From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Marcus Sundberg <marcus@ingate.com>
Cc: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>,
Pablo Neira <pablo@eurodev.net>, Amin Azez <azez@ufomechanic.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] alternative to conntrack ID
Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 00:18:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <427D3EAF.3020200@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <427D26E7.8060701@ingate.com>
Marcus Sundberg wrote:
> You don't even need fast CPUs or networks to risk precision problems
> - think multiple NICs and SMP.
SMP or multiple NIcs don't matter because at any point in time only
one instance of a connection can exist. The challenge is to have a
unique identifier over time.
Regards
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-07 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-27 23:55 [RFC] [PATCH] ctnetlink updates Pablo Neira
2005-04-01 6:59 ` Harald Welte
2005-04-03 18:01 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-06 18:08 ` Pablo Neira
2005-04-17 15:07 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-29 7:14 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-04-29 8:02 ` Harald Welte
2005-05-04 9:18 ` [RFC] alternative to conntrack ID Amin Azez
2005-05-04 9:32 ` Patrick Schaaf
2005-05-04 11:30 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-05-04 12:01 ` Amin Azez
2005-05-06 15:16 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-05-07 20:36 ` Marcus Sundberg
2005-05-07 22:18 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2005-05-07 22:32 ` Marcus Sundberg
2005-05-09 14:17 ` KOVACS Krisztian
2005-05-09 15:08 ` Amin Azez
2005-05-10 6:49 ` Harald Welte
2005-05-17 16:12 ` Amin Azez
2005-05-17 20:17 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-05-18 7:24 ` Amin Azez
2005-05-18 9:30 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-04 23:52 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-05 1:02 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-06 8:48 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-09 12:52 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-09 13:00 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-09 13:34 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-10 10:21 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-13 7:41 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-14 2:30 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-14 2:42 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-15 2:41 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-20 16:04 ` Amin Azez
2005-06-20 16:12 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-22 9:09 ` Amin Azez
2005-06-22 9:30 ` Oscar Mechanic
2005-06-22 17:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-07-11 5:41 ` Harald Welte
2005-07-11 7:47 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-07-11 9:50 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-06 8:17 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-05-18 6:45 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-05-18 7:08 ` Amin Azez
2005-05-18 7:17 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-05-11 8:43 ` Amin Azez
2005-05-01 23:49 ` [RFC] [PATCH] ctnetlink updates Pablo Neira
2005-05-02 10:47 ` Harald Welte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=427D3EAF.3020200@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=azez@ufomechanic.net \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=marcus@ingate.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=pablo@eurodev.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.