From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <christoph.anton.mitterer@physik.uni-muenchen.de>
To: dm-crypt@saout.de
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] Efficacy of xts over 1TB
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:45:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1282423535.3276.24.camel@fermat.scientia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100816142139.GA26251@tansi.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 565 bytes --]
Hi.
But this goes IMO more in the plausible denyability direction, doesn't
it?
An attacker would still be not able to read what was written.
And for most applications it should be extremely difficult or even
impossible to make any conclusions,.. because of fragmentation... etc.
pp.
Another issue is of course when you have corrupted programs in the
system.... but then you're screwed anyway,... and there are usually much
easier to implement hidden channels.... (but this argument shouldn't
count as I always say myself ;) ).
Cheers,
Chris.
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3387 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-21 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-26 21:07 [dm-crypt] Efficacy of xts over 1TB Arno Wagner
2010-07-26 21:31 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-26 21:45 ` Arno Wagner
2010-07-26 21:42 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-26 22:55 ` Arno Wagner
2010-07-26 23:42 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2010-07-27 10:21 ` Arno Wagner
2010-08-15 17:26 ` Uwe Menges
2010-08-15 22:10 ` Arno Wagner
2010-08-16 11:44 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2010-08-16 12:39 ` Arno Wagner
2010-08-16 12:55 ` octane indice
2010-08-16 14:21 ` Arno Wagner
2010-08-21 20:45 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer [this message]
2010-08-21 23:14 ` Arno Wagner
2010-08-22 0:46 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-25 22:25 Ietf Nist
2010-07-25 22:41 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-22 14:57 David Santamaría Rogado
2010-07-25 10:34 ` Arno Wagner
2010-07-25 11:18 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-25 12:29 ` Heinz Diehl
2010-07-25 12:25 ` Milan Broz
2010-07-25 13:14 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-25 13:52 ` Milan Broz
2010-07-25 22:37 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-26 0:14 ` Milan Broz
2010-07-26 20:38 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-26 8:53 ` Arno Wagner
2010-07-26 20:47 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-26 21:01 ` Arno Wagner
2010-07-26 21:28 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-26 21:35 ` Arno Wagner
2010-07-25 22:52 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-26 9:42 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2010-07-26 18:09 ` Arno Wagner
2010-07-25 15:32 ` Arno Wagner
2010-07-25 22:48 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-25 23:42 ` Milan Broz
2010-07-26 18:35 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-25 15:28 ` Arno Wagner
2010-07-25 18:11 ` Milan Broz
2010-07-26 9:04 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2010-07-27 18:21 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-27 21:02 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2010-07-26 9:17 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2010-07-27 18:42 ` David Santamaría Rogado
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1282423535.3276.24.camel@fermat.scientia.net \
--to=christoph.anton.mitterer@physik.uni-muenchen.de \
--cc=dm-crypt@saout.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.