From: Arno Wagner <arno@wagner.name>
To: dm-crypt@saout.de
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] Efficacy of xts over 1TB
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:21:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100727102108.GA2373@tansi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <slrni4s7ac.lr8.Mario.Holbe@darkside.dyn.samba-tng.org>
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 01:42:01AM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> Christoph Anton Mitterer <christoph.anton.mitterer@physik.uni-muenchen.de> wrote:
> > I've just read some sections of the Standard... D4 and D6... it rather
> > seems that really the whole size (of the partition) is meant,... and not
>
> No, no, no, hell, no. They don't mean a size of a partition, or a disk
> or whatever. They talk about an amount of data because they mean exactly
> that: an amount of data encrypted using the same key.
>
> If you set up dm-crypt with aes-xts-plain on a 500G partition, fill it
> up with data, remove everything and fill it up again with other data you
> *did* encrypt 1TB of data using the same key despite the fact that your
> partition might only be 500G.
> Please feel free to re-proceed the exercise with a 250G partition.
>
> Of course, your attacker has to be able to capture a snapshot after the
> first fill-up ...
And that is the real limit in practice. This is more relevant for,
e.g., encrypting tape backups or other backups were a number
of generations is kept. If I understand this correctly, the
actual data exposure if you encrypt in the order of 2^(n/2)
bits, with n your block lenght, is very small, namely two blocks.
But I would need to check to be sure.
> probably via some forensic magic - people who believe
> in encryption often tend to also still believe in Peter Gutmann :)
Here I highly recomment the Epilogue, were Gutmann puts that into
perspective for modern drives: "...it's unlikely that anything
can be recovered from any recent drive except perhaps a single
level via basic error-cancelling techniques...". Also note that
nobody claims to sucessfully have done that and all major data
recovery outfits claim they cannot recover anything after a single
overwerwrite with zeros on modern drives. Also note that tape is very
different and Gutmann still applies there. (Original paper with
updates: http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/secure_del.html)
> regards
> Mario
> --
> If you think technology can solve your problems you don't understand
> technology and you don't understand your problems.
> -- Bruce Schneier
Nice quote!
Arno
--
Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email: arno@wagner.name
GnuPG: ID: 1E25338F FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C 0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F
----
Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans
If it's in the news, don't worry about it. The very definition of
"news" is "something that hardly ever happens." -- Bruce Schneier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-27 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-26 21:07 [dm-crypt] Efficacy of xts over 1TB Arno Wagner
2010-07-26 21:31 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-26 21:45 ` Arno Wagner
2010-07-26 21:42 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-26 22:55 ` Arno Wagner
2010-07-26 23:42 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2010-07-27 10:21 ` Arno Wagner [this message]
2010-08-15 17:26 ` Uwe Menges
2010-08-15 22:10 ` Arno Wagner
2010-08-16 11:44 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2010-08-16 12:39 ` Arno Wagner
2010-08-16 12:55 ` octane indice
2010-08-16 14:21 ` Arno Wagner
2010-08-21 20:45 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-08-21 23:14 ` Arno Wagner
2010-08-22 0:46 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-25 22:25 Ietf Nist
2010-07-25 22:41 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-22 14:57 David Santamaría Rogado
2010-07-25 10:34 ` Arno Wagner
2010-07-25 11:18 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-25 12:29 ` Heinz Diehl
2010-07-25 12:25 ` Milan Broz
2010-07-25 13:14 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-25 13:52 ` Milan Broz
2010-07-25 22:37 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-26 0:14 ` Milan Broz
2010-07-26 20:38 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-26 8:53 ` Arno Wagner
2010-07-26 20:47 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-26 21:01 ` Arno Wagner
2010-07-26 21:28 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-26 21:35 ` Arno Wagner
2010-07-25 22:52 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-26 9:42 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2010-07-26 18:09 ` Arno Wagner
2010-07-25 15:32 ` Arno Wagner
2010-07-25 22:48 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-25 23:42 ` Milan Broz
2010-07-26 18:35 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-25 15:28 ` Arno Wagner
2010-07-25 18:11 ` Milan Broz
2010-07-26 9:04 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2010-07-27 18:21 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-07-27 21:02 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2010-07-26 9:17 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2010-07-27 18:42 ` David Santamaría Rogado
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100727102108.GA2373@tansi.org \
--to=arno@wagner.name \
--cc=dm-crypt@saout.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.