From: Pablo Neira <pablo@eurodev.net>
To: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Cc: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] ctnetlink updates
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 01:49:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42756B12.4090705@eurodev.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504290904450.8609@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> Looking at the last changes, I think it'd be much more better to port
> ip_queue to nfnetlink than to reserve another netlink ID: the hooks in
> nfnetlink are already there. I know that'd create backward compatibility
> issues at the existing queue applications, though... :-(
I was playing around with an experimental port of ip_queue to
nf_queue/nfnetlink during xmas holidays, it is crap. So I probably start
it from scratch.
In this specific case where we can break third party applications, to
ensure backward compatibility, I think that we can keep both ip_queue
and nf_queue in kernel tree for quite some time.
--
Pablo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-01 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-27 23:55 [RFC] [PATCH] ctnetlink updates Pablo Neira
2005-04-01 6:59 ` Harald Welte
2005-04-03 18:01 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-06 18:08 ` Pablo Neira
2005-04-17 15:07 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-29 7:14 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-04-29 8:02 ` Harald Welte
2005-05-04 9:18 ` [RFC] alternative to conntrack ID Amin Azez
2005-05-04 9:32 ` Patrick Schaaf
2005-05-04 11:30 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-05-04 12:01 ` Amin Azez
2005-05-06 15:16 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-05-07 20:36 ` Marcus Sundberg
2005-05-07 22:18 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-05-07 22:32 ` Marcus Sundberg
2005-05-09 14:17 ` KOVACS Krisztian
2005-05-09 15:08 ` Amin Azez
2005-05-10 6:49 ` Harald Welte
2005-05-17 16:12 ` Amin Azez
2005-05-17 20:17 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-05-18 7:24 ` Amin Azez
2005-05-18 9:30 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-04 23:52 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-05 1:02 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-06 8:48 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-09 12:52 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-09 13:00 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-09 13:34 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-10 10:21 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-13 7:41 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-06-14 2:30 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-14 2:42 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-15 2:41 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-20 16:04 ` Amin Azez
2005-06-20 16:12 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-06-22 9:09 ` Amin Azez
2005-06-22 9:30 ` Oscar Mechanic
2005-06-22 17:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-07-11 5:41 ` Harald Welte
2005-07-11 7:47 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-07-11 9:50 ` Pablo Neira
2005-06-06 8:17 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-05-18 6:45 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-05-18 7:08 ` Amin Azez
2005-05-18 7:17 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-05-11 8:43 ` Amin Azez
2005-05-01 23:49 ` Pablo Neira [this message]
2005-05-02 10:47 ` [RFC] [PATCH] ctnetlink updates Harald Welte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42756B12.4090705@eurodev.net \
--to=pablo@eurodev.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.