Re: [RFC] alternative to conntrack ID

[Oscar Mechanic <oscar@ufomechanic.net>]

I was thinking about this like using a random number or multipler or
divider on the connection params. One thought, from ip_conntrack_max and
buckets you have an approx number of connections that is feasible to
pass e.g 32k. So the conntrack id goes from 0 --> 32k So if these were
to be looked at like slots e.g. if the ID goes over 32k start from the
bottom again and find an empty slot.

Quite simple suggestion probably eloquently displays that I don't know
what I am talking about.

This is not going to be unique for accounting and I don't think anything
you choose can assure that as we are dealing with a state machine 


On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 10:09 +0100, Amin Azez wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
> >Amin Azez wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>One of my uses for conntrack is for statistics and analysis and to
> >>reduce race conditions in taking actions on a particular conntrack.
> >>
> >>I need some kind of conntrack ID that will be consistent in the medium
> >>term accross different conntrack manipulations
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >That is why I've always argued in favour of the ID. Since its needed for
> >other reasons too, I suggest to just keep it and get on.
> >  
> >
> Err... the current problem is that the conntrack id _may_ be re-used 
> within milli-seconds?
> I was trying to find a safe conntrack id.
> 
> Amin