Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>
To: "Amery Hung" <ameryhung@gmail.com>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	<andrii@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	<memxor@gmail.com>, <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
	<shakeel.butt@linux.dev>, <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	<kuniyu@google.com>, <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>,
	<kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/15] bpf: Add a few bpf_cgroup_array_* helper functions
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 17:57:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DJXS2O9LFN5T.8BCWIJOB6N4M@etsalapatis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706171918.317102-9-ameryhung@gmail.com>

On Mon Jul 6, 2026 at 1:19 PM EDT, Amery Hung wrote:
> From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
>
> In the upcoming patch, the array can store a struct_ops map.
> The array could have a cfi_stubs acting as a dummy instead of
> the dummy_bpf_prog. The array logic will need to skip the cfi_stubs
> also in order to support storing struct_ops map in the array.
>
> bpf_cgroup_array_length(), bpf_cgroup_array_copy_to_user(), and
> bpf_cgroup_array_delete_safe_at() are added as a preparation work
> to allow skipping the cfi_stubs in the upcoming patch. This patch
> only skips the dummy_bpf_prog which is the same as the existing behavior.
> The current bpf_prog_array_*() callers are changed to call the new
> bpf_cgroup_array_*(). This is a no-op change.
>
> Unlike bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user(), bpf_cgroup_array_copy_to_user()
> does not need a temporary buffer. The cgroup caller already holds
> cgroup_mutex and dereferences the effective array with
> rcu_dereference_protected(), so it does not copy to userspace
> from an RCU read-side critical section. Details in commit 0911287ce32b.
>
> Another addition is the bpf_cgroup_array_free(). This prepares
> the array to have a different rcu gp for the struct_ops use case,
> for example, a struct_ops could have mix of sleepable ops and
> non-sleepable ops. In this patch, bpf_cgroup_array_free() only
> goes through the regular rcu gp. This is a no-op change also.
>
> bpf_prog_dummy() is also added to return the global dummy_bpf_prog.
>
> bpf_cgroup_array_dummy() is added to decide the sentinel based on atype.
> It now always returns bpf_prog_dummy(). In the upcoming patch,
> it can return a cfi_stubs if the atype belongs to a struct_ops.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>

One style issue below.

> ---
>  include/linux/bpf.h |  1 +
>  kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  kernel/bpf/core.c   |  5 +++
>  3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index 047ffc029666..e371a4733135 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -2561,6 +2561,7 @@ int bpf_prog_array_copy(struct bpf_prog_array *old_array,
>  			struct bpf_prog *include_prog,
>  			u64 bpf_cookie,
>  			struct bpf_prog_array **new_array);
> +struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_dummy(void);
>  
>  struct bpf_run_ctx {};
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> index 7abbe12e108f..081d81de1816 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> @@ -319,6 +319,67 @@ static void bpf_cgroup_link_auto_detach(struct bpf_cgroup_link *link)
>  	link->cgroup = NULL;
>  }
>  
> +static void bpf_cgroup_array_free(struct bpf_prog_array *array)
> +{
> +	if (!array || array == &bpf_empty_prog_array)
> +		return;
> +	kfree_rcu(array, rcu);
> +}
> +
> +static void *bpf_cgroup_array_dummy(enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type atype)
> +{
> +	return bpf_prog_dummy();
> +}
> +
> +static int bpf_cgroup_array_length(struct bpf_prog_array *array,
> +				   enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type atype)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_prog_array_item *item;
> +	int cnt = 0;
> +
> +	for (item = array->items; item->prog; item++)
> +		if (item->prog != bpf_cgroup_array_dummy(atype))
> +			cnt++;

The outer parenthesis needs braces since its body is an if-statement.

> +
> +	return cnt;
> +}
> +
> +static int bpf_cgroup_array_copy_to_user(struct bpf_prog_array *array,
> +					 __u32 __user *prog_ids, int cnt,
> +					 enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type atype)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_prog_array_item *item;
> +	int i = 0;
> +	u32 id;
> +
> +	for (item = array->items; item->prog && i < cnt; item++) {
> +		if (item->prog == bpf_cgroup_array_dummy(atype))
> +			continue;
> +		id = item->prog->aux->id;
> +		if (copy_to_user(prog_ids + i, &id, sizeof(id)))
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +		i++;
> +	}
> +	return item->prog ? -ENOSPC : 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int bpf_cgroup_array_delete_safe_at(struct bpf_prog_array *array,
> +					   int index, enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type atype)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_prog_array_item *item;
> +
> +	for (item = array->items; item->prog; item++) {
> +		if (item->prog == bpf_cgroup_array_dummy(atype))
> +			continue;
> +		if (!index) {
> +			WRITE_ONCE(item->prog, bpf_cgroup_array_dummy(atype));
> +			return 0;
> +		}
> +		index--;
> +	}
> +	return -ENOENT;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * cgroup_bpf_release() - put references of all bpf programs and
>   *                        release all cgroup bpf data
> @@ -356,7 +417,7 @@ static void cgroup_bpf_release(struct work_struct *work)
>  		old_array = rcu_dereference_protected(
>  				cgrp->bpf.effective[atype],
>  				lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex));
> -		bpf_prog_array_free(old_array);
> +		bpf_cgroup_array_free(old_array);
>  	}
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(storage, stmp, storages, list_cg) {
> @@ -530,7 +591,7 @@ static void activate_effective_progs(struct cgroup *cgrp,
>  	/* free prog array after grace period, since __cgroup_bpf_run_*()
>  	 * might be still walking the array
>  	 */
> -	bpf_prog_array_free(old_array);
> +	bpf_cgroup_array_free(old_array);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -570,7 +631,7 @@ static int cgroup_bpf_inherit(struct cgroup *cgrp)
>  	return 0;
>  cleanup:
>  	for (i = 0; i < NR; i++)
> -		bpf_prog_array_free(arrays[i]);
> +		bpf_cgroup_array_free(arrays[i]);
>  
>  	for (p = cgroup_parent(cgrp); p; p = cgroup_parent(p))
>  		cgroup_bpf_put(p);
> @@ -625,7 +686,7 @@ static int update_effective_progs(struct cgroup *cgrp,
>  
>  		if (percpu_ref_is_zero(&desc->bpf.refcnt)) {
>  			if (unlikely(desc->bpf.inactive)) {
> -				bpf_prog_array_free(desc->bpf.inactive);
> +				bpf_cgroup_array_free(desc->bpf.inactive);
>  				desc->bpf.inactive = NULL;
>  			}
>  			continue;
> @@ -644,7 +705,7 @@ static int update_effective_progs(struct cgroup *cgrp,
>  	css_for_each_descendant_pre(css, &cgrp->self) {
>  		struct cgroup *desc = container_of(css, struct cgroup, self);
>  
> -		bpf_prog_array_free(desc->bpf.inactive);
> +		bpf_cgroup_array_free(desc->bpf.inactive);
>  		desc->bpf.inactive = NULL;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1166,7 +1227,7 @@ static void purge_effective_progs(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct bpf_prog_list *pl,
>  				lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex));
>  
>  		/* Remove the program from the array */
> -		WARN_ONCE(bpf_prog_array_delete_safe_at(progs, pos),
> +		WARN_ONCE(bpf_cgroup_array_delete_safe_at(progs, pos, atype),
>  			  "Failed to purge a prog from array at index %d", pos);
>  	}
>  }
> @@ -1296,7 +1357,7 @@ static int __cgroup_bpf_query(struct cgroup *cgrp, const union bpf_attr *attr,
>  		if (effective_query) {
>  			effective = rcu_dereference_protected(cgrp->bpf.effective[atype],
>  							      lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex));
> -			total_cnt += bpf_prog_array_length(effective);
> +			total_cnt += bpf_cgroup_array_length(effective, atype);
>  		} else {
>  			total_cnt += prog_list_length(&cgrp->bpf.progs[atype], NULL);
>  		}
> @@ -1326,8 +1387,8 @@ static int __cgroup_bpf_query(struct cgroup *cgrp, const union bpf_attr *attr,
>  		if (effective_query) {
>  			effective = rcu_dereference_protected(cgrp->bpf.effective[atype],
>  							      lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex));
> -			cnt = min_t(int, bpf_prog_array_length(effective), total_cnt);
> -			ret = bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user(effective, prog_ids, cnt);
> +			cnt = min_t(int, bpf_cgroup_array_length(effective, atype), total_cnt);
> +			ret = bpf_cgroup_array_copy_to_user(effective, prog_ids, cnt, atype);
>  		} else {
>  			struct hlist_head *progs;
>  			struct bpf_prog_list *pl;
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> index 649cce41e13f..1837bb7bb4e9 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> @@ -2740,6 +2740,11 @@ void bpf_prog_array_free_sleepable(struct bpf_prog_array *progs)
>  	call_rcu_tasks_trace(&progs->rcu, __bpf_prog_array_free_sleepable_cb);
>  }
>  
> +struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_dummy(void)
> +{
> +	return &dummy_bpf_prog.prog;
> +}
> +
>  int bpf_prog_array_length(struct bpf_prog_array *array)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_prog_array_item *item;


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-13 21:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-06 17:19 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/15] bpf: A common way to attach struct_ops to a cgroup Amery Hung
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/15] bpf: Remove __rcu tagging in st_link->map Amery Hung
2026-07-13 19:02   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/15] bpf: Make struct_ops tasks_rcu grace period optional Amery Hung
2026-07-13 19:01   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/15] bpf: Add bpf_struct_ops accessor helpers Amery Hung
2026-07-13 20:36   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/15] bpf: Remove unnecessary prog_list_prog() check Amery Hung
2026-07-13 20:35   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/15] bpf: Replace prog_list_prog() check with direct pl->prog and pl->link check Amery Hung
2026-07-13 21:27   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/15] bpf: Add prog_list_init_item(), prog_list_replace_item(), and prog_list_id() Amery Hung
2026-07-13 21:56   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/15] bpf: Move LSM trampoline unlink into bpf_cgroup_link_auto_detach() Amery Hung
2026-07-13 21:57   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/15] bpf: Add a few bpf_cgroup_array_* helper functions Amery Hung
2026-07-13 21:57   ` Emil Tsalapatis [this message]
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/15] bpf: Add infrastructure to support attaching struct_ops to cgroups Amery Hung
2026-07-14  6:21   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/15] bpf: Allow all struct_ops to use bpf_dynptr_from_skb() Amery Hung
2026-07-14  6:23   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/15] bpf: tcp: Support selected sock_ops callbacks as struct_ops Amery Hung
2026-07-06 18:28   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-06 23:11     ` Amery Hung
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/15] bpf: tcp: Support parse/len/write header option hooks in bpf_tcp_ops Amery Hung
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 13/15] libbpf: Support attaching struct_ops to a cgroup Amery Hung
2026-07-14  6:48   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/15] selftests/bpf: Test " Amery Hung
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 15/15] selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_tcp_ops header option hooks Amery Hung

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DJXS2O9LFN5T.8BCWIJOB6N4M@etsalapatis.com \
    --to=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox