Discussion of the implementations of VIRTIO specification
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>,
	"virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org"
	<virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>,
	"sgarzare@redhat.com" <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
	"virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org"
	<virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>,
	Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@nvidia.com>
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: Participation (was: Re: [virtio-comment] RE: [virtio-dev] RE: [PATCH v12 03/10] content: Rename confusing queue_notify_data and vqn names)
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 07:45:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230417074243-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878reqlwss.fsf@redhat.com>

On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 10:47:47AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> I agree that patch reposting is happening much too fast in some
> cases. Not sure how to formalize that, either. Can we please just be
> more mindful of that? Reviewing time is not free. If I'm trying to do a
> timely review of something and constantly see new versions while I'm not
> finished yet, I do not feel like my feedback is actually valued.

Imagine a group of contributors working on spec 100% of time.
What do you want them to do? they need to exchange patches,
slowing them down because part time reviewers are overwhelmed
would be a waste. A separate mailing list would be one
solution. Some tag in the subject would be another. RFC?
Though RFC is used for other things as well...

-- 
MST


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org


  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-17 11:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-05  1:06 [virtio-dev] [PATCH v12 00/10] Rename queue number to queue index Parav Pandit
2023-04-05  1:06 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v12 01/10] content: Add vq index text Parav Pandit
2023-04-05  5:26   ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 13:00     ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05  9:18   ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 13:03     ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-07 11:30       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-07 15:34         ` Parav Pandit
2023-04-07 15:54           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05  1:06 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v12 02/10] content.tex Replace virtqueue number with index Parav Pandit
2023-04-05  9:46   ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2023-04-05  1:06 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v12 03/10] content: Rename confusing queue_notify_data and vqn names Parav Pandit
2023-04-05  5:22   ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 13:20     ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-10 13:25       ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05  5:30   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05  9:57     ` Cornelia Huck
2023-04-05 13:21     ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 15:27       ` Halil Pasic
2023-04-05 15:58         ` Parav Pandit
2023-04-07 11:43           ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-11  8:56             ` Cornelia Huck
2023-04-11 13:35               ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-17  3:18                 ` [virtio-dev] " Halil Pasic
2023-04-17  7:04                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-17  8:47                     ` [virtio-dev] Participation (was: Re: [virtio-comment] RE: [virtio-dev] RE: [PATCH v12 03/10] content: Rename confusing queue_notify_data and vqn names) Cornelia Huck
2023-04-17 11:45                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-04-17 16:13                     ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] RE: [virtio-dev] RE: [PATCH v12 03/10] content: Rename confusing queue_notify_data and vqn names Halil Pasic
2023-04-07 11:44       ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05  1:06 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v12 04/10] transport-pci: Avoid first vq index reference Parav Pandit
2023-04-05  1:06 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v12 05/10] transport-mmio: Rename QueueNum register Parav Pandit
2023-04-05  1:06 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v12 06/10] transport-mmio: Avoid referring to zero based index Parav Pandit
2023-04-05  1:06 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v12 07/10] transport-ccw: Rename queue depth/size to other transports Parav Pandit
2023-04-05  1:06 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v12 08/10] transport-ccw: Refer to the vq by its index Parav Pandit
2023-04-05  1:06 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v12 09/10] virtio-net: Avoid duplicate receive queue example Parav Pandit
2023-04-05  1:06 ` [virtio-dev] [PATCH v12 10/10] virtio-net: Describe RSS using rss rq id Parav Pandit
2023-04-05  9:17   ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 13:02     ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-07 11:32       ` [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05  5:32 ` [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v12 00/10] Rename queue number to queue index Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 13:11   ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05  9:20 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 13:05   ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230417074243-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=parav@nvidia.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=shahafs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox