[PATCH V2 0/6] Fixes to get oe-core building

[PATCH V2 0/6] Fixes to get oe-core building

[Khem Raj]

Hi


The attached patches are needed to get the OE core to build
Please provide feedback I have already incorporated the changes
requested thus far.

V2: Fix the sanity test case to check for new limit
    Add patch to link gcc cross statically with prerequisite libs
    Remove do_compile_prepend from sqlite3 upgrade

v3: Drop spurious dependency on ncurses-native for sqlite3 recipe
    Check if /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr is readable
    Fix rpm-native build issue encountered on ubuntu natty
    LINUXLIBCVERSION bump to 2.6.37.2

Thanks

-Khem

[PATCHv3 1/6] sqlite3: Update version 3.7.3 -> 3.7.5

[Khem Raj]

* Imported from OE commit a2c3af2d608b1b713018d688b00e03873a538993
* native version of 3.7.3 does not build

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
---
 meta/recipes-support/sqlite/sqlite3_3.7.3.bb |    8 --------
 meta/recipes-support/sqlite/sqlite3_3.7.5.bb |   10 ++++++++++
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/sqlite/sqlite3_3.7.3.bb
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/sqlite/sqlite3_3.7.5.bb

diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/sqlite/sqlite3_3.7.3.bb b/meta/recipes-support/sqlite/sqlite3_3.7.3.bb
deleted file mode 100644
index 7296aba..0000000
--- a/meta/recipes-support/sqlite/sqlite3_3.7.3.bb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
-require sqlite3.inc
-
-LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://src/main.c;endline=16;md5=86c9b824e9d68f8a26343a4b57f6d85a"
-
-PR = "r1"
-
-SRC_URI[md5sum] = "5437978aae90350cf984993091e0d695"
-SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "dbf352e8fbb74829f5e7a88f9f6ceeb80a709537f668c36e4b6cdfb271309ef6"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/sqlite/sqlite3_3.7.5.bb b/meta/recipes-support/sqlite/sqlite3_3.7.5.bb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..212d9e2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-support/sqlite/sqlite3_3.7.5.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+require sqlite3.inc
+
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://sqlite3.c;endline=19;md5=c1b8048b783961c3ba387c43fd955dc6"
+
+SRC_URI = "http://www.sqlite.org/sqlite-autoconf-3070500.tar.gz"
+S = "${WORKDIR}/sqlite-autoconf-3070500"
+PR = "r0"
+
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = "a9604a82613ade2e7f4c303f233e477f"                                                 
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "cb5b86926ec9f65882b2dddd244f2d620337d911ec73411863f77e48cf6a2f94"              
-- 
1.7.4.1

[PATCHv3 2/6] distro_tracking_fields.inc: Use 2.6.37.2 instead of 2.6.36 for linux-libc-headers

[Khem Raj]

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
---
 .../conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc
index 1dab90a..beb18e2 100644
--- a/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc
+++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc
@@ -2884,9 +2884,9 @@ RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-libtool = "Nov 8, 2010"
 RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-libtool = "Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>"
 
 RECIPE_STATUS_pn-linux-libc-headers="green" 
-RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-linux-libc-headers="2.6.36"
-RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-linux-libc-headers = "Nov 8, 2010"
-RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-linux-libc-headers = "Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>"
+RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-linux-libc-headers="2.6.37.2"
+RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-linux-libc-headers = "Mar 1, 2011"
+RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-linux-libc-headers = "Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>"
 
 RECIPE_STATUS_pn-lsof="green" 
 RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-lsof="4.84"
-- 
1.7.4.1

Re: [PATCHv3 2/6] distro_tracking_fields.inc: Use 2.6.37.2 instead of 2.6.36 for linux-libc-headers

[Khem Raj]

ping

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc |    6 +++---
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc
> index 1dab90a..beb18e2 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc
> +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc
> @@ -2884,9 +2884,9 @@ RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-libtool = "Nov 8, 2010"
>  RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-libtool = "Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>"
>
>  RECIPE_STATUS_pn-linux-libc-headers="green"
> -RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-linux-libc-headers="2.6.36"
> -RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-linux-libc-headers = "Nov 8, 2010"
> -RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-linux-libc-headers = "Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>"
> +RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-linux-libc-headers="2.6.37.2"
> +RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-linux-libc-headers = "Mar 1, 2011"
> +RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-linux-libc-headers = "Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>"
>
>  RECIPE_STATUS_pn-lsof="green"
>  RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-lsof="4.84"
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
>

Re: [PATCHv3 2/6] distro_tracking_fields.inc: Use 2.6.37.2 instead of 2.6.36 for linux-libc-headers

[Richard Purdie]

On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 22:39 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  .../conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc |    6 +++---
> >  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc
> > index 1dab90a..beb18e2 100644
> > --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc
> > +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc
> > @@ -2884,9 +2884,9 @@ RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-libtool = "Nov 8, 2010"
> >  RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-libtool = "Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>"
> >
> >  RECIPE_STATUS_pn-linux-libc-headers="green"
> > -RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-linux-libc-headers="2.6.36"
> > -RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-linux-libc-headers = "Nov 8, 2010"
> > -RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-linux-libc-headers = "Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>"
> > +RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-linux-libc-headers="2.6.37.2"
> > +RECIPE_LAST_UPDATE_pn-linux-libc-headers = "Mar 1, 2011"
> > +RECIPE_MAINTAINER_pn-linux-libc-headers = "Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>"
> >
> >  RECIPE_STATUS_pn-lsof="green"
> >  RECIPE_LATEST_VERSION_pn-lsof="4.84"
> > --
> > 1.7.4.1

With this patch, I need to work out who "owns" these tracking fields
going forwards and what the policy is regarding them. I'd like some
input from Saul on this although it might not happen until next week as
we're both travelling.

Cheers,

Richard

[PATCHv3 3/6] gcc: Statically link in support libraries e.g. libmpfr libgmp etc.

[Khem Raj]

* This is helpful to get consistent behaviour with gcc on different
  hosts and linking the libraries in for cross gcc recipes should not
  be increasing the binary size alarmingly

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
---
 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc |    7 +++++++
 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc  |   10 ++++++++++
 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-sdk.inc    |    8 ++++++++
 .../gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.3.3.bb                |    2 +-
 .../gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.5.1.bb                |    2 +-
 .../gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.3.3.bb                 |    2 +-
 .../gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.1.bb                 |    2 +-
 .../gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.3.3.bb            |    2 +-
 .../gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.5.1.bb            |    2 +-
 .../gcc/gcc-cross-kernel-3.4.4_csl-arm-2005q3.bb   |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.3.3.bb       |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.5.1.bb       |    2 +-
 .../gcc/gcc-cross_csl-arm-2008q1.bb                |    2 +-
 .../gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.3.3.bb              |    2 +-
 .../gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.5.1.bb              |    2 +-
 .../gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.3.3.bb         |    2 +-
 .../gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.5.1.bb         |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk_4.5.1.bb    |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.3.3.bb     |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.5.1.bb     |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.3.3.bb             |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.5.1.bb             |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_csl-arm-2008q1.bb    |    2 +-
 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_4.5.1.bb          |    2 +-
 24 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc
index 4393777..cdb69fb 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc
@@ -85,6 +85,11 @@ do_configure () {
 	export CXXFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_CXXFLAGS}"
 	export LDFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_LDFLAGS}"
 	export ARCH_FLAGS_FOR_TARGET="${ARCH_FLAGS_FOR_TARGET}"
+
+        # Make sure LDFLAGS are honored.
+        sed -i 's/^LDFLAGS = $/LDFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@/' ${S}/Makefile.in
+        sed -i 's/^LDFLAGS = $/LDFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
+
 	(cd ${S} && gnu-configize) || die "failure running gnu-configize"
 	
 	# teach gcc to find correct target includedir when checking libc ssp support
@@ -108,5 +113,7 @@ do_configure () {
 	echo "#endif /* ! GCC_DEFAULTS_H */" >> ${S}/gcc/defaults.h.new
 	mv ${S}/gcc/defaults.h.new ${S}/gcc/defaults.h
 	oe_runconf
+        # make sure that no @LDFLAG@ is left in the generated Makefile
+        sed -i "s/@LDFLAGS@//g" ${B}/Makefile
 }
 
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc
index 346d164..200cbe2 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc
@@ -16,6 +16,16 @@ do_compile_prepend () {
 	export LD_FOR_TARGET="${TARGET_SYS}-ld"
 	export NM_FOR_TARGET="${TARGET_SYS}-nm"
 	export CC_FOR_TARGET="${CCACHE} ${TARGET_SYS}-gcc ${TARGET_CC_ARCH}"
+	export OBJDUMP_FOR_TARGET="${TARGET_SYS}-objdump"
+	export OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET="${TARGET_SYS}-objcopy"
+	export STRIP_FOR_TARGET="${TARGET_SYS}-strip"
+	# Make sure we use GMP/MPFR statically
+	sed -i 's/^\(HOST_GMPLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
+	sed -i 's/^\(HOST_GMPLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
+	sed -i 's/^\(HOST_PPLLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
+	sed -i 's/^\(HOST_PPLLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
+	sed -i 's/^\(HOST_LIBELFLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
+	sed -i 's/^\(HOST_LIBELFLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
 }
 
 LIBGCCS_VAR = "-lgcc_s"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-sdk.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-sdk.inc
index 756e74e..3eb8992 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-sdk.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-sdk.inc
@@ -39,6 +39,14 @@ do_configure () {
 	export CPPFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_CPPFLAGS}"
 	export CXXFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_CXXFLAGS}"
 	export LDFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_LDFLAGS}"
+	export CC_FOR_TARGET="${CCACHE} ${TARGET_SYS}-gcc ${TARGET_CC_ARCH}"
+	# Make sure we use GMP/MPFR statically 
+	sed -i 's/^\(HOST_GMPLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
+	sed -i 's/^\(HOST_GMPLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
+	sed -i 's/^\(HOST_PPLLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl 
+	sed -i 's/^\(HOST_PPLLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
+	sed -i 's/^\(HOST_LIBELFLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
+	sed -i 's/^\(HOST_LIBELFLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
 	(cd ${S} && gnu-configize) || die "failure running gnu-configize"
 	oe_runconf
 }
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.3.3.bb
index d420f80..8bf07d7 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.3.3.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.3.3.bb
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ require gcc-cross-canadian.inc
 require gcc-configure-sdk.inc
 require gcc-package-sdk.inc
 
-PR = "r20"
+PR = "r21"
 
 DEPENDS += "gmp-nativesdk mpfr-nativesdk"
 RDEPENDS_${PN} += "mpfr-nativesdk"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.5.1.bb
index 3eea4bc..92708d4 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.5.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.5.1.bb
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ require gcc-cross-canadian.inc
 require gcc-configure-sdk.inc
 require gcc-package-sdk.inc
 
-PR = "r3"
+PR = "r4"
 
 DEPENDS += "gmp-nativesdk mpfr-nativesdk libmpc-nativesdk elfutils-nativesdk"
 RDEPENDS_${PN} += "mpfr-nativesdk libmpc-nativesdk elfutils-nativesdk"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.3.3.bb
index 28ac1ab..ef52845 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.3.3.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.3.3.bb
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 require gcc-cross_${PV}.bb
 require gcc-cross-initial.inc
 
-PR = "r5"
+PR = "r6"
 
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.1.bb
index b2c257d..38e0964 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.1.bb
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 require gcc-cross_${PV}.bb
 require gcc-cross-initial.inc
 
-PR = "r2"
+PR = "r3"
 
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
index a8473b0..deeee37 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 require gcc-cross_${PV}.bb
 require gcc-cross-intermediate.inc
-PR = "r5"
+PR = "r6"
 
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
index e65d5df..9a30cb5 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 require gcc-cross_${PV}.bb
 require gcc-cross-intermediate.inc
-PR = "r3"
+PR = "r4"
 
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-kernel-3.4.4_csl-arm-2005q3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-kernel-3.4.4_csl-arm-2005q3.bb
index 88e3842..462104f 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-kernel-3.4.4_csl-arm-2005q3.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-kernel-3.4.4_csl-arm-2005q3.bb
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ require gcc-cross-kernel.inc
 
 DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1"
 
-PR = "r4"
+PR = "r5"
 
 SRC_URI += "file://gcc-3.4.4-makefile-fix.patch;patch=1"
 
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.3.3.bb
index 5eaac5f..1a982f5 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.3.3.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.3.3.bb
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-PR = "r17"
+PR = "r18"
 
 require gcc-${PV}.inc
 require gcc-cross4.inc
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.5.1.bb
index 399cdf9..78bb05a 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.5.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.5.1.bb
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-PR = "r2"
+PR = "r3"
 
 require gcc-${PV}.inc
 require gcc-cross4.inc
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_csl-arm-2008q1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
index 89534f1..0e7a1ee 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-PR = "r5"
+PR = "r6"
 
 require gcc-csl-arm-2008q1.inc
 require gcc-cross4.inc
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.3.3.bb
index b42de47..d3ddcb1 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.3.3.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.3.3.bb
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 require gcc-cross-initial_${PV}.bb
 require gcc-crosssdk-initial.inc
-PR = "r6"
+PR = "r7"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.5.1.bb
index 240caf5..fec53b9 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.5.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.5.1.bb
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 require gcc-cross-initial_${PV}.bb
 require gcc-crosssdk-initial.inc
 
-PR = "r2"
+PR = "r3"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
index cd1f966..2be05f1 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 require gcc-cross-intermediate_${PV}.bb
 require gcc-crosssdk-intermediate.inc
-PR = "r8"
+PR = "r9"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
index a6653dd..161d870 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 require gcc-cross-intermediate_${PV}.bb
 require gcc-crosssdk-intermediate.inc
 
-PR = "r2"
+PR = "r3"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk_4.5.1.bb
index 129e8d3..7069088 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk_4.5.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk_4.5.1.bb
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 require gcc-cross_${PV}.bb
 require gcc-crosssdk.inc
 
-PR = "r2"
+PR = "r3"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.3.3.bb
index 99f927a..2f5cfb5 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.3.3.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.3.3.bb
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-PR = "r18"
+PR = "r19"
 
 require gcc-${PV}.inc
 require gcc-configure-runtime.inc
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.5.1.bb
index 093f9bf..c1e680d 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.5.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.5.1.bb
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-PR = "r2"
+PR = "r3"
 
 require gcc-${PV}.inc
 require gcc-configure-runtime.inc
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.3.3.bb
index f0471d4..ba6e7b2 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.3.3.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.3.3.bb
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-PR = "r11"
+PR = "r12"
 
 require gcc-${PV}.inc
 require gcc-configure-target.inc
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.5.1.bb
index 919d4b0..25e455c 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.5.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.5.1.bb
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-PR = "r2"
+PR = "r3"
 require gcc-${PV}.inc
 require gcc-configure-target.inc
 require gcc-package-target.inc
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_csl-arm-2008q1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
index cc7540a..2df12ef 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-PR = "r3"
+PR = "r4"
 
 require gcc-${PV}.inc
 require gcc-configure-target.inc
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_4.5.1.bb
index b6cf268..3f7ce0a 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_4.5.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_4.5.1.bb
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 require gcc-${PV}.inc
 
-PR = "r0"
+PR = "r1"
 
 INHIBIT_DEFAULT_DEPS = "1"
 DEPENDS = "virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}g++"
-- 
1.7.4.1

Re: [PATCHv3 3/6] gcc: Statically link in support libraries e.g. libmpfr libgmp etc.

[Khem Raj]

ping any opinion on this patch ?

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> * This is helpful to get consistent behaviour with gcc on different
>  hosts and linking the libraries in for cross gcc recipes should not
>  be increasing the binary size alarmingly
>
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
> ---
>  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc |    7 +++++++
>  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc  |   10 ++++++++++
>  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-sdk.inc    |    8 ++++++++
>  .../gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.3.3.bb                |    2 +-
>  .../gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.5.1.bb                |    2 +-
>  .../gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.3.3.bb                 |    2 +-
>  .../gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.1.bb                 |    2 +-
>  .../gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.3.3.bb            |    2 +-
>  .../gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.5.1.bb            |    2 +-
>  .../gcc/gcc-cross-kernel-3.4.4_csl-arm-2005q3.bb   |    2 +-
>  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.3.3.bb       |    2 +-
>  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.5.1.bb       |    2 +-
>  .../gcc/gcc-cross_csl-arm-2008q1.bb                |    2 +-
>  .../gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.3.3.bb              |    2 +-
>  .../gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.5.1.bb              |    2 +-
>  .../gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.3.3.bb         |    2 +-
>  .../gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.5.1.bb         |    2 +-
>  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk_4.5.1.bb    |    2 +-
>  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.3.3.bb     |    2 +-
>  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.5.1.bb     |    2 +-
>  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.3.3.bb             |    2 +-
>  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.5.1.bb             |    2 +-
>  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_csl-arm-2008q1.bb    |    2 +-
>  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_4.5.1.bb          |    2 +-
>  24 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc
> index 4393777..cdb69fb 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc
> @@ -85,6 +85,11 @@ do_configure () {
>        export CXXFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_CXXFLAGS}"
>        export LDFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_LDFLAGS}"
>        export ARCH_FLAGS_FOR_TARGET="${ARCH_FLAGS_FOR_TARGET}"
> +
> +        # Make sure LDFLAGS are honored.
> +        sed -i 's/^LDFLAGS = $/LDFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@/' ${S}/Makefile.in
> +        sed -i 's/^LDFLAGS = $/LDFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
> +
>        (cd ${S} && gnu-configize) || die "failure running gnu-configize"
>
>        # teach gcc to find correct target includedir when checking libc ssp support
> @@ -108,5 +113,7 @@ do_configure () {
>        echo "#endif /* ! GCC_DEFAULTS_H */" >> ${S}/gcc/defaults.h.new
>        mv ${S}/gcc/defaults.h.new ${S}/gcc/defaults.h
>        oe_runconf
> +        # make sure that no @LDFLAG@ is left in the generated Makefile
> +        sed -i "s/@LDFLAGS@//g" ${B}/Makefile
>  }
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc
> index 346d164..200cbe2 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc
> @@ -16,6 +16,16 @@ do_compile_prepend () {
>        export LD_FOR_TARGET="${TARGET_SYS}-ld"
>        export NM_FOR_TARGET="${TARGET_SYS}-nm"
>        export CC_FOR_TARGET="${CCACHE} ${TARGET_SYS}-gcc ${TARGET_CC_ARCH}"
> +       export OBJDUMP_FOR_TARGET="${TARGET_SYS}-objdump"
> +       export OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET="${TARGET_SYS}-objcopy"
> +       export STRIP_FOR_TARGET="${TARGET_SYS}-strip"
> +       # Make sure we use GMP/MPFR statically
> +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_GMPLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
> +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_GMPLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
> +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_PPLLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
> +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_PPLLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
> +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_LIBELFLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
> +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_LIBELFLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
>  }
>
>  LIBGCCS_VAR = "-lgcc_s"
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-sdk.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-sdk.inc
> index 756e74e..3eb8992 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-sdk.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-sdk.inc
> @@ -39,6 +39,14 @@ do_configure () {
>        export CPPFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_CPPFLAGS}"
>        export CXXFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_CXXFLAGS}"
>        export LDFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_LDFLAGS}"
> +       export CC_FOR_TARGET="${CCACHE} ${TARGET_SYS}-gcc ${TARGET_CC_ARCH}"
> +       # Make sure we use GMP/MPFR statically
> +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_GMPLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
> +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_GMPLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
> +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_PPLLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
> +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_PPLLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
> +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_LIBELFLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
> +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_LIBELFLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
>        (cd ${S} && gnu-configize) || die "failure running gnu-configize"
>        oe_runconf
>  }
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.3.3.bb
> index d420f80..8bf07d7 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.3.3.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.3.3.bb
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ require gcc-cross-canadian.inc
>  require gcc-configure-sdk.inc
>  require gcc-package-sdk.inc
>
> -PR = "r20"
> +PR = "r21"
>
>  DEPENDS += "gmp-nativesdk mpfr-nativesdk"
>  RDEPENDS_${PN} += "mpfr-nativesdk"
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.5.1.bb
> index 3eea4bc..92708d4 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.5.1.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.5.1.bb
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ require gcc-cross-canadian.inc
>  require gcc-configure-sdk.inc
>  require gcc-package-sdk.inc
>
> -PR = "r3"
> +PR = "r4"
>
>  DEPENDS += "gmp-nativesdk mpfr-nativesdk libmpc-nativesdk elfutils-nativesdk"
>  RDEPENDS_${PN} += "mpfr-nativesdk libmpc-nativesdk elfutils-nativesdk"
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.3.3.bb
> index 28ac1ab..ef52845 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.3.3.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.3.3.bb
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>  require gcc-cross_${PV}.bb
>  require gcc-cross-initial.inc
>
> -PR = "r5"
> +PR = "r6"
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.1.bb
> index b2c257d..38e0964 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.1.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.1.bb
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>  require gcc-cross_${PV}.bb
>  require gcc-cross-initial.inc
>
> -PR = "r2"
> +PR = "r3"
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
> index a8473b0..deeee37 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>  require gcc-cross_${PV}.bb
>  require gcc-cross-intermediate.inc
> -PR = "r5"
> +PR = "r6"
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
> index e65d5df..9a30cb5 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>  require gcc-cross_${PV}.bb
>  require gcc-cross-intermediate.inc
> -PR = "r3"
> +PR = "r4"
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-kernel-3.4.4_csl-arm-2005q3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-kernel-3.4.4_csl-arm-2005q3.bb
> index 88e3842..462104f 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-kernel-3.4.4_csl-arm-2005q3.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-kernel-3.4.4_csl-arm-2005q3.bb
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ require gcc-cross-kernel.inc
>
>  DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1"
>
> -PR = "r4"
> +PR = "r5"
>
>  SRC_URI += "file://gcc-3.4.4-makefile-fix.patch;patch=1"
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.3.3.bb
> index 5eaac5f..1a982f5 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.3.3.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.3.3.bb
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -PR = "r17"
> +PR = "r18"
>
>  require gcc-${PV}.inc
>  require gcc-cross4.inc
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.5.1.bb
> index 399cdf9..78bb05a 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.5.1.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.5.1.bb
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -PR = "r2"
> +PR = "r3"
>
>  require gcc-${PV}.inc
>  require gcc-cross4.inc
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_csl-arm-2008q1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
> index 89534f1..0e7a1ee 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -PR = "r5"
> +PR = "r6"
>
>  require gcc-csl-arm-2008q1.inc
>  require gcc-cross4.inc
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.3.3.bb
> index b42de47..d3ddcb1 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.3.3.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.3.3.bb
> @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
>  require gcc-cross-initial_${PV}.bb
>  require gcc-crosssdk-initial.inc
> -PR = "r6"
> +PR = "r7"
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.5.1.bb
> index 240caf5..fec53b9 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.5.1.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.5.1.bb
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>  require gcc-cross-initial_${PV}.bb
>  require gcc-crosssdk-initial.inc
>
> -PR = "r2"
> +PR = "r3"
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
> index cd1f966..2be05f1 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
> @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
>  require gcc-cross-intermediate_${PV}.bb
>  require gcc-crosssdk-intermediate.inc
> -PR = "r8"
> +PR = "r9"
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
> index a6653dd..161d870 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>  require gcc-cross-intermediate_${PV}.bb
>  require gcc-crosssdk-intermediate.inc
>
> -PR = "r2"
> +PR = "r3"
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk_4.5.1.bb
> index 129e8d3..7069088 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk_4.5.1.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk_4.5.1.bb
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>  require gcc-cross_${PV}.bb
>  require gcc-crosssdk.inc
>
> -PR = "r2"
> +PR = "r3"
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.3.3.bb
> index 99f927a..2f5cfb5 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.3.3.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.3.3.bb
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -PR = "r18"
> +PR = "r19"
>
>  require gcc-${PV}.inc
>  require gcc-configure-runtime.inc
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.5.1.bb
> index 093f9bf..c1e680d 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.5.1.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.5.1.bb
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -PR = "r2"
> +PR = "r3"
>
>  require gcc-${PV}.inc
>  require gcc-configure-runtime.inc
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.3.3.bb
> index f0471d4..ba6e7b2 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.3.3.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.3.3.bb
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -PR = "r11"
> +PR = "r12"
>
>  require gcc-${PV}.inc
>  require gcc-configure-target.inc
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.5.1.bb
> index 919d4b0..25e455c 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.5.1.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.5.1.bb
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -PR = "r2"
> +PR = "r3"
>  require gcc-${PV}.inc
>  require gcc-configure-target.inc
>  require gcc-package-target.inc
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_csl-arm-2008q1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
> index cc7540a..2df12ef 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -PR = "r3"
> +PR = "r4"
>
>  require gcc-${PV}.inc
>  require gcc-configure-target.inc
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_4.5.1.bb
> index b6cf268..3f7ce0a 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_4.5.1.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_4.5.1.bb
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  require gcc-${PV}.inc
>
> -PR = "r0"
> +PR = "r1"
>
>  INHIBIT_DEFAULT_DEPS = "1"
>  DEPENDS = "virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}g++"
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
>

Re: [PATCHv3 3/6] gcc: Statically link in support libraries e.g. libmpfr libgmp etc.

[Richard Purdie]

On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 22:38 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> ping any opinion on this patch ?

This change looks rather hacky and I'd really like to understand more
about why this is needed and whether there is a better way we could
ensure the right flags get passed around. Can you provide more details
about whats going on with this. Obviously this change as it stands isn't
acceptable to upstream gcc and I'd like to see if we could find one that
was.

Cheers,

Richard

> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> > * This is helpful to get consistent behaviour with gcc on different
> >  hosts and linking the libraries in for cross gcc recipes should not
> >  be increasing the binary size alarmingly
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc |    7 +++++++
> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc  |   10 ++++++++++
> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-sdk.inc    |    8 ++++++++
> >  .../gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.3.3.bb                |    2 +-
> >  .../gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.5.1.bb                |    2 +-
> >  .../gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.3.3.bb                 |    2 +-
> >  .../gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.1.bb                 |    2 +-
> >  .../gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.3.3.bb            |    2 +-
> >  .../gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.5.1.bb            |    2 +-
> >  .../gcc/gcc-cross-kernel-3.4.4_csl-arm-2005q3.bb   |    2 +-
> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.3.3.bb       |    2 +-
> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.5.1.bb       |    2 +-
> >  .../gcc/gcc-cross_csl-arm-2008q1.bb                |    2 +-
> >  .../gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.3.3.bb              |    2 +-
> >  .../gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.5.1.bb              |    2 +-
> >  .../gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.3.3.bb         |    2 +-
> >  .../gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.5.1.bb         |    2 +-
> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk_4.5.1.bb    |    2 +-
> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.3.3.bb     |    2 +-
> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.5.1.bb     |    2 +-
> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.3.3.bb             |    2 +-
> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.5.1.bb             |    2 +-
> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_csl-arm-2008q1.bb    |    2 +-
> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_4.5.1.bb          |    2 +-
> >  24 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc
> > index 4393777..cdb69fb 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc
> > @@ -85,6 +85,11 @@ do_configure () {
> >        export CXXFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_CXXFLAGS}"
> >        export LDFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_LDFLAGS}"
> >        export ARCH_FLAGS_FOR_TARGET="${ARCH_FLAGS_FOR_TARGET}"
> > +
> > +        # Make sure LDFLAGS are honored.
> > +        sed -i 's/^LDFLAGS = $/LDFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@/' ${S}/Makefile.in
> > +        sed -i 's/^LDFLAGS = $/LDFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
> > +
> >        (cd ${S} && gnu-configize) || die "failure running gnu-configize"
> >
> >        # teach gcc to find correct target includedir when checking libc ssp support
> > @@ -108,5 +113,7 @@ do_configure () {
> >        echo "#endif /* ! GCC_DEFAULTS_H */" >> ${S}/gcc/defaults.h.new
> >        mv ${S}/gcc/defaults.h.new ${S}/gcc/defaults.h
> >        oe_runconf
> > +        # make sure that no @LDFLAG@ is left in the generated Makefile
> > +        sed -i "s/@LDFLAGS@//g" ${B}/Makefile
> >  }
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc
> > index 346d164..200cbe2 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc
> > @@ -16,6 +16,16 @@ do_compile_prepend () {
> >        export LD_FOR_TARGET="${TARGET_SYS}-ld"
> >        export NM_FOR_TARGET="${TARGET_SYS}-nm"
> >        export CC_FOR_TARGET="${CCACHE} ${TARGET_SYS}-gcc ${TARGET_CC_ARCH}"
> > +       export OBJDUMP_FOR_TARGET="${TARGET_SYS}-objdump"
> > +       export OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET="${TARGET_SYS}-objcopy"
> > +       export STRIP_FOR_TARGET="${TARGET_SYS}-strip"
> > +       # Make sure we use GMP/MPFR statically
> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_GMPLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_GMPLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_PPLLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_PPLLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_LIBELFLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_LIBELFLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
> >  }
> >
> >  LIBGCCS_VAR = "-lgcc_s"
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-sdk.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-sdk.inc
> > index 756e74e..3eb8992 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-sdk.inc
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-sdk.inc
> > @@ -39,6 +39,14 @@ do_configure () {
> >        export CPPFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_CPPFLAGS}"
> >        export CXXFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_CXXFLAGS}"
> >        export LDFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_LDFLAGS}"
> > +       export CC_FOR_TARGET="${CCACHE} ${TARGET_SYS}-gcc ${TARGET_CC_ARCH}"
> > +       # Make sure we use GMP/MPFR statically
> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_GMPLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_GMPLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_PPLLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_PPLLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_LIBELFLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_LIBELFLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
> >        (cd ${S} && gnu-configize) || die "failure running gnu-configize"
> >        oe_runconf
> >  }
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.3.3.bb
> > index d420f80..8bf07d7 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.3.3.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.3.3.bb
> > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ require gcc-cross-canadian.inc
> >  require gcc-configure-sdk.inc
> >  require gcc-package-sdk.inc
> >
> > -PR = "r20"
> > +PR = "r21"
> >
> >  DEPENDS += "gmp-nativesdk mpfr-nativesdk"
> >  RDEPENDS_${PN} += "mpfr-nativesdk"
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.5.1.bb
> > index 3eea4bc..92708d4 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.5.1.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.5.1.bb
> > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ require gcc-cross-canadian.inc
> >  require gcc-configure-sdk.inc
> >  require gcc-package-sdk.inc
> >
> > -PR = "r3"
> > +PR = "r4"
> >
> >  DEPENDS += "gmp-nativesdk mpfr-nativesdk libmpc-nativesdk elfutils-nativesdk"
> >  RDEPENDS_${PN} += "mpfr-nativesdk libmpc-nativesdk elfutils-nativesdk"
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.3.3.bb
> > index 28ac1ab..ef52845 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.3.3.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.3.3.bb
> > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> >  require gcc-cross_${PV}.bb
> >  require gcc-cross-initial.inc
> >
> > -PR = "r5"
> > +PR = "r6"
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.1.bb
> > index b2c257d..38e0964 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.1.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.1.bb
> > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> >  require gcc-cross_${PV}.bb
> >  require gcc-cross-initial.inc
> >
> > -PR = "r2"
> > +PR = "r3"
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
> > index a8473b0..deeee37 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> >  require gcc-cross_${PV}.bb
> >  require gcc-cross-intermediate.inc
> > -PR = "r5"
> > +PR = "r6"
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
> > index e65d5df..9a30cb5 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> >  require gcc-cross_${PV}.bb
> >  require gcc-cross-intermediate.inc
> > -PR = "r3"
> > +PR = "r4"
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-kernel-3.4.4_csl-arm-2005q3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-kernel-3.4.4_csl-arm-2005q3.bb
> > index 88e3842..462104f 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-kernel-3.4.4_csl-arm-2005q3.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-kernel-3.4.4_csl-arm-2005q3.bb
> > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ require gcc-cross-kernel.inc
> >
> >  DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1"
> >
> > -PR = "r4"
> > +PR = "r5"
> >
> >  SRC_URI += "file://gcc-3.4.4-makefile-fix.patch;patch=1"
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.3.3.bb
> > index 5eaac5f..1a982f5 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.3.3.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.3.3.bb
> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > -PR = "r17"
> > +PR = "r18"
> >
> >  require gcc-${PV}.inc
> >  require gcc-cross4.inc
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.5.1.bb
> > index 399cdf9..78bb05a 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.5.1.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.5.1.bb
> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > -PR = "r2"
> > +PR = "r3"
> >
> >  require gcc-${PV}.inc
> >  require gcc-cross4.inc
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_csl-arm-2008q1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
> > index 89534f1..0e7a1ee 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > -PR = "r5"
> > +PR = "r6"
> >
> >  require gcc-csl-arm-2008q1.inc
> >  require gcc-cross4.inc
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.3.3.bb
> > index b42de47..d3ddcb1 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.3.3.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.3.3.bb
> > @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
> >  require gcc-cross-initial_${PV}.bb
> >  require gcc-crosssdk-initial.inc
> > -PR = "r6"
> > +PR = "r7"
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.5.1.bb
> > index 240caf5..fec53b9 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.5.1.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.5.1.bb
> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> >  require gcc-cross-initial_${PV}.bb
> >  require gcc-crosssdk-initial.inc
> >
> > -PR = "r2"
> > +PR = "r3"
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
> > index cd1f966..2be05f1 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
> > @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
> >  require gcc-cross-intermediate_${PV}.bb
> >  require gcc-crosssdk-intermediate.inc
> > -PR = "r8"
> > +PR = "r9"
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
> > index a6653dd..161d870 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> >  require gcc-cross-intermediate_${PV}.bb
> >  require gcc-crosssdk-intermediate.inc
> >
> > -PR = "r2"
> > +PR = "r3"
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk_4.5.1.bb
> > index 129e8d3..7069088 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk_4.5.1.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk_4.5.1.bb
> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> >  require gcc-cross_${PV}.bb
> >  require gcc-crosssdk.inc
> >
> > -PR = "r2"
> > +PR = "r3"
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.3.3.bb
> > index 99f927a..2f5cfb5 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.3.3.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.3.3.bb
> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > -PR = "r18"
> > +PR = "r19"
> >
> >  require gcc-${PV}.inc
> >  require gcc-configure-runtime.inc
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.5.1.bb
> > index 093f9bf..c1e680d 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.5.1.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.5.1.bb
> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > -PR = "r2"
> > +PR = "r3"
> >
> >  require gcc-${PV}.inc
> >  require gcc-configure-runtime.inc
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.3.3.bb
> > index f0471d4..ba6e7b2 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.3.3.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.3.3.bb
> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > -PR = "r11"
> > +PR = "r12"
> >
> >  require gcc-${PV}.inc
> >  require gcc-configure-target.inc
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.5.1.bb
> > index 919d4b0..25e455c 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.5.1.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.5.1.bb
> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > -PR = "r2"
> > +PR = "r3"
> >  require gcc-${PV}.inc
> >  require gcc-configure-target.inc
> >  require gcc-package-target.inc
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_csl-arm-2008q1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
> > index cc7540a..2df12ef 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > -PR = "r3"
> > +PR = "r4"
> >
> >  require gcc-${PV}.inc
> >  require gcc-configure-target.inc
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_4.5.1.bb
> > index b6cf268..3f7ce0a 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_4.5.1.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_4.5.1.bb
> > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> >  require gcc-${PV}.inc
> >
> > -PR = "r0"
> > +PR = "r1"
> >
> >  INHIBIT_DEFAULT_DEPS = "1"
> >  DEPENDS = "virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}g++"
> > --
> > 1.7.4.1
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> 

Re: [PATCHv3 3/6] gcc: Statically link in support libraries e.g. libmpfr libgmp etc.

[Khem Raj]

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Richard Purdie
<richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 22:38 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
>> ping any opinion on this patch ?
>
> This change looks rather hacky and I'd really like to understand more
> about why this is needed and whether there is a better way we could
> ensure the right flags get passed around. Can you provide more details
> about whats going on with this. Obviously this change as it stands isn't
> acceptable to upstream gcc and I'd like to see if we could find one that
> was.

this is because the supporting libraries like mpc mpfr that are needed
by gcc itself to run
we might have different versions of these libraries. So depending upon
shared objects
would mean we need to find same shared objects where say the SDK is installed
so either we ship the whole baggage or we link it in statically. This
patch makes those libs to
linked in statically and cross gcc wont have dependencies on these
libs anymore so
it can run on all hosts pretty much.

Another different way to do it would be to build these libraries as
part of gcc-cross build in unified tree
and then gcc would automatically link in the static versions of these
libraries. As a downside
if the native versions of these libraries are needed elesewhere then
we will build that lib twice.
But it should be cleaner IMO to just build them intree with gcc.

>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > * This is helpful to get consistent behaviour with gcc on different
>> >  hosts and linking the libraries in for cross gcc recipes should not
>> >  be increasing the binary size alarmingly
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
>> > ---
>> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc |    7 +++++++
>> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc  |   10 ++++++++++
>> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-sdk.inc    |    8 ++++++++
>> >  .../gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.3.3.bb                |    2 +-
>> >  .../gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.5.1.bb                |    2 +-
>> >  .../gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.3.3.bb                 |    2 +-
>> >  .../gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.1.bb                 |    2 +-
>> >  .../gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.3.3.bb            |    2 +-
>> >  .../gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.5.1.bb            |    2 +-
>> >  .../gcc/gcc-cross-kernel-3.4.4_csl-arm-2005q3.bb   |    2 +-
>> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.3.3.bb       |    2 +-
>> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.5.1.bb       |    2 +-
>> >  .../gcc/gcc-cross_csl-arm-2008q1.bb                |    2 +-
>> >  .../gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.3.3.bb              |    2 +-
>> >  .../gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.5.1.bb              |    2 +-
>> >  .../gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.3.3.bb         |    2 +-
>> >  .../gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.5.1.bb         |    2 +-
>> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk_4.5.1.bb    |    2 +-
>> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.3.3.bb     |    2 +-
>> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.5.1.bb     |    2 +-
>> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.3.3.bb             |    2 +-
>> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.5.1.bb             |    2 +-
>> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_csl-arm-2008q1.bb    |    2 +-
>> >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_4.5.1.bb          |    2 +-
>> >  24 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc
>> > index 4393777..cdb69fb 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc
>> > @@ -85,6 +85,11 @@ do_configure () {
>> >        export CXXFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_CXXFLAGS}"
>> >        export LDFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_LDFLAGS}"
>> >        export ARCH_FLAGS_FOR_TARGET="${ARCH_FLAGS_FOR_TARGET}"
>> > +
>> > +        # Make sure LDFLAGS are honored.
>> > +        sed -i 's/^LDFLAGS = $/LDFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@/' ${S}/Makefile.in
>> > +        sed -i 's/^LDFLAGS = $/LDFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
>> > +
>> >        (cd ${S} && gnu-configize) || die "failure running gnu-configize"
>> >
>> >        # teach gcc to find correct target includedir when checking libc ssp support
>> > @@ -108,5 +113,7 @@ do_configure () {
>> >        echo "#endif /* ! GCC_DEFAULTS_H */" >> ${S}/gcc/defaults.h.new
>> >        mv ${S}/gcc/defaults.h.new ${S}/gcc/defaults.h
>> >        oe_runconf
>> > +        # make sure that no @LDFLAG@ is left in the generated Makefile
>> > +        sed -i "s/@LDFLAGS@//g" ${B}/Makefile
>> >  }
>> >
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc
>> > index 346d164..200cbe2 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc
>> > @@ -16,6 +16,16 @@ do_compile_prepend () {
>> >        export LD_FOR_TARGET="${TARGET_SYS}-ld"
>> >        export NM_FOR_TARGET="${TARGET_SYS}-nm"
>> >        export CC_FOR_TARGET="${CCACHE} ${TARGET_SYS}-gcc ${TARGET_CC_ARCH}"
>> > +       export OBJDUMP_FOR_TARGET="${TARGET_SYS}-objdump"
>> > +       export OBJCOPY_FOR_TARGET="${TARGET_SYS}-objcopy"
>> > +       export STRIP_FOR_TARGET="${TARGET_SYS}-strip"
>> > +       # Make sure we use GMP/MPFR statically
>> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_GMPLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
>> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_GMPLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
>> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_PPLLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
>> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_PPLLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
>> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_LIBELFLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
>> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_LIBELFLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
>> >  }
>> >
>> >  LIBGCCS_VAR = "-lgcc_s"
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-sdk.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-sdk.inc
>> > index 756e74e..3eb8992 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-sdk.inc
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-sdk.inc
>> > @@ -39,6 +39,14 @@ do_configure () {
>> >        export CPPFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_CPPFLAGS}"
>> >        export CXXFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_CXXFLAGS}"
>> >        export LDFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="${BUILD_LDFLAGS}"
>> > +       export CC_FOR_TARGET="${CCACHE} ${TARGET_SYS}-gcc ${TARGET_CC_ARCH}"
>> > +       # Make sure we use GMP/MPFR statically
>> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_GMPLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
>> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_GMPLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
>> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_PPLLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
>> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_PPLLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
>> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_LIBELFLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.tpl
>> > +       sed -i 's/^\(HOST_LIBELFLIBS =\) \(.*\)$/\1 -Wl,-Bstatic \2 -Wl,-Bdynamic/' ${S}/Makefile.in
>> >        (cd ${S} && gnu-configize) || die "failure running gnu-configize"
>> >        oe_runconf
>> >  }
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.3.3.bb
>> > index d420f80..8bf07d7 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.3.3.bb
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.3.3.bb
>> > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ require gcc-cross-canadian.inc
>> >  require gcc-configure-sdk.inc
>> >  require gcc-package-sdk.inc
>> >
>> > -PR = "r20"
>> > +PR = "r21"
>> >
>> >  DEPENDS += "gmp-nativesdk mpfr-nativesdk"
>> >  RDEPENDS_${PN} += "mpfr-nativesdk"
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.5.1.bb
>> > index 3eea4bc..92708d4 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.5.1.bb
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-canadian_4.5.1.bb
>> > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ require gcc-cross-canadian.inc
>> >  require gcc-configure-sdk.inc
>> >  require gcc-package-sdk.inc
>> >
>> > -PR = "r3"
>> > +PR = "r4"
>> >
>> >  DEPENDS += "gmp-nativesdk mpfr-nativesdk libmpc-nativesdk elfutils-nativesdk"
>> >  RDEPENDS_${PN} += "mpfr-nativesdk libmpc-nativesdk elfutils-nativesdk"
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.3.3.bb
>> > index 28ac1ab..ef52845 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.3.3.bb
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.3.3.bb
>> > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>> >  require gcc-cross_${PV}.bb
>> >  require gcc-cross-initial.inc
>> >
>> > -PR = "r5"
>> > +PR = "r6"
>> >
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.1.bb
>> > index b2c257d..38e0964 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.1.bb
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.1.bb
>> > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>> >  require gcc-cross_${PV}.bb
>> >  require gcc-cross-initial.inc
>> >
>> > -PR = "r2"
>> > +PR = "r3"
>> >
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
>> > index a8473b0..deeee37 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
>> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> >  require gcc-cross_${PV}.bb
>> >  require gcc-cross-intermediate.inc
>> > -PR = "r5"
>> > +PR = "r6"
>> >
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
>> > index e65d5df..9a30cb5 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
>> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> >  require gcc-cross_${PV}.bb
>> >  require gcc-cross-intermediate.inc
>> > -PR = "r3"
>> > +PR = "r4"
>> >
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-kernel-3.4.4_csl-arm-2005q3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-kernel-3.4.4_csl-arm-2005q3.bb
>> > index 88e3842..462104f 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-kernel-3.4.4_csl-arm-2005q3.bb
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-kernel-3.4.4_csl-arm-2005q3.bb
>> > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ require gcc-cross-kernel.inc
>> >
>> >  DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1"
>> >
>> > -PR = "r4"
>> > +PR = "r5"
>> >
>> >  SRC_URI += "file://gcc-3.4.4-makefile-fix.patch;patch=1"
>> >
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.3.3.bb
>> > index 5eaac5f..1a982f5 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.3.3.bb
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.3.3.bb
>> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> > -PR = "r17"
>> > +PR = "r18"
>> >
>> >  require gcc-${PV}.inc
>> >  require gcc-cross4.inc
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.5.1.bb
>> > index 399cdf9..78bb05a 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.5.1.bb
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.5.1.bb
>> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> > -PR = "r2"
>> > +PR = "r3"
>> >
>> >  require gcc-${PV}.inc
>> >  require gcc-cross4.inc
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_csl-arm-2008q1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
>> > index 89534f1..0e7a1ee 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
>> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> > -PR = "r5"
>> > +PR = "r6"
>> >
>> >  require gcc-csl-arm-2008q1.inc
>> >  require gcc-cross4.inc
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.3.3.bb
>> > index b42de47..d3ddcb1 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.3.3.bb
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.3.3.bb
>> > @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
>> >  require gcc-cross-initial_${PV}.bb
>> >  require gcc-crosssdk-initial.inc
>> > -PR = "r6"
>> > +PR = "r7"
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.5.1.bb
>> > index 240caf5..fec53b9 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.5.1.bb
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-initial_4.5.1.bb
>> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> >  require gcc-cross-initial_${PV}.bb
>> >  require gcc-crosssdk-initial.inc
>> >
>> > -PR = "r2"
>> > +PR = "r3"
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
>> > index cd1f966..2be05f1 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.3.3.bb
>> > @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
>> >  require gcc-cross-intermediate_${PV}.bb
>> >  require gcc-crosssdk-intermediate.inc
>> > -PR = "r8"
>> > +PR = "r9"
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
>> > index a6653dd..161d870 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk-intermediate_4.5.1.bb
>> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> >  require gcc-cross-intermediate_${PV}.bb
>> >  require gcc-crosssdk-intermediate.inc
>> >
>> > -PR = "r2"
>> > +PR = "r3"
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk_4.5.1.bb
>> > index 129e8d3..7069088 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk_4.5.1.bb
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk_4.5.1.bb
>> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> >  require gcc-cross_${PV}.bb
>> >  require gcc-crosssdk.inc
>> >
>> > -PR = "r2"
>> > +PR = "r3"
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.3.3.bb
>> > index 99f927a..2f5cfb5 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.3.3.bb
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.3.3.bb
>> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> > -PR = "r18"
>> > +PR = "r19"
>> >
>> >  require gcc-${PV}.inc
>> >  require gcc-configure-runtime.inc
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.5.1.bb
>> > index 093f9bf..c1e680d 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.5.1.bb
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime_4.5.1.bb
>> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> > -PR = "r2"
>> > +PR = "r3"
>> >
>> >  require gcc-${PV}.inc
>> >  require gcc-configure-runtime.inc
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.3.3.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.3.3.bb
>> > index f0471d4..ba6e7b2 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.3.3.bb
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.3.3.bb
>> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> > -PR = "r11"
>> > +PR = "r12"
>> >
>> >  require gcc-${PV}.inc
>> >  require gcc-configure-target.inc
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.5.1.bb
>> > index 919d4b0..25e455c 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.5.1.bb
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_4.5.1.bb
>> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> > -PR = "r2"
>> > +PR = "r3"
>> >  require gcc-${PV}.inc
>> >  require gcc-configure-target.inc
>> >  require gcc-package-target.inc
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_csl-arm-2008q1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
>> > index cc7540a..2df12ef 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc_csl-arm-2008q1.bb
>> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> > -PR = "r3"
>> > +PR = "r4"
>> >
>> >  require gcc-${PV}.inc
>> >  require gcc-configure-target.inc
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_4.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_4.5.1.bb
>> > index b6cf268..3f7ce0a 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_4.5.1.bb
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc_4.5.1.bb
>> > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>> >  require gcc-${PV}.inc
>> >
>> > -PR = "r0"
>> > +PR = "r1"
>> >
>> >  INHIBIT_DEFAULT_DEPS = "1"
>> >  DEPENDS = "virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}g++"
>> > --
>> > 1.7.4.1
>> >
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>

Re: [PATCHv3 3/6] gcc: Statically link in support libraries e.g. libmpfr libgmp etc.

[Richard Purdie]

On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 11:04 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Richard Purdie
> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 22:38 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> >> ping any opinion on this patch ?
> >
> > This change looks rather hacky and I'd really like to understand more
> > about why this is needed and whether there is a better way we could
> > ensure the right flags get passed around. Can you provide more details
> > about whats going on with this. Obviously this change as it stands isn't
> > acceptable to upstream gcc and I'd like to see if we could find one that
> > was.
> 
> this is because the supporting libraries like mpc mpfr that are needed
> by gcc itself to run
> we might have different versions of these libraries. So depending upon
> shared objects
> would mean we need to find same shared objects where say the SDK is installed
> so either we ship the whole baggage or we link it in statically. This
> patch makes those libs to
> linked in statically and cross gcc wont have dependencies on these
> libs anymore so
> it can run on all hosts pretty much.

If you look at the way the SDK toolchain works in Poky, it automatically
ships the versions of these libraries that it needs so we don't actually
have this problem.

Also, looking at the patch again, was the first LDFLAGS change meant to
be in there, is that related or different to the shared/static
mpfr/mpc/gmp issue?

Cheers,

Richard

Re: [PATCHv3 3/6] gcc: Statically link in support libraries e.g. libmpfr libgmp etc.

[Tom Rini]

On 03/12/2011 05:50 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 11:04 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Richard Purdie
>> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>  wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 22:38 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>> ping any opinion on this patch ?
>>>
>>> This change looks rather hacky and I'd really like to understand more
>>> about why this is needed and whether there is a better way we could
>>> ensure the right flags get passed around. Can you provide more details
>>> about whats going on with this. Obviously this change as it stands isn't
>>> acceptable to upstream gcc and I'd like to see if we could find one that
>>> was.
>>
>> this is because the supporting libraries like mpc mpfr that are needed
>> by gcc itself to run
>> we might have different versions of these libraries. So depending upon
>> shared objects
>> would mean we need to find same shared objects where say the SDK is installed
>> so either we ship the whole baggage or we link it in statically. This
>> patch makes those libs to
>> linked in statically and cross gcc wont have dependencies on these
>> libs anymore so
>> it can run on all hosts pretty much.
>
> If you look at the way the SDK toolchain works in Poky, it automatically
> ships the versions of these libraries that it needs so we don't actually
> have this problem.
>
> Also, looking at the patch again, was the first LDFLAGS change meant to
> be in there, is that related or different to the shared/static
> mpfr/mpc/gmp issue?

I think it's time for someone to build one at dig at it, but are you 
sure they're used and shipped and not just used?  That was a problem 
before and unless the exported bits are using a relative $ORIGIN in the 
link path (or we've broken relocatability, which would be another 
problem) there's problems today.

-- 
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation

Re: [PATCHv3 3/6] gcc: Statically link in support libraries e.g. libmpfr libgmp etc.

[Richard Purdie]

On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 09:50 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 03/12/2011 05:50 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 11:04 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Richard Purdie
> >> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>  wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 22:38 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> >>>> ping any opinion on this patch ?
> >>>
> >>> This change looks rather hacky and I'd really like to understand more
> >>> about why this is needed and whether there is a better way we could
> >>> ensure the right flags get passed around. Can you provide more details
> >>> about whats going on with this. Obviously this change as it stands isn't
> >>> acceptable to upstream gcc and I'd like to see if we could find one that
> >>> was.
> >>
> >> this is because the supporting libraries like mpc mpfr that are needed
> >> by gcc itself to run
> >> we might have different versions of these libraries. So depending upon
> >> shared objects
> >> would mean we need to find same shared objects where say the SDK is installed
> >> so either we ship the whole baggage or we link it in statically. This
> >> patch makes those libs to
> >> linked in statically and cross gcc wont have dependencies on these
> >> libs anymore so
> >> it can run on all hosts pretty much.
> >
> > If you look at the way the SDK toolchain works in Poky, it automatically
> > ships the versions of these libraries that it needs so we don't actually
> > have this problem.
> >
> > Also, looking at the patch again, was the first LDFLAGS change meant to
> > be in there, is that related or different to the shared/static
> > mpfr/mpc/gmp issue?
> 
> I think it's time for someone to build one at dig at it, but are you 
> sure they're used and shipped and not just used?  That was a problem 
> before and unless the exported bits are using a relative $ORIGIN in the 
> link path (or we've broken relocatability, which would be another 
> problem) there's problems today.

They are used and shipped. As evidence I submit:

http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/nightly/20110311-1/toolchain/x86_64/poky-lsb-eglibc-x86_64-i586-toolchain-gmae-0.9+snapshot-20110313.tar.bz2

which I just inspected and it contains libmpc, libgmp and libmpfr.

If it doesn't work, I'd like someone to demonstrate the bug :)

Jsut to be clear, there is *one* hardcoded assumption in the way
nativesdk works which is to do with the dynamic loader location. If we
can link things against some generic common denominator ld.so (likely
from LSB?), it should be possible to remove that limitation. Its always
been intended to add that, just nobody has done it yet. 

Cheers,

Richard

Re: [PATCHv3 3/6] gcc: Statically link in support libraries e.g. libmpfr libgmp etc.

[Tom Rini]

On 03/14/2011 12:54 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 09:50 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On 03/12/2011 05:50 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 11:04 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Richard Purdie
>>>> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>   wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 22:38 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>>>> ping any opinion on this patch ?
>>>>>
>>>>> This change looks rather hacky and I'd really like to understand more
>>>>> about why this is needed and whether there is a better way we could
>>>>> ensure the right flags get passed around. Can you provide more details
>>>>> about whats going on with this. Obviously this change as it stands isn't
>>>>> acceptable to upstream gcc and I'd like to see if we could find one that
>>>>> was.
>>>>
>>>> this is because the supporting libraries like mpc mpfr that are needed
>>>> by gcc itself to run
>>>> we might have different versions of these libraries. So depending upon
>>>> shared objects
>>>> would mean we need to find same shared objects where say the SDK is installed
>>>> so either we ship the whole baggage or we link it in statically. This
>>>> patch makes those libs to
>>>> linked in statically and cross gcc wont have dependencies on these
>>>> libs anymore so
>>>> it can run on all hosts pretty much.
>>>
>>> If you look at the way the SDK toolchain works in Poky, it automatically
>>> ships the versions of these libraries that it needs so we don't actually
>>> have this problem.
>>>
>>> Also, looking at the patch again, was the first LDFLAGS change meant to
>>> be in there, is that related or different to the shared/static
>>> mpfr/mpc/gmp issue?
>>
>> I think it's time for someone to build one at dig at it, but are you
>> sure they're used and shipped and not just used?  That was a problem
>> before and unless the exported bits are using a relative $ORIGIN in the
>> link path (or we've broken relocatability, which would be another
>> problem) there's problems today.
>
> They are used and shipped. As evidence I submit:
>
> http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/nightly/20110311-1/toolchain/x86_64/poky-lsb-eglibc-x86_64-i586-toolchain-gmae-0.9+snapshot-20110313.tar.bz2

Is 
/opt/poky-lsb/0.9+snapshot/sysroots/x86_64-pokysdk-linux/usr/bin/i586-poky-linux/i586-poky-linux-gcc 
the runs on host targets the target cross compiler the user should use 
now?  If so, you don't have relocation as the RPATH is hard-coded not 
$ORIGIN based.  If not, can I have a pointer to the right gcc to poke 
at?  Thanks :)

-- 
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation

Re: [PATCHv3 3/6] gcc: Statically link in support libraries e.g. libmpfr libgmp etc.

[Richard Purdie]

On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 10:33 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 03/14/2011 12:54 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 09:50 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> On 03/12/2011 05:50 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 11:04 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Richard Purdie
> >>>> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>   wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 22:38 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> >>>>>> ping any opinion on this patch ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This change looks rather hacky and I'd really like to understand more
> >>>>> about why this is needed and whether there is a better way we could
> >>>>> ensure the right flags get passed around. Can you provide more details
> >>>>> about whats going on with this. Obviously this change as it stands isn't
> >>>>> acceptable to upstream gcc and I'd like to see if we could find one that
> >>>>> was.
> >>>>
> >>>> this is because the supporting libraries like mpc mpfr that are needed
> >>>> by gcc itself to run
> >>>> we might have different versions of these libraries. So depending upon
> >>>> shared objects
> >>>> would mean we need to find same shared objects where say the SDK is installed
> >>>> so either we ship the whole baggage or we link it in statically. This
> >>>> patch makes those libs to
> >>>> linked in statically and cross gcc wont have dependencies on these
> >>>> libs anymore so
> >>>> it can run on all hosts pretty much.
> >>>
> >>> If you look at the way the SDK toolchain works in Poky, it automatically
> >>> ships the versions of these libraries that it needs so we don't actually
> >>> have this problem.
> >>>
> >>> Also, looking at the patch again, was the first LDFLAGS change meant to
> >>> be in there, is that related or different to the shared/static
> >>> mpfr/mpc/gmp issue?
> >>
> >> I think it's time for someone to build one at dig at it, but are you
> >> sure they're used and shipped and not just used?  That was a problem
> >> before and unless the exported bits are using a relative $ORIGIN in the
> >> link path (or we've broken relocatability, which would be another
> >> problem) there's problems today.
> >
> > They are used and shipped. As evidence I submit:
> >
> > http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/nightly/20110311-1/toolchain/x86_64/poky-lsb-eglibc-x86_64-i586-toolchain-gmae-0.9+snapshot-20110313.tar.bz2
> 
> Is 
> /opt/poky-lsb/0.9+snapshot/sysroots/x86_64-pokysdk-linux/usr/bin/i586-poky-linux/i586-poky-linux-gcc 
> the runs on host targets the target cross compiler the user should use 
> now?  If so, you don't have relocation as the RPATH is hard-coded not 
> $ORIGIN based.  If not, can I have a pointer to the right gcc to poke 
> at?  Thanks :)

Hmm, this sounds like something is not working with the relocation. I
could have sworn we'd made that relocatable :/.

It shouldn't be hard to fix with the relocation class at least...

I hope we at least agree it does find the right libraries to link
against which is most of the problem solved :)

Cheers,

Richard

Re: [PATCHv3 3/6] gcc: Statically link in support libraries e.g. libmpfr libgmp etc.

[Tom Rini]

On 03/16/2011 06:27 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 10:33 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On 03/14/2011 12:54 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 09:50 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>> On 03/12/2011 05:50 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 11:04 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Richard Purdie
>>>>>> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>    wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 22:38 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>>>>>> ping any opinion on this patch ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This change looks rather hacky and I'd really like to understand more
>>>>>>> about why this is needed and whether there is a better way we could
>>>>>>> ensure the right flags get passed around. Can you provide more details
>>>>>>> about whats going on with this. Obviously this change as it stands isn't
>>>>>>> acceptable to upstream gcc and I'd like to see if we could find one that
>>>>>>> was.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> this is because the supporting libraries like mpc mpfr that are needed
>>>>>> by gcc itself to run
>>>>>> we might have different versions of these libraries. So depending upon
>>>>>> shared objects
>>>>>> would mean we need to find same shared objects where say the SDK is installed
>>>>>> so either we ship the whole baggage or we link it in statically. This
>>>>>> patch makes those libs to
>>>>>> linked in statically and cross gcc wont have dependencies on these
>>>>>> libs anymore so
>>>>>> it can run on all hosts pretty much.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you look at the way the SDK toolchain works in Poky, it automatically
>>>>> ships the versions of these libraries that it needs so we don't actually
>>>>> have this problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, looking at the patch again, was the first LDFLAGS change meant to
>>>>> be in there, is that related or different to the shared/static
>>>>> mpfr/mpc/gmp issue?
>>>>
>>>> I think it's time for someone to build one at dig at it, but are you
>>>> sure they're used and shipped and not just used?  That was a problem
>>>> before and unless the exported bits are using a relative $ORIGIN in the
>>>> link path (or we've broken relocatability, which would be another
>>>> problem) there's problems today.
>>>
>>> They are used and shipped. As evidence I submit:
>>>
>>> http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/nightly/20110311-1/toolchain/x86_64/poky-lsb-eglibc-x86_64-i586-toolchain-gmae-0.9+snapshot-20110313.tar.bz2
>>
>> Is
>> /opt/poky-lsb/0.9+snapshot/sysroots/x86_64-pokysdk-linux/usr/bin/i586-poky-linux/i586-poky-linux-gcc
>> the runs on host targets the target cross compiler the user should use
>> now?  If so, you don't have relocation as the RPATH is hard-coded not
>> $ORIGIN based.  If not, can I have a pointer to the right gcc to poke
>> at?  Thanks :)
>
> Hmm, this sounds like something is not working with the relocation. I
> could have sworn we'd made that relocatable :/.
>
> It shouldn't be hard to fix with the relocation class at least...

Yes, hopefully we just need to add relocatable to the various new 
classes and that'll be that.

-- 
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation

Re: [PATCHv3 3/6] gcc: Statically link in support libraries e.g. libmpfr libgmp etc.

[Khem Raj]

On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:50 AM, Richard Purdie
<richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 11:04 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Richard Purdie
>> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 22:38 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
>> >> ping any opinion on this patch ?
>> >
>> > This change looks rather hacky and I'd really like to understand more
>> > about why this is needed and whether there is a better way we could
>> > ensure the right flags get passed around. Can you provide more details
>> > about whats going on with this. Obviously this change as it stands isn't
>> > acceptable to upstream gcc and I'd like to see if we could find one that
>> > was.
>>
>> this is because the supporting libraries like mpc mpfr that are needed
>> by gcc itself to run
>> we might have different versions of these libraries. So depending upon
>> shared objects
>> would mean we need to find same shared objects where say the SDK is installed
>> so either we ship the whole baggage or we link it in statically. This
>> patch makes those libs to
>> linked in statically and cross gcc wont have dependencies on these
>> libs anymore so
>> it can run on all hosts pretty much.
>
> If you look at the way the SDK toolchain works in Poky, it automatically
> ships the versions of these libraries that it needs so we don't actually
> have this problem.
>

Yes thats one way of doing it and if you got it working this is fine
but there were issues when referencing
due to ORIGIN mucking. So this was better and cleaner than we link in
this libs into binary itself.  From
my POV even this solution can be improved by adding the support libs
to gcc build itself as sources
then we dont need to muck with gcc build configury at all. I have been
doing that for non OE related
SDKs and has been best so far.

> Also, looking at the patch again, was the first LDFLAGS change meant to
> be in there, is that related or different to the shared/static
> mpfr/mpc/gmp issue?

LDFLAGS are modified to get the LDFLAGS into gcc itself otherwise it
would not honour
the modified LDFLAGS to pass -static option.

>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>

Re: [PATCHv3 3/6] gcc: Statically link in support libraries e.g. libmpfr libgmp etc.

[Richard Purdie]

On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 10:52 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:50 AM, Richard Purdie
> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > If you look at the way the SDK toolchain works in Poky, it automatically
> > ships the versions of these libraries that it needs so we don't actually
> > have this problem.
> >
> 
> Yes thats one way of doing it and if you got it working this is fine
> but there were issues when referencing
> due to ORIGIN mucking. So this was better and cleaner than we link in
> this libs into binary itself.

The $ORIGIN stuff should be working just fine, have you checked this?

>   From
> my POV even this solution can be improved by adding the support libs
> to gcc build itself as sources
> then we dont need to muck with gcc build configury at all. I have been
> doing that for non OE related
> SDKs and has been best so far.

As I mention above, I do think we have a solution for this which is
working...

> > Also, looking at the patch again, was the first LDFLAGS change meant to
> > be in there, is that related or different to the shared/static
> > mpfr/mpc/gmp issue?
> 
> LDFLAGS are modified to get the LDFLAGS into gcc itself otherwise it
> would not honour
> the modified LDFLAGS to pass -static option.

Hmm, I'll look at the patch again as that didn't seem to be the only
LDFLAGS change but I could be wrong.

Cheers,

Richard

Re: [PATCHv3 3/6] gcc: Statically link in support libraries e.g. libmpfr libgmp etc.

[Khem Raj]

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Richard Purdie
<richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 10:52 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:50 AM, Richard Purdie
>> <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > If you look at the way the SDK toolchain works in Poky, it automatically
>> > ships the versions of these libraries that it needs so we don't actually
>> > have this problem.
>> >
>>
>> Yes thats one way of doing it and if you got it working this is fine
>> but there were issues when referencing
>> due to ORIGIN mucking. So this was better and cleaner than we link in
>> this libs into binary itself.
>
> The $ORIGIN stuff should be working just fine, have you checked this?
>
>>   From
>> my POV even this solution can be improved by adding the support libs
>> to gcc build itself as sources
>> then we dont need to muck with gcc build configury at all. I have been
>> doing that for non OE related
>> SDKs and has been best so far.
>
> As I mention above, I do think we have a solution for this which is
> working...


OK I think then I should withdraw this patch.

[PATCHv3 4/6] sanity.bbclass: Check for /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr to be >= 65536

[Khem Raj]

* Now qemu can handle lower values we can chnage this sanity test
  to check of values if less than 65536

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
---
 meta/classes/sanity.bbclass |   10 ++++++----
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass b/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass
index 13940f8..aae5028 100644
--- a/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass
@@ -170,10 +170,12 @@ def check_sanity(e):
         # This path is no longer user-readable in modern (very recent) Linux
         try:
             if os.path.exists("/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr"):
-                f = file("/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr", "r")
-                if (f.read().strip() != "0"):
-                        messages = messages + "/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr is not 0. This will cause problems with qemu so please fix the value (as root).\n\nTo fix this in later reboots, set vm.mmap_min_addr = 0 in /etc/sysctl.conf.\n"
-                f.close()
+                f = open("/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr", "r")
+                try:
+                    if (int(f.read().strip()) < 65536):
+                        messages = messages + "/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr is not >= 65536. This will cause problems with qemu so please fix the value (as root).\n\nTo fix this in later reboots, set vm.mmap_min_addr = 65536 in /etc/sysctl.conf.\n"
+                finally:
+                    f.close()
         except:
             pass
 
-- 
1.7.4.1

Re: [PATCHv3 4/6] sanity.bbclass: Check for /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr to be >= 65536

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2296 bytes --]

On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 10:52:45PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> * Now qemu can handle lower values we can chnage this sanity test
>   to check of values if less than 65536
> 
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
> ---
>  meta/classes/sanity.bbclass |   10 ++++++----
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass b/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass
> index 13940f8..aae5028 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass
> @@ -170,10 +170,12 @@ def check_sanity(e):
>          # This path is no longer user-readable in modern (very recent) Linux
>          try:
>              if os.path.exists("/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr"):
> -                f = file("/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr", "r")
> -                if (f.read().strip() != "0"):
> -                        messages = messages + "/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr is not 0. This will cause problems with qemu so please fix the value (as root).\n\nTo fix this in later reboots, set vm.mmap_min_addr = 0 in /etc/sysctl.conf.\n"
> -                f.close()
> +                f = open("/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr", "r")
> +                try:
> +                    if (int(f.read().strip()) < 65536):
> +                        messages = messages + "/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr is not >= 65536. This will cause problems with qemu so please fix the value (as root).\n\nTo fix this in later reboots, set vm.mmap_min_addr = 65536 in /etc/sysctl.conf.\n"
> +                finally:
> +                    f.close()
>          except:
>              pass
>  

corner cases when it cannot be read are with kernel between

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=0e1a6ef2dea88101b056b6d9984f3325c5efced3
2.6.33-rc2-0e1a6ef2dea88101b056b6d9984f3325c5efced3

and

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=822cceec7248013821d655545ea45d1c6a9d15b3
2.6.34-rc3-822cceec7248013821d655545ea45d1c6a9d15b3

see:
http://www.mail-archive.com/openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org/msg02340.html

Don't know if any large distribution is using 2.6.34 without that 2nd
patch backported.

Regards,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

Re: [PATCHv3 4/6] sanity.bbclass: Check for /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr to be >= 65536

[Richard Purdie]

On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 08:15 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 10:52:45PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> > * Now qemu can handle lower values we can chnage this sanity test
> >   to check of values if less than 65536
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  meta/classes/sanity.bbclass |   10 ++++++----
> >  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass b/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass
> > index 13940f8..aae5028 100644
> > --- a/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass
> > +++ b/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass
> > @@ -170,10 +170,12 @@ def check_sanity(e):
> >          # This path is no longer user-readable in modern (very recent) Linux
> >          try:
> >              if os.path.exists("/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr"):
> > -                f = file("/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr", "r")
> > -                if (f.read().strip() != "0"):
> > -                        messages = messages + "/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr is not 0. This will cause problems with qemu so please fix the value (as root).\n\nTo fix this in later reboots, set vm.mmap_min_addr = 0 in /etc/sysctl.conf.\n"
> > -                f.close()
> > +                f = open("/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr", "r")
> > +                try:
> > +                    if (int(f.read().strip()) < 65536):
> > +                        messages = messages + "/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr is not >= 65536. This will cause problems with qemu so please fix the value (as root).\n\nTo fix this in later reboots, set vm.mmap_min_addr = 65536 in /etc/sysctl.conf.\n"
> > +                finally:
> > +                    f.close()
> >          except:
> >              pass
> >  
> 
> corner cases when it cannot be read are with kernel between
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=0e1a6ef2dea88101b056b6d9984f3325c5efced3
> 2.6.33-rc2-0e1a6ef2dea88101b056b6d9984f3325c5efced3
> 
> and
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=822cceec7248013821d655545ea45d1c6a9d15b3
> 2.6.34-rc3-822cceec7248013821d655545ea45d1c6a9d15b3
> 
> see:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org/msg02340.html
> 
> Don't know if any large distribution is using 2.6.34 without that 2nd
> patch backported.

My laptop at least is running a kernel where that file isn't
readable :/. It isn't a standard distro one though.

Cheers,

Richard

Re: [PATCHv3 4/6] sanity.bbclass: Check for /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr to be >= 65536

[Khem Raj]

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Richard Purdie
<richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 08:15 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 10:52:45PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
>> > * Now qemu can handle lower values we can chnage this sanity test
>> >   to check of values if less than 65536
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
>> > ---
>> >  meta/classes/sanity.bbclass |   10 ++++++----
>> >  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass b/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass
>> > index 13940f8..aae5028 100644
>> > --- a/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass
>> > +++ b/meta/classes/sanity.bbclass
>> > @@ -170,10 +170,12 @@ def check_sanity(e):
>> >          # This path is no longer user-readable in modern (very recent) Linux
>> >          try:
>> >              if os.path.exists("/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr"):
>> > -                f = file("/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr", "r")
>> > -                if (f.read().strip() != "0"):
>> > -                        messages = messages + "/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr is not 0. This will cause problems with qemu so please fix the value (as root).\n\nTo fix this in later reboots, set vm.mmap_min_addr = 0 in /etc/sysctl.conf.\n"
>> > -                f.close()
>> > +                f = open("/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr", "r")
>> > +                try:
>> > +                    if (int(f.read().strip()) < 65536):
>> > +                        messages = messages + "/proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr is not >= 65536. This will cause problems with qemu so please fix the value (as root).\n\nTo fix this in later reboots, set vm.mmap_min_addr = 65536 in /etc/sysctl.conf.\n"
>> > +                finally:
>> > +                    f.close()
>> >          except:
>> >              pass
>> >
>>
>> corner cases when it cannot be read are with kernel between
>>
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=0e1a6ef2dea88101b056b6d9984f3325c5efced3
>> 2.6.33-rc2-0e1a6ef2dea88101b056b6d9984f3325c5efced3
>>
>> and
>>
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=822cceec7248013821d655545ea45d1c6a9d15b3
>> 2.6.34-rc3-822cceec7248013821d655545ea45d1c6a9d15b3
>>
>> see:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org/msg02340.html
>>
>> Don't know if any large distribution is using 2.6.34 without that 2nd
>> patch backported.
>
> My laptop at least is running a kernel where that file isn't
> readable :/. It isn't a standard distro one though.
>

see v3

[PATCHv3 5/6] poky-default.inc: Change LINUXLIBCVERSION "2.6.36" -> "2.6.37.2"

[Khem Raj]

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
---
 meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default.inc |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default.inc
index ef9f5cf..3ec5e1d 100644
--- a/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default.inc
+++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default.inc
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ GCCVERSION ?= "4.5.1"
 SDKGCCVERSION ?= "4.5.1"
 BINUVERSION ?= "2.21"
 GLIBCVERSION ?= "2.10.1"
-LINUXLIBCVERSION ?= "2.6.36"
+LINUXLIBCVERSION ?= "2.6.37.2"
 
 # Temporary preferred version overrides for PPC
 PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot-mkimage-native_powerpc ?= "2009.08"
-- 
1.7.4.1

Re: [PATCHv3 5/6] poky-default.inc: Change LINUXLIBCVERSION "2.6.36" -> "2.6.37.2"

[Khem Raj]

ping

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
> ---
>  meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default.inc |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default.inc
> index ef9f5cf..3ec5e1d 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default.inc
> +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default.inc
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ GCCVERSION ?= "4.5.1"
>  SDKGCCVERSION ?= "4.5.1"
>  BINUVERSION ?= "2.21"
>  GLIBCVERSION ?= "2.10.1"
> -LINUXLIBCVERSION ?= "2.6.36"
> +LINUXLIBCVERSION ?= "2.6.37.2"
>
>  # Temporary preferred version overrides for PPC
>  PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot-mkimage-native_powerpc ?= "2009.08"
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>
>

Re: [PATCHv3 5/6] poky-default.inc: Change LINUXLIBCVERSION "2.6.36" -> "2.6.37.2"

[Richard Purdie]

On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 22:52 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
> ---
>  meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default.inc |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default.inc
> index ef9f5cf..3ec5e1d 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default.inc
> +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default.inc
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ GCCVERSION ?= "4.5.1"
>  SDKGCCVERSION ?= "4.5.1"
>  BINUVERSION ?= "2.21"
>  GLIBCVERSION ?= "2.10.1"
> -LINUXLIBCVERSION ?= "2.6.36"
> +LINUXLIBCVERSION ?= "2.6.37.2"
>  
>  # Temporary preferred version overrides for PPC
>  PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot-mkimage-native_powerpc ?= "2009.08"

Merged to master, thanks.

Richard

[PATCHv3 6/6] rpm: Fix linking error encountered in rpm-native

[Khem Raj]

* This patch passes the correct LDFLAGS to account for
  additional dependencies of librpmio on libbeecrypt and libsyck
  and hence fixes the build error.

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
---
 .../rpm/rpm/rpm-tools-mtree-LDFLAGS.patch          |   13 +++++++++++++
 meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.0.bb             |    3 ++-
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-tools-mtree-LDFLAGS.patch

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-tools-mtree-LDFLAGS.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-tools-mtree-LDFLAGS.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..347d976
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-tools-mtree-LDFLAGS.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+Index: rpm-5.4.0/tools/Makefile.am
+===================================================================
+--- rpm-5.4.0.orig/tools/Makefile.am
++++ rpm-5.4.0/tools/Makefile.am
+@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ grep_LDADD =		$(RPMIO_LDADD_COMMON)
+ 
+ mtree_SOURCES =		rpmmtree.c
+ mtree_LDFLAGS =		@LDFLAGS_STATIC@ $(LDFLAGS)
+-mtree_LDADD =		$(RPM_LDADD_COMMON)
++mtree_LDADD =		$(RPMIO_LDADD_COMMON)
+ 
+ rpmrepo_SOURCES =	rpmrepo.c
+ rpmrepo_CPPFLAGS =	$(AM_CPPFLAGS) -I$(top_srcdir)/scripts -I$(top_builddir)/scripts $(CPPFLAGS)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.0.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.0.bb
index 0003f48..3704816 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.0.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.0.bb
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ LICENSE = "LGPL 2.1"
 LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING.LIB;md5=2d5025d4aa3495befef8f17206a5b0a1"
 
 DEPENDS = "bzip2 zlib python perl db openssl elfutils expat libpcre attr acl popt"
-PR = "r13"
+PR = "r14"
 
 # rpm2cpio is a shell script, which is part of the rpm src.rpm.  It is needed
 # in order to extract the distribution SRPM into a format we can extract...
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ SRC_URI = "http://www.rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/rpm-5.4.0-0.20101229.src.rpm;ex
 	   file://rpm-showrc.patch \
 	   file://rpm-nofsync.patch \
 	   file://rpm-solvedb.patch \
+	   file://rpm-tools-mtree-LDFLAGS.patch \
 	  "
 
 #           file://hdraddorappend.patch \
-- 
1.7.4.1

Re: [PATCHv3 6/6] rpm: Fix linking error encountered in rpm-native

[Richard Purdie]

Hi Khem,

On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 22:52 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> * This patch passes the correct LDFLAGS to account for
>   additional dependencies of librpmio on libbeecrypt and libsyck
>   and hence fixes the build error.

This change is fine in itself but I'm going to be a little critical here
since we're just getting going and I want to start as we mean to go on.

Could you add a description of the problem and why the fix is needed to
the patch header please, also adding your name and a date.

The reason why is so in six months time, someone looking at this can
work out a) why the patch is needed, b) Who wrote it so they have some
idea where it came from and who to talk to if they have a question and
c) How long the issue has been around for.

I appreciate some of this info can be got through the SCM but I've yet
to see a good reason for not including it directly in the patch header.

Cheers,

Richard

> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../rpm/rpm/rpm-tools-mtree-LDFLAGS.patch          |   13 +++++++++++++
>  meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.0.bb             |    3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-tools-mtree-LDFLAGS.patch
> 
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-tools-mtree-LDFLAGS.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-tools-mtree-LDFLAGS.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..347d976
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-tools-mtree-LDFLAGS.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +Index: rpm-5.4.0/tools/Makefile.am
> +===================================================================
> +--- rpm-5.4.0.orig/tools/Makefile.am
> ++++ rpm-5.4.0/tools/Makefile.am
> +@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ grep_LDADD =		$(RPMIO_LDADD_COMMON)
> + 
> + mtree_SOURCES =		rpmmtree.c
> + mtree_LDFLAGS =		@LDFLAGS_STATIC@ $(LDFLAGS)
> +-mtree_LDADD =		$(RPM_LDADD_COMMON)
> ++mtree_LDADD =		$(RPMIO_LDADD_COMMON)
> + 
> + rpmrepo_SOURCES =	rpmrepo.c
> + rpmrepo_CPPFLAGS =	$(AM_CPPFLAGS) -I$(top_srcdir)/scripts -I$(top_builddir)/scripts $(CPPFLAGS)
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.0.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.0.bb
> index 0003f48..3704816 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.0.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.0.bb
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ LICENSE = "LGPL 2.1"
>  LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING.LIB;md5=2d5025d4aa3495befef8f17206a5b0a1"
>  
>  DEPENDS = "bzip2 zlib python perl db openssl elfutils expat libpcre attr acl popt"
> -PR = "r13"
> +PR = "r14"
>  
>  # rpm2cpio is a shell script, which is part of the rpm src.rpm.  It is needed
>  # in order to extract the distribution SRPM into a format we can extract...
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ SRC_URI = "http://www.rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/rpm-5.4.0-0.20101229.src.rpm;ex
>  	   file://rpm-showrc.patch \
>  	   file://rpm-nofsync.patch \
>  	   file://rpm-solvedb.patch \
> +	   file://rpm-tools-mtree-LDFLAGS.patch \
>  	  "
>  
>  #           file://hdraddorappend.patch \

Re: [PATCHv3 6/6] rpm: Fix linking error encountered in rpm-native

[Koen Kooi]

Op 3 mrt 2011, om 13:07 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:

> Hi Khem,
> 
> On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 22:52 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
>> * This patch passes the correct LDFLAGS to account for
>>  additional dependencies of librpmio on libbeecrypt and libsyck
>>  and hence fixes the build error.
> 
> This change is fine in itself but I'm going to be a little critical here
> since we're just getting going and I want to start as we mean to go on.
> 
> Could you add a description of the problem and why the fix is needed to
> the patch header please, also adding your name and a date.
> 
> The reason why is so in six months time, someone looking at this can
> work out a) why the patch is needed, b) Who wrote it so they have some
> idea where it came from and who to talk to if they have a question and
> c) How long the issue has been around for.
> 
> I appreciate some of this info can be got through the SCM but I've yet
> to see a good reason for not including it directly in the patch header.

I have customers that make tarball snapshots of OE without the .git, so please put a lot of info in patch headers.

regards,

Koen