From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: dm: update workqueue usages
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:03:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101214160324.GB7944@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D079205.3010204@kernel.org>
On Tue, Dec 14 2010 at 10:49am -0500,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> On 12/12/2010 10:23 PM, Milan Broz wrote:
> > On 12/12/2010 08:10 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >
> >> * I'm pretty sure workqueues in dm-crypt would benefit from using
> >> multithreaded workqueue but people already seem to be working on it
> >> so I left it alone.
> >
> > Yes, FYI it is already here with new queue api:
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/agk/patches/2.6/editing/dm-crypt-scale-to-multiple-CPUs.patch
>
> Yeah, that looks much better.
>
> > (So that one chunk for dm-crypt in patch 3/6 can be dropped.)
>
> I'll regenerate the series w/o the chunk. BTW, against which tree
> should it be generated?
I'll be reviewing your workqueue patches today. I can take care of
rebasing the patches as needed ontop of Alasdair's quilt tree (up to
dm-raid1-support-discard.patch):
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/agk/patches/2.6/editing/series
Once I've folded your patches in I will share the url for resulting
quilt tree.
Thanks,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-14 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-12 19:10 [PATCHSET] dm: update workqueue usages Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 19:10 ` [PATCH 1/6] dm-stripe: drop kstriped Tejun Heo
2010-12-14 23:59 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-12-15 1:34 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-07 23:02 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2011-01-08 17:16 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 19:10 ` [PATCH 2/6] dm-snap: kill unused dm_snapshot->queued_bios_work and ksnapd Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 19:10 ` [PATCH 3/6] dm-snap: convert to alloc[_ordered]_workqueue() Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 19:10 ` [PATCH 4/6] dm: don't use flush_scheduled_work() Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 19:10 ` [PATCH 5/6] dm: use non-reentrant workqueues if equivalent Tejun Heo
2010-12-12 19:10 ` [PATCH 6/6] dm-snap-persistent: make metadata_wq multithreaded Tejun Heo
2011-01-08 3:31 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-12-12 21:23 ` [PATCHSET] dm: update workqueue usages Milan Broz
2010-12-14 15:49 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-14 16:03 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2010-12-14 16:05 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-20 14:14 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-12-20 16:03 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-14 12:19 ` [PATCHSET] " Heinz Mauelshagen
2010-12-14 13:16 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101214160324.GB7944@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=mbroz@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.