All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: shuo.liu@freescale.com
Cc: Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	scottwood@freescale.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	leoli@freescale.com, dwmw2@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtd/nand : workaround for Freescale FCM to support large-page Nand chip
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 08:47:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1323067628.2316.29.camel@koala> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322973098-2528-3-git-send-email-shuo.liu@freescale.com>

On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 12:31 +0800, shuo.liu@freescale.com wrote:
> +		/*
> +		 * Freescale FCM controller has a 2K size limitation of buffer
> +		 * RAM, so elbc_fcm_ctrl->buffer have to be used if writesize
> +		 * of chip is greater than 2048.
> +		 * We malloc a large enough buffer (maximum page size is 16K).
> +		 */
> +		elbc_fcm_ctrl->buffer = kmalloc(1024 * 16 + 1024, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!elbc_fcm_ctrl->buffer) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate memory\n");
> +			mutex_unlock(&fsl_elbc_nand_mutex);
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto err;
> +		}

Sorry for returning to this again and agian - I do not have time to dig
suggest you the right solutions on the one hand, you do not provide me a
good answer on the other hand (or I forgot?).

16KiB pages do not even exist I believe. And you kmalloc 33KiB or RAM
although in most cases you need only 5KiB. I think this is wrong - what
is the very strong reason of wasting RAM you have?

Why you cannot allocate exactly the required amount of RAM after
'nand_scan_ident()' finishes and you know the page size?

Artem.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: shuo.liu@freescale.com
Cc: Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	scottwood@freescale.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	dwmw2@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtd/nand : workaround for Freescale FCM to support large-page Nand chip
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 08:47:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1323067628.2316.29.camel@koala> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322973098-2528-3-git-send-email-shuo.liu@freescale.com>

On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 12:31 +0800, shuo.liu@freescale.com wrote:
> +		/*
> +		 * Freescale FCM controller has a 2K size limitation of buffer
> +		 * RAM, so elbc_fcm_ctrl->buffer have to be used if writesize
> +		 * of chip is greater than 2048.
> +		 * We malloc a large enough buffer (maximum page size is 16K).
> +		 */
> +		elbc_fcm_ctrl->buffer = kmalloc(1024 * 16 + 1024, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!elbc_fcm_ctrl->buffer) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate memory\n");
> +			mutex_unlock(&fsl_elbc_nand_mutex);
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto err;
> +		}

Sorry for returning to this again and agian - I do not have time to dig
suggest you the right solutions on the one hand, you do not provide me a
good answer on the other hand (or I forgot?).

16KiB pages do not even exist I believe. And you kmalloc 33KiB or RAM
although in most cases you need only 5KiB. I think this is wrong - what
is the very strong reason of wasting RAM you have?

Why you cannot allocate exactly the required amount of RAM after
'nand_scan_ident()' finishes and you know the page size?

Artem.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: shuo.liu@freescale.com
Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com,
	scottwood@freescale.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, leoli@freescale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtd/nand : workaround for Freescale FCM to support large-page Nand chip
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 08:47:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1323067628.2316.29.camel@koala> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322973098-2528-3-git-send-email-shuo.liu@freescale.com>

On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 12:31 +0800, shuo.liu@freescale.com wrote:
> +		/*
> +		 * Freescale FCM controller has a 2K size limitation of buffer
> +		 * RAM, so elbc_fcm_ctrl->buffer have to be used if writesize
> +		 * of chip is greater than 2048.
> +		 * We malloc a large enough buffer (maximum page size is 16K).
> +		 */
> +		elbc_fcm_ctrl->buffer = kmalloc(1024 * 16 + 1024, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!elbc_fcm_ctrl->buffer) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate memory\n");
> +			mutex_unlock(&fsl_elbc_nand_mutex);
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto err;
> +		}

Sorry for returning to this again and agian - I do not have time to dig
suggest you the right solutions on the one hand, you do not provide me a
good answer on the other hand (or I forgot?).

16KiB pages do not even exist I believe. And you kmalloc 33KiB or RAM
although in most cases you need only 5KiB. I think this is wrong - what
is the very strong reason of wasting RAM you have?

Why you cannot allocate exactly the required amount of RAM after
'nand_scan_ident()' finishes and you know the page size?

Artem.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-05  6:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-04  4:31 [PATCH 1/3] mtd/nand : use elbc_fcm_ctrl->oob to set FPAR_MS bit of FPAR shuo.liu
2011-12-04  4:31 ` shuo.liu
2011-12-04  4:31 ` shuo.liu
2011-12-04  4:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] mtd/nand : set correct length to FBCR for a non-full-page write shuo.liu
2011-12-04  4:31   ` shuo.liu
2011-12-04  4:31   ` shuo.liu
2011-12-04  4:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] mtd/nand : workaround for Freescale FCM to support large-page Nand chip shuo.liu
2011-12-04  4:31   ` shuo.liu
2011-12-04  4:31   ` shuo.liu
2011-12-05  6:47   ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2011-12-05  6:47     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-05  6:47     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-05 19:46     ` Scott Wood
2011-12-05 19:46       ` Scott Wood
2011-12-06 11:49       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-06 11:49         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-06 11:49   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-06 11:49     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-06 11:49     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-07  0:09   ` Scott Wood
2011-12-07  0:09     ` Scott Wood
2011-12-07  0:09     ` Scott Wood
2011-12-07  3:55     ` LiuShuo
2011-12-07  3:55       ` LiuShuo
2011-12-07  3:55       ` LiuShuo
2011-12-07 19:11       ` Scott Wood
2011-12-07 19:11         ` Scott Wood
2011-12-07 19:11         ` Scott Wood
2011-12-08 10:44         ` LiuShuo
2011-12-08 10:44           ` LiuShuo
2011-12-08 10:44           ` LiuShuo
2011-12-08 18:43           ` Scott Wood
2011-12-08 18:43             ` Scott Wood
2011-12-08 18:43             ` Scott Wood
2011-12-12 21:09     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-12 21:09       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-12 21:09       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-12 21:15       ` Scott Wood
2011-12-12 21:15         ` Scott Wood
2011-12-12 21:15         ` Scott Wood
2011-12-12 21:19         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-12 21:19           ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-12 21:19           ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-12 21:30           ` Scott Wood
2011-12-12 21:30             ` Scott Wood
2011-12-12 21:30             ` Scott Wood
2011-12-13  2:46             ` LiuShuo
2011-12-13  2:46               ` LiuShuo
2011-12-13  2:46               ` LiuShuo
2011-12-14  8:41               ` LiuShuo
2011-12-14  8:41                 ` LiuShuo
2011-12-14  8:41                 ` LiuShuo
2011-12-14 20:15                 ` Scott Wood
2011-12-14 20:15                   ` Scott Wood
2011-12-14 20:15                   ` Scott Wood
2011-12-15  4:59                   ` Li Yang
2011-12-15  4:59                     ` Li Yang
2011-12-15  4:59                     ` Li Yang
2011-12-15 17:32                     ` Scott Wood
2011-12-15 17:32                       ` Scott Wood
2011-12-16  2:44                   ` LiuShuo
2011-12-16  2:44                     ` LiuShuo
2011-12-16  2:44                     ` LiuShuo
2011-12-16 17:59                     ` Scott Wood
2011-12-16 17:59                       ` Scott Wood
2011-12-16 17:59                       ` Scott Wood
2011-12-19 11:05                       ` Li Yang
2011-12-19 11:05                         ` Li Yang
2011-12-19 11:05                         ` Li Yang
2011-12-19 16:47                         ` Scott Wood
2011-12-19 16:47                           ` Scott Wood
2011-12-20  9:08                           ` Li Yang
2011-12-20  9:08                             ` Li Yang
2011-12-20  9:08                             ` Li Yang
2011-12-20 19:48                             ` Scott Wood
2011-12-20 19:48                               ` Scott Wood
2011-12-17 14:35             ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-17 14:35               ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-17 14:35               ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-19 18:38               ` Scott Wood
2011-12-19 18:38                 ` Scott Wood
2011-12-19 18:38                 ` Scott Wood
2011-12-19 18:42                 ` Scott Wood
2011-12-19 18:42                   ` Scott Wood
2011-12-14  3:41       ` LiuShuo
2011-12-14  3:41         ` LiuShuo
2011-12-14  3:41         ` LiuShuo
2011-12-14 20:53         ` Scott Wood
2011-12-14 20:53           ` Scott Wood
2011-12-14 20:53           ` Scott Wood
2011-12-05  6:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] mtd/nand : use elbc_fcm_ctrl->oob to set FPAR_MS bit of FPAR Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-05  6:50   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-12-05  6:50   ` Artem Bityutskiy
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-11-24  0:41 b35362
2011-11-24  0:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] mtd/nand : workaround for Freescale FCM to support large-page Nand chip b35362
2011-11-24  0:41   ` b35362
2011-11-24  0:41   ` b35362
2011-11-24  7:37   ` Li Yang-R58472
2011-11-24  7:37     ` Li Yang-R58472
2011-11-24  7:37     ` Li Yang-R58472
2011-11-28 17:20     ` Scott Wood
2011-11-28 17:20       ` Scott Wood
2011-11-24  7:41   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-11-24  7:41     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-11-24  7:41     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-11-24  7:49     ` Li Yang-R58472
2011-11-24  7:49       ` Li Yang-R58472
2011-11-24  7:49       ` Li Yang-R58472
2011-11-24  8:16       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-11-24  8:16         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-11-24 10:02         ` LiuShuo
2011-11-24 10:02           ` LiuShuo
2011-11-24 10:02           ` LiuShuo
2011-11-24 11:07           ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-11-24 11:07             ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-11-28 21:48   ` Scott Wood
2011-11-28 21:48     ` Scott Wood
2011-11-28 21:48     ` Scott Wood
2011-11-28 21:49     ` Scott Wood
2011-11-28 21:49       ` Scott Wood
2011-11-28 21:49       ` Scott Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1323067628.2316.29.camel@koala \
    --to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=leoli@freescale.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=shuo.liu@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.