Linux maintainer tooling and workflows
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: "Kernel.org Tools" <tools@kernel.org>
Cc: "Christian Brauner (Amutable)" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	 Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH b4 v2 38/44] tests: cover the tracking TUI restoring the branch on the way out
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 23:59:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260731-work-b4-editor-branch-guard-v2-38-243fd19d322d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260731-work-b4-editor-branch-guard-v2-0-243fd19d322d@kernel.org>

Three ways the restore was missed: a tracking app that moves HEAD and
quits, the same from a detached HEAD, and a status sync whose tracking
read exits rather than raising.

Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
---
 src/tests/test_tui_tracking.py | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 107 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/tests/test_tui_tracking.py b/src/tests/test_tui_tracking.py
index 7b2ffb9..ef79aeb 100644
--- a/src/tests/test_tui_tracking.py
+++ b/src/tests/test_tui_tracking.py
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ from textual.widgets import Input, ListView, Static
 import b4
 import b4.review
 import b4.review.tracking as tracking
+import b4.review_tui._entry as _entry
 from b4 import (
     _abort_worktree_op,
     _worktree_has_unmerged,
@@ -5363,3 +5364,109 @@ class TestTestApplySubmoduleRecurse:
         screen = TakeConfirmScreen('linear', 'master', branch)
         ok, detail = screen._test_take()
         assert ok, f'take test-apply recursed: {detail}'
+
+
+class TestTrackingEntryBranchRestore:
+    """run_tracking_tui() puts the worktree back on the way out."""
+
+    def test_quitting_after_an_upgrade_restores_the_branch(self, gitdir: str) -> None:
+        """The tracking list has actions of its own that move HEAD.
+
+        Upgrading a series to a newer revision checks out an upgrade branch
+        and renames it onto the review branch.  Quitting from the list then
+        went straight out of the loop, past a restore that only ran after a
+        review pass, and left the worktree on the review branch.
+        """
+        ecode, _out = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['checkout', '-q', '-b', 'work'])
+        assert ecode == 0
+        review_branch = 'b4/review/entry-restore-1'
+
+        class _MovesHeadThenQuits:
+            PATCHWORK_SENTINEL = TrackingApp.PATCHWORK_SENTINEL
+
+            def __init__(
+                self, identifier: str, original_branch: Optional[str], **kw: Any
+            ) -> None:
+                pass
+
+            def run(self, mouse: bool = True) -> Optional[str]:
+                b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['checkout', '-q', '-b', review_branch])
+                return None
+
+        with patch.object(_entry, 'TrackingApp', _MovesHeadThenQuits):
+            _entry.run_tracking_tui('test-entry-restore')
+
+        assert b4.git_get_current_branch(gitdir) == 'work'
+
+    def test_quitting_after_an_upgrade_restores_a_detached_head(
+        self, gitdir: str
+    ) -> None:
+        """A session that started detached has a commit to go back to, and
+        putting the user on a branch instead is not restoring anything."""
+        ecode, out = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['rev-parse', 'HEAD'])
+        assert ecode == 0
+        start_sha = out.strip()
+        ecode, _out = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['checkout', '-q', '--detach'])
+        assert ecode == 0
+        review_branch = 'b4/review/entry-restore-detached'
+
+        class _MovesHeadThenQuits:
+            PATCHWORK_SENTINEL = TrackingApp.PATCHWORK_SENTINEL
+
+            def __init__(
+                self, identifier: str, original_branch: Optional[str], **kw: Any
+            ) -> None:
+                pass
+
+            def run(self, mouse: bool = True) -> Optional[str]:
+                b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['checkout', '-q', '-b', review_branch])
+                return None
+
+        with patch.object(_entry, 'TrackingApp', _MovesHeadThenQuits):
+            _entry.run_tracking_tui('test-entry-restore-detached')
+
+        assert b4.git_get_current_branch(gitdir) is None
+        ecode, out = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['rev-parse', 'HEAD'])
+        assert ecode == 0
+        assert out.strip() == start_sha
+
+    def test_a_failed_tracking_load_still_restores_the_branch(
+        self, gitdir: str
+    ) -> None:
+        """load_tracking() exits rather than raising on a branch carrying no
+        tracking commit, and SystemExit is not an Exception, so it sailed past
+        the status sync's guard and out of run_tracking_tui() -- taking the
+        branch restore with it."""
+        ecode, _out = b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['checkout', '-q', '-b', 'work'])
+        assert ecode == 0
+        review_branch = 'b4/review/entry-syncfail-1'
+        runs = {'n': 0}
+
+        class _ReviewsThenQuits:
+            PATCHWORK_SENTINEL = TrackingApp.PATCHWORK_SENTINEL
+
+            def __init__(
+                self, identifier: str, original_branch: Optional[str], **kw: Any
+            ) -> None:
+                pass
+
+            def run(self, mouse: bool = True) -> Optional[str]:
+                runs['n'] += 1
+                if runs['n'] > 1:
+                    return None
+                b4.git_run_command(gitdir, ['checkout', '-q', '-b', review_branch])
+                return review_branch
+
+        with (
+            patch.object(_entry, 'TrackingApp', _ReviewsThenQuits),
+            patch.object(_entry, 'ReviewApp'),
+            patch.object(
+                b4.review,
+                '_prepare_review_session',
+                return_value={'series': {'revision': 1}},
+            ),
+            patch.object(b4.review, 'load_tracking', side_effect=SystemExit(1)),
+        ):
+            _entry.run_tracking_tui('test-entry-syncfail')
+
+        assert b4.git_get_current_branch(gitdir) == 'work'

-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-31 21:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-31 21:58 [PATCH b4 v2 00/44] Stop the editor branch guard from eating review replies Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 01/44] review-tui: mark all outgoing mail as read, not just " Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 02/44] tests: cover the shared outgoing-seen helper Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 03/44] review: close the messages database when auto-marking fails Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 04/44] review: use the same busy timeout for both review databases Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 05/44] review: drop the unused return value from set_flags_bulk() Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 06/44] review: don't let archiving a series raise Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 07/44] tests: cover an unwritable series archive Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 08/44] review-tui: keep post-send bookkeeping out of the send error path Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 09/44] tests: cover the thank-you send's post-send bookkeeping Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 10/44] review-tui: say which way a take did not reach 'accepted' Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 11/44] tests: cover the take statuses in the thank-and-archive chain Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 12/44] review-tui: use the shared helper to delete a review branch Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 13/44] ty: check reachability in the repository the commit landed in Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 14/44] tests: cover the publish check using the repository it is given Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 15/44] edit_in_editor: make the branch guard opt-in Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 16/44] tests: cover the opt-in branch guard in edit_in_editor Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 17/44] edit_in_editor: work in the tree the caller names Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:58 ` [PATCH b4 v2 18/44] tests: cover edit_in_editor working in the caller's tree Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 19/44] ty: edit the thank-you review in the tree it was pointed at Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 20/44] tests: cover the ty review editing in the named tree Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 21/44] tui: route editor launches through one non-fatal helper Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 22/44] tests: cover an editor failure leaving the review TUI standing Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 23/44] review-tui: only put back a branch b4 checked out itself Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 24/44] tests: cover the review TUI's branch-restore guard Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 25/44] review-tui: put HEAD back where it was when it was not on a branch Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 26/44] tests: cover the restore from a detached HEAD Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 27/44] tests: pin the default branch in the queue-delivery fixture Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 28/44] ty: an unknown remote tip is undetermined, not unpublished Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 29/44] review-tui: keep post-send bookkeeping out of the review send error path Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 30/44] tests: cover the review send's post-send bookkeeping Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 31/44] review: close the tracking database when archiving fails Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 32/44] review: clean up a review branch that cannot be finished Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 33/44] tests: cover create_review_branch cleaning up a half-built branch Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 34/44] review-tui: put the branch back after a revision upgrade Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 35/44] tests: cover the revision upgrade's branch handling Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 36/44] review-tui: restore the original branch however the tracking loop ends Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 37/44] review-tui: do not let a failed tracking load skip the branch restore Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 39/44] review-tui: close the tracking database when the status sync fails Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 40/44] tests: cover the status sync closing its database Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 41/44] review-tui: catch the exit a failed checkout reports itself with Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 42/44] tests: cover a failed checkout leaving the tracking list standing Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 43/44] review-tui: put the user back when the branch they are on is deleted Christian Brauner
2026-07-31 21:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 44/44] tests: cover the branch delete leaving the worktree on a branch Christian Brauner
2026-08-03 14:59 ` [PATCH b4 v2 00/44] Stop the editor branch guard from eating review replies Konstantin Ryabitsev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260731-work-b4-editor-branch-guard-v2-38-243fd19d322d@kernel.org \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tools@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox