Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] u-boot recipe updates

[Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 17:01 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 12:14 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 11:00 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > > > > On a related note, is it possible to fix the mailing list so that it
> > > > > does not strip To/Cc information and Message-ID strings?  [I'd have to
> > > > > check -- maybe it is (also) inserting a needless Reply-To: header that
> > > > > messes things up.]
> > 
> > Your mail suffers the exact same problem.  My address is nowhere to be
> > seen on the To/Cc:  I only happened to see it since I told mutt to
> > show me all archived poky/oe mails with u-boot in the subject.
> > Otherwise your message would have been lost in the noise, perhaps seen
> > next week when I return from OOO.
> > 
> > And when I hit reply, it won't go to you unless I tell mutt to ignore
> > the broken Reply-To line.  It is the line right at the bottom:
> 
> Ah, I see.  So, just to be clear, the mailing list isn't stripping
> anything: the reason that your address doesn't appear in To/Cc is, as
> you suggest, purely because the Reply-to: header which mailman inserts
> tends to cause replies to be sent only to the list.
> 
> I tend to agree with you that the Reply-to header is a bad idea and it
> would be better off disabled, but this is a list policy decision and
> Richard, as the administrator, would need to decide whether he wants to
> disable it or not.

I'm fairly indifferent about this and happy to change it unless anyone
can think of a good reason why its list this. I would note that whilst
in theory I might admin the list, I don't have any of the list admin
password for this list or the tsc one for that matter, only that for
bitbake-devel. Phil, perhaps we could discuss this offline :)

Cheers,

Richard