Linux maintainer tooling and workflows
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: "Kernel.org Tools" <tools@kernel.org>
Cc: "Christian Brauner (Amutable)" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	 Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH b4 v2 44/44] tests: cover the branch delete leaving the worktree on a branch
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 23:59:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731-work-b4-editor-branch-guard-v2-44-243fd19d322d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731-work-b4-editor-branch-guard-v2-0-243fd19d322d@kernel.org>

Abandoning and archiving both get a case. A session that started
detached gets its own commit back, and deleting a branch HEAD was
never on moves nothing.

Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
---
 src/tests/test_tui_tracking.py | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 136 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/tests/test_tui_tracking.py b/src/tests/test_tui_tracking.py
index 5a8b914..37f0e85 100644
--- a/src/tests/test_tui_tracking.py
+++ b/src/tests/test_tui_tracking.py
@@ -1649,6 +1649,142 @@ class TestTrackingAbandon:
             assert cursor.fetchone() is None
             conn.close()
 
+    @pytest.mark.asyncio
+    async def test_abandon_from_the_branch_lands_on_a_branch(self, gitdir: str) -> None:
+        """Deleting the branch HEAD is on detaches it to the parent commit
+        first, because that is all delete_review_branch() can name.  Left
+        that way the session ends on a commit with no branch on it, and the
+        restore in run_tracking_tui() reads a detached HEAD as no branch of
+        ours and declines to help."""
+        identifier = 'test-abandon-onbranch'
+        change_id = 'abandon-onbranch-1'
+        branch_name = _create_review_branch(gitdir, change_id, identifier=identifier)
+        _seed_db(
+            identifier,
+            [
+                {
+                    'change_id': change_id,
+                    'subject': '[PATCH] abandon from the branch',
+                    'status': 'reviewing',
+                    'message_id': 'abo@ex.com',
+                }
+            ],
+        )
+        ecode, _out = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['checkout', '-q', branch_name])
+        assert ecode == 0
+
+        app = TrackingApp(identifier, 'master')
+        async with app.run_test(size=(120, 30)) as pilot:
+            await pilot.pause()
+            app._on_abandon_confirmed(True, change_id, branch_name, True)
+            await pilot.pause()
+
+        assert not b4.git_branch_exists(gitdir, branch_name)
+        assert b4.git_get_current_branch(gitdir) == 'master'
+
+    @pytest.mark.asyncio
+    async def test_archive_from_the_branch_lands_on_a_branch(self, gitdir: str) -> None:
+        """Archiving deletes the branch at the end, so it detaches HEAD the
+        same way abandoning does."""
+        identifier = 'test-archive-onbranch'
+        change_id = 'archive-onbranch-1'
+        branch_name = _create_review_branch(
+            gitdir, change_id, identifier=identifier, with_patch=True
+        )
+        _seed_db(
+            identifier,
+            [
+                {
+                    'change_id': change_id,
+                    'subject': '[PATCH] archive from the branch',
+                    'status': 'accepted',
+                    'message_id': 'aro@ex.com',
+                }
+            ],
+        )
+        ecode, _out = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['checkout', '-q', branch_name])
+        assert ecode == 0
+
+        app = TrackingApp(identifier, 'master')
+        async with app.run_test(size=(120, 30)) as pilot:
+            await pilot.pause()
+            assert app._archive_branch(change_id, 1, branch_name)
+            await pilot.pause()
+
+        assert not b4.git_branch_exists(gitdir, branch_name)
+        assert b4.git_get_current_branch(gitdir) == 'master'
+
+    @pytest.mark.asyncio
+    async def test_abandon_lands_back_on_a_detached_head(self, gitdir: str) -> None:
+        """A session that started detached came from a commit, not a branch.
+
+        delete_review_branch() can only name the deleted branch's parent, so
+        without the session's own starting point the user is left parked on
+        whatever that happens to be."""
+        identifier = 'test-abandon-detached'
+        change_id = 'abandon-detached-1'
+        branch_name = _create_review_branch(gitdir, change_id, identifier=identifier)
+        _seed_db(
+            identifier,
+            [
+                {
+                    'change_id': change_id,
+                    'subject': '[PATCH] abandon detached',
+                    'status': 'reviewing',
+                    'message_id': 'abd@ex.com',
+                }
+            ],
+        )
+        ecode, out = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['rev-parse', 'master'])
+        assert ecode == 0
+        start_sha = out.strip()
+        ecode, _out = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['checkout', '-q', branch_name])
+        assert ecode == 0
+
+        app = TrackingApp(
+            identifier, None, original_head=['checkout', '--detach', start_sha]
+        )
+        async with app.run_test(size=(120, 30)) as pilot:
+            await pilot.pause()
+            app._on_abandon_confirmed(True, change_id, branch_name, True)
+            await pilot.pause()
+
+        assert not b4.git_branch_exists(gitdir, branch_name)
+        assert b4.git_get_current_branch(gitdir) is None
+        ecode, out = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['rev-parse', 'HEAD'])
+        assert ecode == 0
+        assert out.strip() == start_sha
+
+    @pytest.mark.asyncio
+    async def test_abandon_from_elsewhere_leaves_head_alone(self, gitdir: str) -> None:
+        """HEAD was never on the deleted branch, so nothing moved it and
+        nothing should move it back."""
+        identifier = 'test-abandon-elsewhere'
+        change_id = 'abandon-elsewhere-1'
+        branch_name = _create_review_branch(gitdir, change_id, identifier=identifier)
+        _seed_db(
+            identifier,
+            [
+                {
+                    'change_id': change_id,
+                    'subject': '[PATCH] abandon from elsewhere',
+                    'status': 'reviewing',
+                    'message_id': 'abe@ex.com',
+                }
+            ],
+        )
+        ecode, _out = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['checkout', '-q', '-b', 'mine'])
+        assert ecode == 0
+
+        app = TrackingApp(identifier, 'master')
+        async with app.run_test(size=(120, 30)) as pilot:
+            await pilot.pause()
+            app._on_abandon_confirmed(True, change_id, branch_name, True)
+            await pilot.pause()
+
+        assert not b4.git_branch_exists(gitdir, branch_name)
+        assert b4.git_get_current_branch(gitdir) == 'mine'
+
 
 class TestTrackingWaiting:
     """Tests for the 'mark as waiting' workflow."""

-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-31 21:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-31 21:58 [PATCH b4 v2 00/44] Stop the editor branch guard from eating review replies Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 01/44] review-tui: mark all outgoing mail as read, not just " Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 02/44] tests: cover the shared outgoing-seen helper Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 03/44] review: close the messages database when auto-marking fails Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 04/44] review: use the same busy timeout for both review databases Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 05/44] review: drop the unused return value from set_flags_bulk() Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 06/44] review: don't let archiving a series raise Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 07/44] tests: cover an unwritable series archive Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 08/44] review-tui: keep post-send bookkeeping out of the send error path Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 09/44] tests: cover the thank-you send's post-send bookkeeping Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 10/44] review-tui: say which way a take did not reach 'accepted' Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 11/44] tests: cover the take statuses in the thank-and-archive chain Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 12/44] review-tui: use the shared helper to delete a review branch Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 13/44] ty: check reachability in the repository the commit landed in Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 14/44] tests: cover the publish check using the repository it is given Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 15/44] edit_in_editor: make the branch guard opt-in Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 16/44] tests: cover the opt-in branch guard in edit_in_editor Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 17/44] edit_in_editor: work in the tree the caller names Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 18/44] tests: cover edit_in_editor working in the caller's tree Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 19/44] ty: edit the thank-you review in the tree it was pointed at Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 20/44] tests: cover the ty review editing in the named tree Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 21/44] tui: route editor launches through one non-fatal helper Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 22/44] tests: cover an editor failure leaving the review TUI standing Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 23/44] review-tui: only put back a branch b4 checked out itself Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 24/44] tests: cover the review TUI's branch-restore guard Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 25/44] review-tui: put HEAD back where it was when it was not on a branch Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 26/44] tests: cover the restore from a detached HEAD Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 27/44] tests: pin the default branch in the queue-delivery fixture Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 28/44] ty: an unknown remote tip is undetermined, not unpublished Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 29/44] review-tui: keep post-send bookkeeping out of the review send error path Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 30/44] tests: cover the review send's post-send bookkeeping Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 31/44] review: close the tracking database when archiving fails Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 32/44] review: clean up a review branch that cannot be finished Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 33/44] tests: cover create_review_branch cleaning up a half-built branch Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 34/44] review-tui: put the branch back after a revision upgrade Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 35/44] tests: cover the revision upgrade's branch handling Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 36/44] review-tui: restore the original branch however the tracking loop ends Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 37/44] review-tui: do not let a failed tracking load skip the branch restore Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 38/44] tests: cover the tracking TUI restoring the branch on the way out Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 39/44] review-tui: close the tracking database when the status sync fails Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 40/44] tests: cover the status sync closing its database Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 41/44] review-tui: catch the exit a failed checkout reports itself with Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 42/44] tests: cover a failed checkout leaving the tracking list standing Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 43/44] review-tui: put the user back when the branch they are on is deleted Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2026-08-03 14:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 00/44] Stop the editor branch guard from eating review replies Konstantin Ryabitsev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260731-work-b4-editor-branch-guard-v2-44-243fd19d322d@kernel.org \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tools@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox