Linux maintainer tooling and workflows
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: "Kernel.org Tools" <tools@kernel.org>
Cc: "Christian Brauner (Amutable)" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	 Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH b4 v2 35/44] tests: cover the revision upgrade's branch handling
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 23:59:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731-work-b4-editor-branch-guard-v2-35-243fd19d322d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731-work-b4-editor-branch-guard-v2-0-243fd19d322d@kernel.org>

A finished upgrade puts the worktree back on the branch, or on the
commit when it started detached. A create that exits leaves neither
the upgrade branch nor the checkout behind. An abandoned apply removes
an earlier attempt's leftover upgrade branch.

Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
---
 src/tests/test_tui_tracking.py | 270 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 270 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/tests/test_tui_tracking.py b/src/tests/test_tui_tracking.py
index 09d1fea..7b2ffb9 100644
--- a/src/tests/test_tui_tracking.py
+++ b/src/tests/test_tui_tracking.py
@@ -4074,6 +4074,276 @@ class TestUpdateRevisionWorkflow:
             # Should return to tracking list, not exit to review
             assert app.is_running
 
+    @pytest.mark.asyncio
+    async def test_successful_upgrade_restores_original_branch(
+        self, gitdir: str
+    ) -> None:
+        """A finished upgrade puts the worktree back where it found it.
+
+        create_review_branch() checks HEAD out onto the upgrade branch and the
+        swap renames that onto the review branch, so HEAD is left sitting on
+        the review branch.  The tracking list comes back up when this returns,
+        and quitting from there stranded the user on the review branch.
+        """
+        identifier = 'test-update-restore'
+        change_id = 'update-restore-1'
+        review_branch = _setup_update_test(gitdir, identifier, change_id)
+
+        ecode, _out = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['checkout', '-q', '-b', 'work'])
+        assert ecode == 0
+
+        lser = _make_mock_lser()
+
+        def _fake_create(topdir: str, branch: str, *args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> None:
+            """Create the branch and check it out, as the real one does."""
+            _create_review_branch(
+                topdir,
+                branch.removeprefix('b4/review/'),
+                identifier=identifier,
+                revision=2,
+                status='reviewing',
+            )
+            ecode, _o = b4.git_run_command(topdir, ['checkout', '-q', branch])
+            assert ecode == 0
+
+        def _mock_archive(
+            self_app: TrackingApp,
+            cid: str,
+            rev: Optional[int],
+            rbranch: str,
+            pw_series_id: Optional[int] = None,
+            notify: bool = True,
+        ) -> bool:
+            b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['branch', '-D', rbranch])
+            aconn = tracking.get_db(self_app._identifier)
+            tracking.update_series_status(aconn, cid, 'archived', revision=rev)
+            aconn.close()
+            return True
+
+        app = TrackingApp(identifier)
+        async with app.run_test(size=(120, 30)) as pilot:
+            await pilot.pause()
+            with (
+                patch.object(
+                    app, 'suspend', return_value=__import__('contextlib').nullcontext()
+                ),
+                patch('b4.review_tui._tracking_app._wait_for_enter'),
+                patch('b4.git_fetch_am_into_repo'),
+                patch('b4.review.create_review_branch', side_effect=_fake_create),
+                patch('b4.review.get_review_branch_patch_ids', return_value=[]),
+                patch(
+                    'b4.review.load_tracking',
+                    return_value=('', {'series': {}, 'patches': []}),
+                ),
+                patch('b4.review.reanchor_patch_comments'),
+                patch('b4.review.save_tracking_ref'),
+                patch.object(TrackingApp, '_archive_branch', _mock_archive),
+            ):
+                app._on_update_base_selected(
+                    'HEAD',
+                    lser,
+                    b'mbox',
+                    1,
+                    change_id,
+                    1,
+                    2,
+                    'v2@ex.com',
+                    '[PATCH v2] update test',
+                    review_branch,
+                )
+            await pilot.pause()
+
+        # The upgrade landed, and the worktree is back on the user's branch.
+        assert b4.git_branch_exists(gitdir, review_branch)
+        assert b4.git_get_current_branch(gitdir) == 'work'
+
+    @pytest.mark.asyncio
+    async def test_upgrade_from_a_detached_head_puts_it_back(self, gitdir: str) -> None:
+        """A detached HEAD is where the user was too.
+
+        The upgrade renames the temporary branch onto the review branch and
+        HEAD follows, so a session that started detached ends up parked on a
+        branch it never asked for, with its own commit only in the reflog.
+        """
+        identifier = 'test-update-detached'
+        change_id = 'update-detached-1'
+        review_branch = _setup_update_test(gitdir, identifier, change_id)
+
+        ecode, _out = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['checkout', '-q', '--detach'])
+        assert ecode == 0
+        ecode, out = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['rev-parse', 'HEAD'])
+        assert ecode == 0
+        start_sha = out.strip()
+
+        lser = _make_mock_lser()
+
+        def _fake_create(topdir: str, branch: str, *args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> None:
+            _create_review_branch(
+                topdir,
+                branch.removeprefix('b4/review/'),
+                identifier=identifier,
+                revision=2,
+                status='reviewing',
+            )
+            ecode, _o = b4.git_run_command(topdir, ['checkout', '-q', branch])
+            assert ecode == 0
+
+        def _mock_archive(
+            self_app: TrackingApp,
+            cid: str,
+            rev: Optional[int],
+            rbranch: str,
+            pw_series_id: Optional[int] = None,
+            notify: bool = True,
+        ) -> bool:
+            b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['branch', '-D', rbranch])
+            aconn = tracking.get_db(self_app._identifier)
+            tracking.update_series_status(aconn, cid, 'archived', revision=rev)
+            aconn.close()
+            return True
+
+        app = TrackingApp(identifier)
+        async with app.run_test(size=(120, 30)) as pilot:
+            await pilot.pause()
+            with (
+                patch.object(
+                    app, 'suspend', return_value=__import__('contextlib').nullcontext()
+                ),
+                patch('b4.review_tui._tracking_app._wait_for_enter'),
+                patch('b4.git_fetch_am_into_repo'),
+                patch('b4.review.create_review_branch', side_effect=_fake_create),
+                patch('b4.review.get_review_branch_patch_ids', return_value=[]),
+                patch(
+                    'b4.review.load_tracking',
+                    return_value=('', {'series': {}, 'patches': []}),
+                ),
+                patch('b4.review.reanchor_patch_comments'),
+                patch('b4.review.save_tracking_ref'),
+                patch.object(TrackingApp, '_archive_branch', _mock_archive),
+            ):
+                app._on_update_base_selected(
+                    'HEAD',
+                    lser,
+                    b'mbox',
+                    1,
+                    change_id,
+                    1,
+                    2,
+                    'v2@ex.com',
+                    '[PATCH v2] update test',
+                    review_branch,
+                )
+            await pilot.pause()
+
+        assert b4.git_branch_exists(gitdir, review_branch)
+        assert b4.git_get_current_branch(gitdir) is None
+        ecode, out = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['rev-parse', 'HEAD'])
+        assert ecode == 0
+        assert out.strip() == start_sha
+
+    @pytest.mark.asyncio
+    async def test_apply_failure_restores_original_branch(self, gitdir: str) -> None:
+        """A create that moves HEAD and then fails leaves nothing behind.
+
+        create_review_branch() reports failure by exiting rather than raising,
+        and SystemExit is not an Exception, so the handler has to catch it too
+        or the cleanup is skipped and the user is left standing on a half-built
+        upgrade branch.
+        """
+        identifier = 'test-update-failrestore'
+        change_id = 'update-failrestore-1'
+        review_branch = _setup_update_test(gitdir, identifier, change_id)
+        upgrade_branch = f'b4/review/_tmp-{change_id}-v2-upgrade'
+
+        ecode, _out = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['checkout', '-q', '-b', 'work'])
+        assert ecode == 0
+
+        lser = _make_mock_lser()
+
+        def _fake_create(topdir: str, branch: str, *args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> None:
+            """Move HEAD onto the new branch, then die the way the real one does."""
+            ecode, _o = b4.git_run_command(topdir, ['checkout', '-q', '-b', branch])
+            assert ecode == 0
+            raise SystemExit(1)
+
+        app = TrackingApp(identifier)
+        async with app.run_test(size=(120, 30)) as pilot:
+            await pilot.pause()
+            with (
+                patch.object(
+                    app, 'suspend', return_value=__import__('contextlib').nullcontext()
+                ),
+                patch('b4.review_tui._tracking_app._wait_for_enter'),
+                patch('b4.git_fetch_am_into_repo'),
+                patch('b4.review.create_review_branch', side_effect=_fake_create),
+            ):
+                app._on_update_base_selected(
+                    'HEAD',
+                    lser,
+                    b'mbox',
+                    1,
+                    change_id,
+                    1,
+                    2,
+                    'v2@ex.com',
+                    'subj',
+                    review_branch,
+                )
+            await pilot.pause()
+
+        assert b4.git_get_current_branch(gitdir) == 'work'
+        assert not b4.git_branch_exists(gitdir, upgrade_branch)
+        assert b4.git_branch_exists(gitdir, review_branch)
+
+    @pytest.mark.asyncio
+    async def test_abandoned_conflict_clears_a_leftover_branch(
+        self, gitdir: str
+    ) -> None:
+        """The upgrade branch name is derived from the series, so every
+        attempt at the same upgrade reuses it.  Backing out of the conflict
+        shell has to take an earlier attempt's leftover with it, or the next
+        attempt walks into create_review_branch() refusing the name."""
+        identifier = 'test-update-leftover'
+        change_id = 'update-leftover-1'
+        review_branch = _setup_update_test(gitdir, identifier, change_id)
+        upgrade_branch = f'b4/review/_tmp-{change_id}-v2-upgrade'
+
+        # An earlier attempt that ended somewhere without cleanup.
+        ecode, _out = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['branch', upgrade_branch])
+        assert ecode == 0
+
+        app = TrackingApp(identifier)
+        async with app.run_test(size=(120, 30)) as pilot:
+            await pilot.pause()
+            with (
+                patch.object(
+                    app, 'suspend', return_value=__import__('contextlib').nullcontext()
+                ),
+                patch('b4.review_tui._tracking_app._wait_for_enter'),
+                patch(
+                    'b4.git_fetch_am_into_repo',
+                    side_effect=b4.AmConflictError('/tmp/wt', 'conflict'),
+                ),
+                patch('b4.resolve_am_conflict_in_shell', return_value=False),
+            ):
+                app._on_update_base_selected(
+                    'HEAD',
+                    _make_mock_lser(),
+                    b'mbox',
+                    1,
+                    change_id,
+                    1,
+                    2,
+                    'v2@ex.com',
+                    'subj',
+                    review_branch,
+                )
+            await pilot.pause()
+
+        assert not b4.git_branch_exists(gitdir, upgrade_branch)
+        # Backing out costs the upgrade, never the series being upgraded.
+        assert b4.git_branch_exists(gitdir, review_branch)
+
     @pytest.mark.asyncio
     async def test_archive_failure_leaves_both_branches(self, gitdir: str) -> None:
         """If archiving fails, both branches are left for manual recovery."""

-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-31 21:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-31 21:58 [PATCH b4 v2 00/44] Stop the editor branch guard from eating review replies Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 01/44] review-tui: mark all outgoing mail as read, not just " Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 02/44] tests: cover the shared outgoing-seen helper Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 03/44] review: close the messages database when auto-marking fails Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 04/44] review: use the same busy timeout for both review databases Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 05/44] review: drop the unused return value from set_flags_bulk() Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 06/44] review: don't let archiving a series raise Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 07/44] tests: cover an unwritable series archive Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 08/44] review-tui: keep post-send bookkeeping out of the send error path Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 09/44] tests: cover the thank-you send's post-send bookkeeping Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 10/44] review-tui: say which way a take did not reach 'accepted' Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 11/44] tests: cover the take statuses in the thank-and-archive chain Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 12/44] review-tui: use the shared helper to delete a review branch Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 13/44] ty: check reachability in the repository the commit landed in Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 14/44] tests: cover the publish check using the repository it is given Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 15/44] edit_in_editor: make the branch guard opt-in Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 16/44] tests: cover the opt-in branch guard in edit_in_editor Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 17/44] edit_in_editor: work in the tree the caller names Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 18/44] tests: cover edit_in_editor working in the caller's tree Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 19/44] ty: edit the thank-you review in the tree it was pointed at Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 20/44] tests: cover the ty review editing in the named tree Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 21/44] tui: route editor launches through one non-fatal helper Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 22/44] tests: cover an editor failure leaving the review TUI standing Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 23/44] review-tui: only put back a branch b4 checked out itself Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 24/44] tests: cover the review TUI's branch-restore guard Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 25/44] review-tui: put HEAD back where it was when it was not on a branch Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 26/44] tests: cover the restore from a detached HEAD Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 27/44] tests: pin the default branch in the queue-delivery fixture Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 28/44] ty: an unknown remote tip is undetermined, not unpublished Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 29/44] review-tui: keep post-send bookkeeping out of the review send error path Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 30/44] tests: cover the review send's post-send bookkeeping Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 31/44] review: close the tracking database when archiving fails Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 32/44] review: clean up a review branch that cannot be finished Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 33/44] tests: cover create_review_branch cleaning up a half-built branch Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 34/44] review-tui: put the branch back after a revision upgrade Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 36/44] review-tui: restore the original branch however the tracking loop ends Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 37/44] review-tui: do not let a failed tracking load skip the branch restore Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 38/44] tests: cover the tracking TUI restoring the branch on the way out Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 39/44] review-tui: close the tracking database when the status sync fails Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 40/44] tests: cover the status sync closing its database Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 41/44] review-tui: catch the exit a failed checkout reports itself with Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 42/44] tests: cover a failed checkout leaving the tracking list standing Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 43/44] review-tui: put the user back when the branch they are on is deleted Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 44/44] tests: cover the branch delete leaving the worktree on a branch Christian Brauner
2026-08-03 14:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 00/44] Stop the editor branch guard from eating review replies Konstantin Ryabitsev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260731-work-b4-editor-branch-guard-v2-35-243fd19d322d@kernel.org \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tools@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox