From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcareata@freescale.com>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, agraf@suse.de,
mihai.caraman@freescale.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/kvm: Convert openpic lock to raw_spinlock
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 16:43:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1424731420.4698.13.camel@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424251955-308-2-git-send-email-bogdan.purcareata@freescale.com>
On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 09:32 +0000, Bogdan Purcareata wrote:
> This patch enables running intensive I/O workloads, e.g. netperf, in a guest
> deployed on a RT host. It also enable guests to be SMP.
>
> The openpic spinlock becomes a sleeping mutex on a RT system. This no longer
> guarantees that EPR is atomic with exception delivery. The guest VCPU thread
> fails due to a BUG_ON(preemptible()) when running netperf.
>
> In order to make the kvmppc_mpic_set_epr() call safe on RT from non-atomic
> context, convert the openpic lock to a raw_spinlock. A similar approach can
> be seen for x86 platforms in the following commit [1].
>
> Here are some comparative cyclitest measurements run inside a high priority RT
> guest run on a RT host. The guest has 1 VCPU and the test has been run for 15
> minutes. The guest runs ~750 hackbench processes as background stress.
>
> spinlock raw_spinlock
> Min latency (us) 4 4
> Avg latency (us) 15 19
> Max latency (us) 70 62
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/11/289
>
> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcareata@freescale.com>
> Reviewed-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Where did that Reviewed-by: come from?
A +1 in Gerrit on an internal tree does not translate into an upstream
Reviewed-by.
-Scott
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcareata@freescale.com>
Cc: <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
<bigeasy@linutronix.de>, <agraf@suse.de>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <mihai.caraman@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/kvm: Convert openpic lock to raw_spinlock
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 16:43:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1424731420.4698.13.camel@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424251955-308-2-git-send-email-bogdan.purcareata@freescale.com>
On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 09:32 +0000, Bogdan Purcareata wrote:
> This patch enables running intensive I/O workloads, e.g. netperf, in a guest
> deployed on a RT host. It also enable guests to be SMP.
>
> The openpic spinlock becomes a sleeping mutex on a RT system. This no longer
> guarantees that EPR is atomic with exception delivery. The guest VCPU thread
> fails due to a BUG_ON(preemptible()) when running netperf.
>
> In order to make the kvmppc_mpic_set_epr() call safe on RT from non-atomic
> context, convert the openpic lock to a raw_spinlock. A similar approach can
> be seen for x86 platforms in the following commit [1].
>
> Here are some comparative cyclitest measurements run inside a high priority RT
> guest run on a RT host. The guest has 1 VCPU and the test has been run for 15
> minutes. The guest runs ~750 hackbench processes as background stress.
>
> spinlock raw_spinlock
> Min latency (us) 4 4
> Avg latency (us) 15 19
> Max latency (us) 70 62
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/11/289
>
> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcareata@freescale.com>
> Reviewed-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Where did that Reviewed-by: come from?
A +1 in Gerrit on an internal tree does not translate into an upstream
Reviewed-by.
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-23 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-18 9:32 [PATCH 0/2] powerpc/kvm: Enable running guests on RT Linux Bogdan Purcareata
2015-02-18 9:32 ` Bogdan Purcareata
2015-02-18 9:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/kvm: Convert openpic lock to raw_spinlock Bogdan Purcareata
2015-02-18 9:32 ` Bogdan Purcareata
2015-02-23 22:43 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2015-02-23 22:43 ` Scott Wood
2015-02-18 9:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/kvm: Limit MAX_VCPUS for guests running on RT Linux Bogdan Purcareata
2015-02-18 9:32 ` Bogdan Purcareata
2015-02-18 9:36 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-18 9:36 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-20 13:45 ` Alexander Graf
2015-02-20 13:45 ` Alexander Graf
2015-02-23 22:48 ` Scott Wood
2015-02-23 22:48 ` Scott Wood
2015-02-20 13:45 ` [PATCH 0/2] powerpc/kvm: Enable running guests " Alexander Graf
2015-02-20 13:45 ` Alexander Graf
2015-02-20 14:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-20 14:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-20 14:16 ` Alexander Graf
2015-02-20 14:16 ` Alexander Graf
2015-02-20 14:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-20 14:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-20 14:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-20 14:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-20 15:06 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-20 15:06 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-20 15:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-20 15:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-20 15:17 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-20 15:17 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-23 8:12 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-02-23 8:12 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-02-23 7:50 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-02-23 7:50 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-02-23 7:29 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-02-23 7:29 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-02-23 23:27 ` Scott Wood
2015-02-23 23:27 ` Scott Wood
2015-02-23 23:27 ` Scott Wood
2015-02-25 16:36 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-25 16:36 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-26 13:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-26 13:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-26 13:31 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-26 13:31 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-27 1:05 ` Scott Wood
2015-02-27 1:05 ` Scott Wood
2015-02-27 13:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-27 13:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-27 17:07 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-03-27 17:07 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-02 23:11 ` Scott Wood
2015-04-02 23:11 ` Scott Wood
2015-04-03 8:07 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-03 8:07 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-03 21:26 ` Scott Wood
2015-04-03 21:26 ` Scott Wood
2015-04-09 7:44 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-09 7:44 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-09 7:44 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-09 23:53 ` Scott Wood
2015-04-09 23:53 ` Scott Wood
2015-04-20 10:53 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-20 10:53 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-21 0:52 ` Scott Wood
2015-04-21 0:52 ` Scott Wood
2015-04-22 12:06 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-22 12:06 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-22 12:06 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-23 0:30 ` Scott Wood
2015-04-23 0:30 ` Scott Wood
2015-04-23 12:31 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-23 12:31 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-23 12:31 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-23 21:26 ` Scott Wood
2015-04-23 21:26 ` Scott Wood
2015-04-27 6:45 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-27 6:45 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-27 6:45 ` Purcareata Bogdan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1424731420.4698.13.camel@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bogdan.purcareata@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mihai.caraman@freescale.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.