Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Wang Zhan <wang.zhan@smartx.com>,  netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net,  edumazet@google.com,  kuba@kernel.org,
	 pabeni@redhat.com,  horms@kernel.org,  keyong.sun@smartx.com,
	 Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
	 Jason Wang <jasowangio@gmail.com>,
	 Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	 Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
	 Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>,
	 Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>,
	 dev@openvswitch.org,  Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	 Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
	 Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
	 Alice Mikityanska <alice@isovalent.com>,
	 David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
	 Wang Zhan <wang.zhan@smartx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/5] net: core: factor out the GSO device limit check
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 19:37:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <willemdebruijn.kernel.1a1de2bef031b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928044102.1004310-3-wang.zhan@smartx.com>

Wang Zhan wrote:
> gso_features_check() decides whether an egress device can offload a GSO
> skb as a single TSO frame by comparing the segment count and the frame
> length against the device limits.  The resegmentation path added by a
> later patch caps the MSS segments per output skb and needs the same
> features computed without those limits, so put the two tests in a helper
> and gate them with one flag.
> 
> No functional changes.
> 
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Wang Zhan <wang.zhan@smartx.com>
> 
> ---
> v3:
> - rename the helper to gso_within_dev_limits
> - move the check_gso_limits flag and the wrapper split here from patch 4
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/20260918084651.3022878-2-wang.zhan@smartx.com/
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/20260917063854.2011613-2-wang.zhan@smartx.com/
> ---
>  net/core/dev.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index ffa9b0c27788c..d66b667071837 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -3834,17 +3834,19 @@ static bool skb_gso_has_extension_hdr(const struct sk_buff *skb)
>  			 skb_inner_network_header_len(skb) != sizeof(struct ipv6hdr)));
>  }
>  
> +static bool
> +gso_within_dev_limits(const struct sk_buff *skb, const struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	return skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs <= READ_ONCE(dev->gso_max_segs) &&
> +	       skb->len < netif_get_gso_max_size(dev, vlan_get_protocol(skb));

nit: keep the separate return statements as before. It's easier to read.
> +}
> +
>  static netdev_features_t gso_features_check(const struct sk_buff *skb,
>  					    struct net_device *dev,
> -					    netdev_features_t features)
> +					    netdev_features_t features,
> +					    bool check_limits)
>  {
> -	u16 gso_segs = skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs;
> -
> -	if (gso_segs > READ_ONCE(dev->gso_max_segs))
> -		return features & ~NETIF_F_GSO_MASK;
> -
> -	if (unlikely(skb->len >=
> -		     netif_get_gso_max_size(dev, vlan_get_protocol(skb))))
> +	if (check_limits && !gso_within_dev_limits(skb, dev))
>  		return features & ~NETIF_F_GSO_MASK;
>  
>  	if (!skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type) {
> @@ -3893,13 +3895,15 @@ static netdev_features_t gso_features_check(const struct sk_buff *skb,
>  	return features;
>  }
>  
> -netdev_features_t netif_skb_features(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +static netdev_features_t
> +__netif_skb_features(struct sk_buff *skb, bool check_gso_limits)
>  {
>  	struct net_device *dev = skb->dev;
>  	netdev_features_t features = dev->features;
>  
>  	if (skb_is_gso(skb))
> -		features = gso_features_check(skb, dev, features);
> +		features = gso_features_check(skb, dev, features,
> +					      check_gso_limits);
>  
>  	/* If encapsulation offload request, verify we are testing
>  	 * hardware encapsulation features instead of standard
> @@ -3922,6 +3926,11 @@ netdev_features_t netif_skb_features(struct sk_buff *skb)
>  
>  	return harmonize_features(skb, features);
>  }
> +
> +netdev_features_t netif_skb_features(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	return __netif_skb_features(skb, true);
> +}
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_skb_features);
>  
>  static int xmit_one(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> -- 
> 2.47.3
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-28 23:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-28  4:40 [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] net: resegment oversized TCP GSO skbs Wang Zhan
2026-09-28  4:40 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/5] net: core: use the packet's L3 protocol for the GSO size limit Wang Zhan
2026-09-28 23:36   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-29  3:44     ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-29  4:01     ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-29 14:59       ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-28  4:40 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/5] net: core: factor out the GSO device limit check Wang Zhan
2026-09-28 23:37   ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2026-09-29  7:47   ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-28  4:41 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/5] net: gso: support bounded TCP segmentation Wang Zhan
2026-09-28 23:39   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-30  4:41   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-28  4:41 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/5] net: core: resegment oversized TCP GSO skbs Wang Zhan
2026-09-28 23:47   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-29 10:25     ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-29 15:00       ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-30  4:41   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-28  4:41 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/5] net: net_test: add tests for bounded GSO segmentation Wang Zhan
2026-09-28 23:59   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-29 10:30     ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-29 15:01       ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-30  4:41   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-28  4:45 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] net: resegment oversized TCP GSO skbs netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-09-28  5:49   ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-28 23:34     ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-29  7:27       ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-29 11:50       ` Wang Zhan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=willemdebruijn.kernel.1a1de2bef031b@gmail.com \
    --to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=alice@isovalent.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
    --cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
    --cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
    --cc=keyong.sun@smartx.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=wang.zhan@smartx.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox