From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Wang Zhan <wang.zhan@smartx.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, keyong.sun@smartx.com,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowangio@gmail.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>,
Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>,
dev@openvswitch.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Alice Mikityanska <alice@isovalent.com>,
David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
Wang Zhan <wang.zhan@smartx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/5] net: gso: support bounded TCP segmentation
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 19:39:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.17cae5207b64e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928044102.1004310-4-wang.zhan@smartx.com>
Wang Zhan wrote:
> The bounded resegmentation added by the next patch splits an oversized TCP
> GSO skb into several GSO skbs which fit the device limits. That needs the
> GSO engine to group several MSS segments into one output skb, so let
> callers bound the number of MSS segments each output skb carries and pass
> the bound through the existing __skb_gso_segment() entry point. Ordinary
> callers use zero for no limit.
>
> Without a bound, skb_segment() groups several MSS into one output skb only
> for a device which advertises NETIF_F_GSO_PARTIAL or for a skb with a
> frag_list which can be split into uniform pieces, and falls back to one
> segment per skb otherwise. A caller which passes a bound asks for the
> grouping regardless, so the block which makes that decision is skipped
> when max_segs is set. Callers which pass no bound keep it, and the bounded
> path only runs for skbs which carry no frag_list.
>
> The output stays a GSO skb: gso_size is the original MSS and gso_segs is
> the number of MSS it holds, so a downstream device can still perform
> ordinary TSO. Store the bound in the existing skb_gso_cb scratch context,
> alongside the call-local data_offset and mac_offset fields, so that the
> segmentation methods keep their signature. A zero max_segs value means
> that no bound is active; it is not a persistent skb flag.
>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Wang Zhan <wang.zhan@smartx.com>
>
> ---
> v3:
> - drop the tcp_gso_segment() exception: the caller keeps the features
> - cap the bound with GSO_MAX_SEGS instead of U16_MAX
> - drop the reset of the field in the output skbs: every caller initializes it
> - note in the kernel-doc that a bound is for TCP GSO skbs only
> - note at the frag_list gate that a bound must not go with a frag_list skb
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/20260918084651.3022878-3-wang.zhan@smartx.com/
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/20260917063854.2011613-3-wang.zhan@smartx.com/
> @@ -4839,7 +4840,13 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff *head_skb,
> csum = !!can_checksum_protocol(features, proto);
>
> if (sg && csum && !gso_by_frags) {
> - if (!(features & NETIF_F_GSO_PARTIAL)) {
> + /*
> + * A call with max_segs set groups the MSS segments below,
> + * and the frag_list split in this block does not carry the
> + * bound, so a bound must not be passed for a skb with a
> + * frag_list.
> + */
To me this comment confuses rather than helps.
For one, it refers to "the bound" without any context.
Probably just drop.
> + if (!max_segs && !(features & NETIF_F_GSO_PARTIAL)) {
> struct sk_buff *iter;
> unsigned int frag_len;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 4:40 [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] net: resegment oversized TCP GSO skbs Wang Zhan
2026-09-28 4:40 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/5] net: core: use the packet's L3 protocol for the GSO size limit Wang Zhan
2026-09-28 23:36 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-29 3:44 ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-29 4:01 ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-29 14:59 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-28 4:40 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/5] net: core: factor out the GSO device limit check Wang Zhan
2026-09-28 23:37 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-29 7:47 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-28 4:41 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/5] net: gso: support bounded TCP segmentation Wang Zhan
2026-09-28 23:39 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2026-09-30 4:41 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-28 4:41 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/5] net: core: resegment oversized TCP GSO skbs Wang Zhan
2026-09-28 23:47 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-29 10:25 ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-29 15:00 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-30 4:41 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-28 4:41 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/5] net: net_test: add tests for bounded GSO segmentation Wang Zhan
2026-09-28 23:59 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-29 10:30 ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-29 15:01 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-30 4:41 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-28 4:45 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] net: resegment oversized TCP GSO skbs netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-09-28 5:49 ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-28 23:34 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-29 7:27 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-29 11:50 ` Wang Zhan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.17cae5207b64e@gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=alice@isovalent.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
--cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
--cc=keyong.sun@smartx.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=wang.zhan@smartx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox