Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>
To: "Amery Hung" <ameryhung@gmail.com>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	<andrii@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	<memxor@gmail.com>, <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
	<shakeel.butt@linux.dev>, <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	<kuniyu@google.com>, <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>,
	<kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/15] bpf: Add bpf_struct_ops accessor helpers
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 16:36:44 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DJXQCZA5YIMR.I9BWPXFXAMQ7@etsalapatis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706171918.317102-4-ameryhung@gmail.com>

On Mon Jul 6, 2026 at 1:19 PM EDT, Amery Hung wrote:
> From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
>
> Add the helper functions bpf_struct_ops_map_kdata() and
> bpf_struct_ops_map_cfi_stubs() in bpf_struct_ops.c. They will be called
> from cgroup.c in the upcoming patch to create a struct_ops to cgroup
> attachment link.
>
> bpf_struct_ops_valid_to_reg() is also exposed for the upcoming caller
> in cgroup.c.
>
> The link update validation is also refactored into a new function
> bpf_struct_ops_link_update_check() such that it can be reused by the
> caller in cgroup.c in the upcoming patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>

> ---
>  include/linux/bpf.h         | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index 7ac8873839f4..047ffc029666 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -2252,6 +2252,12 @@ u32 bpf_struct_ops_id(const void *kdata);
>  int bpf_struct_ops_for_each_prog(const void *kdata,
>  				 int (*cb)(struct bpf_prog *prog, void *data),
>  				 void *data);
> +void *bpf_struct_ops_map_kdata(struct bpf_map *map);
> +u32 bpf_struct_ops_kdata_map_id(void *kdata);
> +void *bpf_struct_ops_map_cfi_stubs(struct bpf_map *map);
> +bool bpf_struct_ops_valid_to_reg(struct bpf_map *map);
> +int bpf_struct_ops_link_update_check(struct bpf_map *new_map, struct bpf_map *old_map,
> +				     struct bpf_map *expected_old_map);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NET
>  /* Define it here to avoid the use of forward declaration */
> @@ -2316,6 +2322,28 @@ static inline void bpf_map_struct_ops_info_fill(struct bpf_map_info *info, struc
>  static inline void bpf_struct_ops_desc_release(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc)
>  {
>  }
> +static inline void *bpf_struct_ops_map_kdata(struct bpf_map *map)
> +{
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +static inline u32 bpf_struct_ops_kdata_map_id(void *kdata)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +static inline void *bpf_struct_ops_map_cfi_stubs(struct bpf_map *map)
> +{
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +static inline bool bpf_struct_ops_valid_to_reg(struct bpf_map *map)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +static inline int bpf_struct_ops_link_update_check(struct bpf_map *new_map,
> +						   struct bpf_map *old_map,
> +						   struct bpf_map *expected_old_map)
> +{
> +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
>  
>  #endif
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
> index c422ce41873e..3d650a7e9f68 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
> @@ -1236,7 +1236,23 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_for_each_prog(const void *kdata,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_struct_ops_for_each_prog);
>  
> -static bool bpf_struct_ops_valid_to_reg(struct bpf_map *map)
> +void *bpf_struct_ops_map_kdata(struct bpf_map *map)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map;
> +
> +	st_map = container_of(map, struct bpf_struct_ops_map, map);
> +	return st_map->kvalue.data;
> +}
> +
> +void *bpf_struct_ops_map_cfi_stubs(struct bpf_map *map)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map;
> +
> +	st_map = container_of(map, struct bpf_struct_ops_map, map);
> +	return st_map->st_ops_desc->st_ops->cfi_stubs;
> +}
> +
> +bool bpf_struct_ops_valid_to_reg(struct bpf_map *map)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map = (struct bpf_struct_ops_map *)map;
>  
> @@ -1289,6 +1305,26 @@ static int bpf_struct_ops_map_link_fill_link_info(const struct bpf_link *link,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +int bpf_struct_ops_link_update_check(struct bpf_map *new_map,
> +				     struct bpf_map *old_map,
> +				     struct bpf_map *expected_old_map)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map, *old_st_map;
> +
> +	if (!old_map)
> +		return -ENOLINK;
> +	if (expected_old_map && old_map != expected_old_map)
> +		return -EPERM;
> +
> +	st_map = container_of(new_map, struct bpf_struct_ops_map, map);
> +	old_st_map = container_of(old_map, struct bpf_struct_ops_map, map);
> +	/* The new and old struct_ops must be the same type. */
> +	if (st_map->st_ops_desc != old_st_map->st_ops_desc)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int bpf_struct_ops_map_link_update(struct bpf_link *link, struct bpf_map *new_map,
>  					  struct bpf_map *expected_old_map)
>  {
> @@ -1307,23 +1343,12 @@ static int bpf_struct_ops_map_link_update(struct bpf_link *link, struct bpf_map
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&update_mutex);
> -
>  	old_map = st_link->map;
> -	if (!old_map) {
> -		err = -ENOLINK;
> -		goto err_out;
> -	}
> -	if (expected_old_map && old_map != expected_old_map) {
> -		err = -EPERM;
> +	err = bpf_struct_ops_link_update_check(new_map, old_map, expected_old_map);
> +	if (err)
>  		goto err_out;
> -	}
>  
>  	old_st_map = container_of(old_map, struct bpf_struct_ops_map, map);
> -	/* The new and old struct_ops must be the same type. */
> -	if (st_map->st_ops_desc != old_st_map->st_ops_desc) {
> -		err = -EINVAL;
> -		goto err_out;
> -	}
>  
>  	err = st_map->st_ops_desc->st_ops->update(st_map->kvalue.data, old_st_map->kvalue.data, link);
>  	if (err)


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-13 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-06 17:19 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/15] bpf: A common way to attach struct_ops to a cgroup Amery Hung
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/15] bpf: Remove __rcu tagging in st_link->map Amery Hung
2026-07-13 19:02   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/15] bpf: Make struct_ops tasks_rcu grace period optional Amery Hung
2026-07-13 19:01   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/15] bpf: Add bpf_struct_ops accessor helpers Amery Hung
2026-07-13 20:36   ` Emil Tsalapatis [this message]
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/15] bpf: Remove unnecessary prog_list_prog() check Amery Hung
2026-07-13 20:35   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/15] bpf: Replace prog_list_prog() check with direct pl->prog and pl->link check Amery Hung
2026-07-13 21:27   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/15] bpf: Add prog_list_init_item(), prog_list_replace_item(), and prog_list_id() Amery Hung
2026-07-13 21:56   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/15] bpf: Move LSM trampoline unlink into bpf_cgroup_link_auto_detach() Amery Hung
2026-07-13 21:57   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/15] bpf: Add a few bpf_cgroup_array_* helper functions Amery Hung
2026-07-13 21:57   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/15] bpf: Add infrastructure to support attaching struct_ops to cgroups Amery Hung
2026-07-14  6:21   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/15] bpf: Allow all struct_ops to use bpf_dynptr_from_skb() Amery Hung
2026-07-14  6:23   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/15] bpf: tcp: Support selected sock_ops callbacks as struct_ops Amery Hung
2026-07-06 18:28   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-06 23:11     ` Amery Hung
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/15] bpf: tcp: Support parse/len/write header option hooks in bpf_tcp_ops Amery Hung
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 13/15] libbpf: Support attaching struct_ops to a cgroup Amery Hung
2026-07-14  6:48   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/15] selftests/bpf: Test " Amery Hung
2026-07-06 17:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 15/15] selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_tcp_ops header option hooks Amery Hung

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DJXQCZA5YIMR.I9BWPXFXAMQ7@etsalapatis.com \
    --to=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox