From: "Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>
To: "Amery Hung" <ameryhung@gmail.com>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
<andrii@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
<memxor@gmail.com>, <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
<shakeel.butt@linux.dev>, <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
<kuniyu@google.com>, <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>,
<kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/15] bpf: Add a few bpf_cgroup_array_* helper functions
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 17:57:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DJXS2O9LFN5T.8BCWIJOB6N4M@etsalapatis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706171918.317102-9-ameryhung@gmail.com>
On Mon Jul 6, 2026 at 1:19 PM EDT, Amery Hung wrote:
> From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
>
> In the upcoming patch, the array can store a struct_ops map.
> The array could have a cfi_stubs acting as a dummy instead of
> the dummy_bpf_prog. The array logic will need to skip the cfi_stubs
> also in order to support storing struct_ops map in the array.
>
> bpf_cgroup_array_length(), bpf_cgroup_array_copy_to_user(), and
> bpf_cgroup_array_delete_safe_at() are added as a preparation work
> to allow skipping the cfi_stubs in the upcoming patch. This patch
> only skips the dummy_bpf_prog which is the same as the existing behavior.
> The current bpf_prog_array_*() callers are changed to call the new
> bpf_cgroup_array_*(). This is a no-op change.
>
> Unlike bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user(), bpf_cgroup_array_copy_to_user()
> does not need a temporary buffer. The cgroup caller already holds
> cgroup_mutex and dereferences the effective array with
> rcu_dereference_protected(), so it does not copy to userspace
> from an RCU read-side critical section. Details in commit 0911287ce32b.
>
> Another addition is the bpf_cgroup_array_free(). This prepares
> the array to have a different rcu gp for the struct_ops use case,
> for example, a struct_ops could have mix of sleepable ops and
> non-sleepable ops. In this patch, bpf_cgroup_array_free() only
> goes through the regular rcu gp. This is a no-op change also.
>
> bpf_prog_dummy() is also added to return the global dummy_bpf_prog.
>
> bpf_cgroup_array_dummy() is added to decide the sentinel based on atype.
> It now always returns bpf_prog_dummy(). In the upcoming patch,
> it can return a cfi_stubs if the atype belongs to a struct_ops.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
One style issue below.
> ---
> include/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
> kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> kernel/bpf/core.c | 5 +++
> 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index 047ffc029666..e371a4733135 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -2561,6 +2561,7 @@ int bpf_prog_array_copy(struct bpf_prog_array *old_array,
> struct bpf_prog *include_prog,
> u64 bpf_cookie,
> struct bpf_prog_array **new_array);
> +struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_dummy(void);
>
> struct bpf_run_ctx {};
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> index 7abbe12e108f..081d81de1816 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> @@ -319,6 +319,67 @@ static void bpf_cgroup_link_auto_detach(struct bpf_cgroup_link *link)
> link->cgroup = NULL;
> }
>
> +static void bpf_cgroup_array_free(struct bpf_prog_array *array)
> +{
> + if (!array || array == &bpf_empty_prog_array)
> + return;
> + kfree_rcu(array, rcu);
> +}
> +
> +static void *bpf_cgroup_array_dummy(enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type atype)
> +{
> + return bpf_prog_dummy();
> +}
> +
> +static int bpf_cgroup_array_length(struct bpf_prog_array *array,
> + enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type atype)
> +{
> + struct bpf_prog_array_item *item;
> + int cnt = 0;
> +
> + for (item = array->items; item->prog; item++)
> + if (item->prog != bpf_cgroup_array_dummy(atype))
> + cnt++;
The outer parenthesis needs braces since its body is an if-statement.
> +
> + return cnt;
> +}
> +
> +static int bpf_cgroup_array_copy_to_user(struct bpf_prog_array *array,
> + __u32 __user *prog_ids, int cnt,
> + enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type atype)
> +{
> + struct bpf_prog_array_item *item;
> + int i = 0;
> + u32 id;
> +
> + for (item = array->items; item->prog && i < cnt; item++) {
> + if (item->prog == bpf_cgroup_array_dummy(atype))
> + continue;
> + id = item->prog->aux->id;
> + if (copy_to_user(prog_ids + i, &id, sizeof(id)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + i++;
> + }
> + return item->prog ? -ENOSPC : 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int bpf_cgroup_array_delete_safe_at(struct bpf_prog_array *array,
> + int index, enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type atype)
> +{
> + struct bpf_prog_array_item *item;
> +
> + for (item = array->items; item->prog; item++) {
> + if (item->prog == bpf_cgroup_array_dummy(atype))
> + continue;
> + if (!index) {
> + WRITE_ONCE(item->prog, bpf_cgroup_array_dummy(atype));
> + return 0;
> + }
> + index--;
> + }
> + return -ENOENT;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * cgroup_bpf_release() - put references of all bpf programs and
> * release all cgroup bpf data
> @@ -356,7 +417,7 @@ static void cgroup_bpf_release(struct work_struct *work)
> old_array = rcu_dereference_protected(
> cgrp->bpf.effective[atype],
> lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex));
> - bpf_prog_array_free(old_array);
> + bpf_cgroup_array_free(old_array);
> }
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(storage, stmp, storages, list_cg) {
> @@ -530,7 +591,7 @@ static void activate_effective_progs(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> /* free prog array after grace period, since __cgroup_bpf_run_*()
> * might be still walking the array
> */
> - bpf_prog_array_free(old_array);
> + bpf_cgroup_array_free(old_array);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -570,7 +631,7 @@ static int cgroup_bpf_inherit(struct cgroup *cgrp)
> return 0;
> cleanup:
> for (i = 0; i < NR; i++)
> - bpf_prog_array_free(arrays[i]);
> + bpf_cgroup_array_free(arrays[i]);
>
> for (p = cgroup_parent(cgrp); p; p = cgroup_parent(p))
> cgroup_bpf_put(p);
> @@ -625,7 +686,7 @@ static int update_effective_progs(struct cgroup *cgrp,
>
> if (percpu_ref_is_zero(&desc->bpf.refcnt)) {
> if (unlikely(desc->bpf.inactive)) {
> - bpf_prog_array_free(desc->bpf.inactive);
> + bpf_cgroup_array_free(desc->bpf.inactive);
> desc->bpf.inactive = NULL;
> }
> continue;
> @@ -644,7 +705,7 @@ static int update_effective_progs(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> css_for_each_descendant_pre(css, &cgrp->self) {
> struct cgroup *desc = container_of(css, struct cgroup, self);
>
> - bpf_prog_array_free(desc->bpf.inactive);
> + bpf_cgroup_array_free(desc->bpf.inactive);
> desc->bpf.inactive = NULL;
> }
>
> @@ -1166,7 +1227,7 @@ static void purge_effective_progs(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct bpf_prog_list *pl,
> lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex));
>
> /* Remove the program from the array */
> - WARN_ONCE(bpf_prog_array_delete_safe_at(progs, pos),
> + WARN_ONCE(bpf_cgroup_array_delete_safe_at(progs, pos, atype),
> "Failed to purge a prog from array at index %d", pos);
> }
> }
> @@ -1296,7 +1357,7 @@ static int __cgroup_bpf_query(struct cgroup *cgrp, const union bpf_attr *attr,
> if (effective_query) {
> effective = rcu_dereference_protected(cgrp->bpf.effective[atype],
> lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex));
> - total_cnt += bpf_prog_array_length(effective);
> + total_cnt += bpf_cgroup_array_length(effective, atype);
> } else {
> total_cnt += prog_list_length(&cgrp->bpf.progs[atype], NULL);
> }
> @@ -1326,8 +1387,8 @@ static int __cgroup_bpf_query(struct cgroup *cgrp, const union bpf_attr *attr,
> if (effective_query) {
> effective = rcu_dereference_protected(cgrp->bpf.effective[atype],
> lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex));
> - cnt = min_t(int, bpf_prog_array_length(effective), total_cnt);
> - ret = bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user(effective, prog_ids, cnt);
> + cnt = min_t(int, bpf_cgroup_array_length(effective, atype), total_cnt);
> + ret = bpf_cgroup_array_copy_to_user(effective, prog_ids, cnt, atype);
> } else {
> struct hlist_head *progs;
> struct bpf_prog_list *pl;
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> index 649cce41e13f..1837bb7bb4e9 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> @@ -2740,6 +2740,11 @@ void bpf_prog_array_free_sleepable(struct bpf_prog_array *progs)
> call_rcu_tasks_trace(&progs->rcu, __bpf_prog_array_free_sleepable_cb);
> }
>
> +struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_dummy(void)
> +{
> + return &dummy_bpf_prog.prog;
> +}
> +
> int bpf_prog_array_length(struct bpf_prog_array *array)
> {
> struct bpf_prog_array_item *item;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-13 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 17:19 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/15] bpf: A common way to attach struct_ops to a cgroup Amery Hung
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/15] bpf: Remove __rcu tagging in st_link->map Amery Hung
2026-07-13 19:02 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/15] bpf: Make struct_ops tasks_rcu grace period optional Amery Hung
2026-07-13 19:01 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/15] bpf: Add bpf_struct_ops accessor helpers Amery Hung
2026-07-13 20:36 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/15] bpf: Remove unnecessary prog_list_prog() check Amery Hung
2026-07-13 20:35 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/15] bpf: Replace prog_list_prog() check with direct pl->prog and pl->link check Amery Hung
2026-07-13 21:27 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/15] bpf: Add prog_list_init_item(), prog_list_replace_item(), and prog_list_id() Amery Hung
2026-07-13 21:56 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/15] bpf: Move LSM trampoline unlink into bpf_cgroup_link_auto_detach() Amery Hung
2026-07-13 21:57 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/15] bpf: Add a few bpf_cgroup_array_* helper functions Amery Hung
2026-07-13 21:57 ` Emil Tsalapatis [this message]
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/15] bpf: Add infrastructure to support attaching struct_ops to cgroups Amery Hung
2026-07-14 6:21 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/15] bpf: Allow all struct_ops to use bpf_dynptr_from_skb() Amery Hung
2026-07-14 6:23 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/15] bpf: tcp: Support selected sock_ops callbacks as struct_ops Amery Hung
2026-07-06 18:28 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-06 23:11 ` Amery Hung
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/15] bpf: tcp: Support parse/len/write header option hooks in bpf_tcp_ops Amery Hung
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 13/15] libbpf: Support attaching struct_ops to a cgroup Amery Hung
2026-07-14 6:48 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/15] selftests/bpf: Test " Amery Hung
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 15/15] selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_tcp_ops header option hooks Amery Hung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DJXS2O9LFN5T.8BCWIJOB6N4M@etsalapatis.com \
--to=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox