Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Cc: Christophe Jaillet <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/sonic: Fix some resource leaks in error handling paths
Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 18:25:36 +1000 (AEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.22.394.2005101738510.11@nippy.intranet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9d279f21-6172-5318-4e29-061277e82157@web.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1743 bytes --]

On Sun, 10 May 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:

> Christophe Jaillet proposed to complete the exception handling also for this
> function implementation.
> I find that such a software correction is qualified for this tag.
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=e99332e7b4cda6e60f5b5916cf9943a79dbef902#n183
> 
> Corresponding consequences can vary then according to the change 
> management of involved developers.
> 

Makes sense.

> > I think 'undo_probe1' is both descriptive and consistent with commit 
> > 10e3cc180e64 ("net/sonic: Fix a resource leak in an error handling 
> > path in 'jazz_sonic_probe()'").
> 
> I can agree to this view (in principle).
> 
> By the way:
> The referenced commit contains the tag “Fixes”.
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1231354/
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200427061803.53857-1-christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr/
> 

Right, I'd forgotten that. Do you know when these bugs were introduced?

> > Your suggestion, 'free_dma' is also good.
> 
> Thanks for your positive feedback.
> 
> 
> > But coming up with good alternatives is easy.
> 
> But the change acceptance can occasionally become harder.
> 

The path to patch acceptance often takes surprising turns.

> 
> > If every good alternative would be considered there would be no 
> > obvious way to get a patch merged.
> 
> I imagine that some alternatives can result in preferable solutions, 
> can't they?

Naming goto labels is just painting another bikeshed. Yes, some 
alternatives are preferable but it takes too long to identify them and 
finding consensus is unlikely anyway, as it's a matter of taste.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-10  8:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-09  6:15 [PATCH] net/sonic: Fix some resource leaks in error handling paths Markus Elfring
2020-05-09 23:45 ` Finn Thain
2020-05-10  5:30   ` Markus Elfring
2020-05-10  8:25     ` Finn Thain [this message]
2020-05-10  9:07       ` Markus Elfring
2020-05-11  0:28         ` Finn Thain
2020-05-11  6:48           ` Markus Elfring
2020-05-12  0:08             ` Finn Thain
2020-05-12  6:38               ` Markus Elfring
2020-05-13  1:14                 ` Finn Thain
2020-05-13  5:07                   ` net/sonic: Software evolution around the application of coding standards Markus Elfring
2020-05-13 23:16                     ` Finn Thain
2020-05-11  8:20           ` net/sonic: Fix some resource leaks in error handling paths Markus Elfring
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-05-08 17:25 [PATCH] " Christophe JAILLET
2020-05-08 23:28 ` Finn Thain
2020-05-09  0:57 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-05-09  1:57   ` Finn Thain
2020-05-09  2:04     ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-05-09  1:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-05-09 16:47   ` Christophe JAILLET
2020-05-09 18:13     ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-05-09 20:31       ` Christophe JAILLET
2020-05-09 22:42       ` Joe Perches
2020-05-09 23:32         ` David Miller
2020-05-09 23:41           ` Joe Perches
2020-05-09 23:52   ` Finn Thain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.22.394.2005101738510.11@nippy.intranet \
    --to=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
    --cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox