Linux maintainer tooling and workflows
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: "Kernel.org Tools" <tools@kernel.org>
Cc: "Christian Brauner (Amutable)" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	 Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH b4 v2 33/44] tests: cover create_review_branch cleaning up a half-built branch
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 23:59:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731-work-b4-editor-branch-guard-v2-33-243fd19d322d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731-work-b4-editor-branch-guard-v2-0-243fd19d322d@kernel.org>

Both starting points with the patch range failing to read: from a
branch and from a detached HEAD. The detached case starts at the tip
rather than the base, so restoring to the base would not pass.

Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
---
 src/tests/test_review.py | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/tests/test_review.py b/src/tests/test_review.py
index 5fdb608..4f56689 100644
--- a/src/tests/test_review.py
+++ b/src/tests/test_review.py
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ import email.message
 import importlib.util
 import json
 import logging
+import os
 from typing import Any, Dict, Iterator, List, Optional, Tuple, Union
 from unittest import mock
 
@@ -4763,3 +4764,94 @@ class TestArchiveSeries:
         # Nothing was destroyed, so the maintainer can simply retry
         assert b4.git_branch_exists(repo, branch)
         assert self._db_status() == 'accepted'
+
+
+class TestCreateReviewBranchCleanup:
+    """A branch that cannot be finished is not left checked out."""
+
+    @staticmethod
+    def _seed_fetch_head(gitdir: str) -> Tuple[str, str]:
+        """Leave a commit for the cherry-pick to land, as FETCH_HEAD.
+
+        Returns (base, tip): the commit to build the review branch on, and
+        the one waiting in FETCH_HEAD.
+        """
+        ecode, base = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['rev-parse', 'HEAD'])
+        assert ecode == 0
+        base = base.strip()
+
+        with open(os.path.join(gitdir, 'file1.txt'), 'a') as fh:
+            fh.write('review branch cleanup\n')
+        b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['add', 'file1.txt'])
+        ecode, _out = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['commit', '-m', 'cleanup test'])
+        assert ecode == 0
+        ecode, tip = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['rev-parse', 'HEAD'])
+        assert ecode == 0
+        tip = tip.strip()
+        with open(os.path.join(gitdir, '.git', 'FETCH_HEAD'), 'w') as fh:
+            fh.write(f'{tip}\t\tbranch\n')
+        ecode, _out = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['reset', '--hard', base])
+        assert ecode == 0
+        return base, tip
+
+    @staticmethod
+    def _create_with_unreadable_range(gitdir: str, branch: str, base: str) -> None:
+        """Run create_review_branch() with the patch range failing to read."""
+        real_run = b4.git_run_command
+
+        def _fail_revlist(
+            topdir: Any, args: List[str], *a: Any, **kw: Any
+        ) -> Tuple[int, Union[str, bytes]]:
+            if args[:2] == ['rev-list', '--reverse']:
+                return 1, ''
+            return real_run(topdir, args, *a, **kw)
+
+        with mock.patch.object(b4, 'git_run_command', side_effect=_fail_revlist):
+            with pytest.raises(SystemExit):
+                review.create_review_branch(
+                    gitdir,
+                    branch,
+                    base,
+                    b4.LoreSeries(1, 1),
+                    'https://example.com/x',
+                    'https://example.com/%s',
+                )
+
+    def test_cleans_up_when_the_patch_range_cannot_be_read(self, gitdir: str) -> None:
+        """Everything between the checkout and the tracking commit runs with
+        HEAD already on the new branch.  Bailing out there without restoring
+        leaves the caller standing on a branch that was never finished, which
+        the two neighbouring failures below it already knew to avoid."""
+        ecode, _out = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['checkout', '-q', '-b', 'work'])
+        assert ecode == 0
+        base, _tip = self._seed_fetch_head(gitdir)
+
+        branch = 'b4/review/cleanup-test'
+        self._create_with_unreadable_range(gitdir, branch, base)
+
+        assert b4.git_get_current_branch(gitdir) == 'work'
+        assert not b4.git_branch_exists(gitdir, branch)
+
+    def test_cleans_up_from_a_detached_head(self, gitdir: str) -> None:
+        """A detached HEAD has no branch name to go back to, and skipping the
+        restore on that account costs both halves of the cleanup: git refuses
+        to delete the branch HEAD is standing on, so the caller keeps the
+        stranding *and* the leftover.  The name comes from the change-id, so
+        the next attempt at that series then walks into 'already exists'.
+
+        Detached at the FETCH_HEAD tip rather than at the base, so restoring
+        to the base the branch was created at does not pass for remembering
+        where HEAD actually was.
+        """
+        base, tip = self._seed_fetch_head(gitdir)
+        ecode, _out = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['checkout', '-q', '--detach', tip])
+        assert ecode == 0
+
+        branch = 'b4/review/cleanup-detached'
+        self._create_with_unreadable_range(gitdir, branch, base)
+
+        assert b4.git_get_current_branch(gitdir) is None
+        ecode, head = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['rev-parse', 'HEAD'])
+        assert ecode == 0
+        assert head.strip() == tip
+        assert not b4.git_branch_exists(gitdir, branch)

-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-31 21:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-31 21:58 [PATCH b4 v2 00/44] Stop the editor branch guard from eating review replies Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 01/44] review-tui: mark all outgoing mail as read, not just " Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 02/44] tests: cover the shared outgoing-seen helper Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 03/44] review: close the messages database when auto-marking fails Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 04/44] review: use the same busy timeout for both review databases Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 05/44] review: drop the unused return value from set_flags_bulk() Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 06/44] review: don't let archiving a series raise Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 07/44] tests: cover an unwritable series archive Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 08/44] review-tui: keep post-send bookkeeping out of the send error path Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 09/44] tests: cover the thank-you send's post-send bookkeeping Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 10/44] review-tui: say which way a take did not reach 'accepted' Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 11/44] tests: cover the take statuses in the thank-and-archive chain Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 12/44] review-tui: use the shared helper to delete a review branch Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 13/44] ty: check reachability in the repository the commit landed in Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 14/44] tests: cover the publish check using the repository it is given Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 15/44] edit_in_editor: make the branch guard opt-in Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 16/44] tests: cover the opt-in branch guard in edit_in_editor Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 17/44] edit_in_editor: work in the tree the caller names Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 18/44] tests: cover edit_in_editor working in the caller's tree Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 19/44] ty: edit the thank-you review in the tree it was pointed at Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 20/44] tests: cover the ty review editing in the named tree Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 21/44] tui: route editor launches through one non-fatal helper Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 22/44] tests: cover an editor failure leaving the review TUI standing Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 23/44] review-tui: only put back a branch b4 checked out itself Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 24/44] tests: cover the review TUI's branch-restore guard Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 25/44] review-tui: put HEAD back where it was when it was not on a branch Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 26/44] tests: cover the restore from a detached HEAD Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 27/44] tests: pin the default branch in the queue-delivery fixture Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 28/44] ty: an unknown remote tip is undetermined, not unpublished Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 29/44] review-tui: keep post-send bookkeeping out of the review send error path Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 30/44] tests: cover the review send's post-send bookkeeping Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 31/44] review: close the tracking database when archiving fails Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 32/44] review: clean up a review branch that cannot be finished Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 34/44] review-tui: put the branch back after a revision upgrade Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 35/44] tests: cover the revision upgrade's branch handling Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 36/44] review-tui: restore the original branch however the tracking loop ends Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 37/44] review-tui: do not let a failed tracking load skip the branch restore Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 38/44] tests: cover the tracking TUI restoring the branch on the way out Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 39/44] review-tui: close the tracking database when the status sync fails Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 40/44] tests: cover the status sync closing its database Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 41/44] review-tui: catch the exit a failed checkout reports itself with Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 42/44] tests: cover a failed checkout leaving the tracking list standing Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 43/44] review-tui: put the user back when the branch they are on is deleted Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 44/44] tests: cover the branch delete leaving the worktree on a branch Christian Brauner
2026-08-03 14:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 00/44] Stop the editor branch guard from eating review replies Konstantin Ryabitsev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260731-work-b4-editor-branch-guard-v2-33-243fd19d322d@kernel.org \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tools@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox