From: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, snitzer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] dm: update workqueue usages
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:19:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1292329171.30045.2.camel@o> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1292181055-25696-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 20:10 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Tejun,
what's the rational behind dropping create_singlethread_workqueue() in
favor of alloc_ordered_workqueue(...WQ_MEM_RECLAIM..) which are
semantically identical?
Heinz
>
> This patchset updates workqueue usages in dm and contains the
> following six patches.
>
> 0001-dm-stripe-drop-kstriped.patch
> 0002-dm-snap-kill-unused-dm_snapshot-queued_bios_work-and.patch
> 0003-dm-snap-convert-to-alloc-_ordered-_workqueue.patch
> 0004-dm-don-t-use-flush_scheduled_work.patch
> 0005-dm-use-non-reentrant-workqueues-if-equivalent.patch
> 0006-dm-snap-persistent-make-metadata_wq-multithreaded.patch
>
> 0001-0002 drop unnecessary workqueues. 0003-0004 conver to the new
> APIs. 0005-0006 relax ordering requirement of some workqueues.
>
> All patches in this series shouldn't introduce any noticeable
> difference in work execution ordering. I stayed away from more
> difficult ones like...
>
> * Can the workqueues converted by 0005 be multithreaded instead of
> non-reentrant?
>
> * Does dm-mpath::kmpath_handlerd need WQ_RESCUER? I suspect not but
> not sure. If not, it can be dropped and system_wq or kmultipathd
> can be used instead. Another curious thing here is that while
> activate_path work is queued to kmpath_handlerd, deactivate_path is
> queued to kmultipathd. Is this intentional? If so, it might be a
> good idea to comment why it's done that way as it's a bit confusing.
>
> * I'm pretty sure workqueues in dm-crypt would benefit from using
> multithreaded workqueue but people already seem to be working on it
> so I left it alone.
>
> This patchset is on top of 2.6.37-rc5 (6313e3c2). If it needs to be
> against a different tree, please let me know. The patches are also
> available in the following git tree.
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq.git update-dm
>
> and contains the following changes. Thanks.
>
> drivers/md/dm-crypt.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/md/dm-delay.c | 2 +-
> drivers/md/dm-kcopyd.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/md/dm-mpath.c | 7 ++++---
> drivers/md/dm-raid1.c | 5 +++--
> drivers/md/dm-snap-persistent.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/md/dm-snap.c | 38 --------------------------------------
> drivers/md/dm-stripe.c | 25 ++++++-------------------
> drivers/md/dm.c | 3 ++-
> 9 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
>
> --
> tejun
>
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-14 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-12 19:10 [PATCHSET] dm: update workqueue usages Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 19:10 ` [PATCH 1/6] dm-stripe: drop kstriped Tejun Heo
2010-12-14 23:59 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-12-15 1:34 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-07 23:02 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2011-01-08 17:16 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 19:10 ` [PATCH 2/6] dm-snap: kill unused dm_snapshot->queued_bios_work and ksnapd Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 19:10 ` [PATCH 3/6] dm-snap: convert to alloc[_ordered]_workqueue() Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 19:10 ` [PATCH 4/6] dm: don't use flush_scheduled_work() Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 19:10 ` [PATCH 5/6] dm: use non-reentrant workqueues if equivalent Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 19:10 ` [PATCH 6/6] dm-snap-persistent: make metadata_wq multithreaded Tejun Heo
2011-01-08 3:31 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-12-12 21:23 ` [PATCHSET] dm: update workqueue usages Milan Broz
2010-12-14 15:49 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-14 16:03 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-12-14 16:05 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-20 14:14 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-12-20 16:03 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-14 12:19 ` Heinz Mauelshagen [this message]
2010-12-14 13:16 ` [PATCHSET] " Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1292329171.30045.2.camel@o \
--to=heinzm@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.