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/15] bpf: Add prog_list_init_item(), prog_list_replace_item(), and prog_list_id() Amery Hung
2026-07-13 21:56 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/15] bpf: Move LSM trampoline unlink into bpf_cgroup_link_auto_detach() Amery Hung
2026-07-13 21:57 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/15] bpf: Add a few bpf_cgroup_array_* helper functions Amery Hung
2026-07-13 21:57 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/15] bpf: Add infrastructure to support attaching struct_ops to cgroups Amery Hung
2026-07-14 6:21 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/15] bpf: Allow all struct_ops to use bpf_dynptr_from_skb() Amery Hung
2026-07-14 6:23 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/15] bpf: tcp: Support selected sock_ops callbacks as struct_ops Amery Hung
2026-07-06 18:28 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-06 23:11 ` Amery Hung
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/15] bpf: tcp: Support parse/len/write header option hooks in bpf_tcp_ops Amery Hung
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 13/15] libbpf: Support attaching struct_ops to a cgroup Amery Hung
2026-07-14 6:48 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/15] selftests/bpf: Test " Amery Hung
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 15/15] selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_tcp_ops header option hooks Amery Hung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DJXRFQTMYRTX.16Q66ORKV2WCA@etsalapatis.com \
--to=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox