public inbox for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Richard Purdie" <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Claudius Heine <ch@denx.de>,
	openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org,
	 Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com>,
	Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND for ML] wic: imager/direct: passno is set to 0 for all entries in the fstab
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 10:02:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f75a25804d34913e592233c06a9dfdafe6be0830.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d99177cb-0258-dc14-6f39-8b00e2b64415@denx.de>

On Fri, 2020-11-06 at 10:07 +0100, Claudius Heine wrote:
> I looked into periodic file system checks for ext* partitions, in
> order to increase robustness for systems that use those file systems
> and was  surprised that the fstab that wic generates that `0` hard
> coded as the  passno parameter [1]. This prevents for instance
> systemd-fsck@(8) [2]  from running checks on those file systems.
> 
> It seems that wic/mic generated a fstab with passno=0 from the
> beginning 
> [3]. What is the reason for that? Was it a conscious decision to do 
> that, or just copy&paste for a different project?
> 
> How would a way forward look like? Should a patch that changes passno
> from 0 to 2 be enough, or do we rather have this parameter
> configurable somehow?

I suspect changing things so fsck was run at every boot would upset
existing use cases, particularly on ext2/3 systems without a journal.
The only option would therefore me to make it configurable.

Cheers,

Richard


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-06 10:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-06  9:07 [RESEND for ML] wic: imager/direct: passno is set to 0 for all entries in the fstab Claudius Heine
2020-11-06 10:02 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2020-11-06 10:27   ` [PATCH] wic: added fspassno parameter to partition Claudius Heine
2022-05-13 14:40     ` Henning Schild
2022-05-15  6:36       ` [PATCH v2] " Vijai Kumar K
2022-05-17 18:16         ` Schmidl, Tobias
2022-05-17 18:21           ` Kanagarajan, Vijaikumar
2022-05-17 18:31             ` Henning Schild
2022-05-15  6:40       ` [PATCH] " Kanagarajan, Vijaikumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f75a25804d34913e592233c06a9dfdafe6be0830.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ch@denx.de \
    --cc=henning.schild@siemens.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox