From: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com (James Bottomley)
Subject: complete boot failure in 4.5-rc1 caused by nvme: make SG_IO support optional
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 08:04:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454861040.2329.4.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160207092241.GA15331@lst.de>
On Sun, 2016-02-07@10:22 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Keith said it should be on by default, and I promised him to change
> it once we run into problems, which I guess this counts as.
>
> But just curious: what distro are you using? Upstream systemd
> explicitly rejected using scsi_id for NVMe here:
>
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/1453
>
> and all my test systems don't do this either.
This was SUSE (in my case, openSUSE Leap). I just checked the source
package; they patch the by-id rules back in for NVME:
# PATCH-FIX-SUSE 1101-rules-persistent-device-names-for-NVMe-devices.patch (bsc#944132)
Patch1101: 1101-rules-persistent-device-names-for-NVMe-devices.patch
The bugzilla is giving access denied for bug id 944132, so it's likely
some proprietary vendor problem. The patch has no preamble, so it's
hard to tell what they were thinking.
James
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: complete boot failure in 4.5-rc1 caused by nvme: make SG_IO support optional
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 08:04:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454861040.2329.4.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160207092241.GA15331@lst.de>
On Sun, 2016-02-07 at 10:22 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Keith said it should be on by default, and I promised him to change
> it once we run into problems, which I guess this counts as.
>
> But just curious: what distro are you using? Upstream systemd
> explicitly rejected using scsi_id for NVMe here:
>
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/1453
>
> and all my test systems don't do this either.
This was SUSE (in my case, openSUSE Leap). I just checked the source
package; they patch the by-id rules back in for NVME:
# PATCH-FIX-SUSE 1101-rules-persistent-device-names-for-NVMe-devices.patch (bsc#944132)
Patch1101: 1101-rules-persistent-device-names-for-NVMe-devices.patch
The bugzilla is giving access denied for bug id 944132, so it's likely
some proprietary vendor problem. The patch has no preamble, so it's
hard to tell what they were thinking.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-07 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-06 18:33 complete boot failure in 4.5-rc1 caused by nvme: make SG_IO support optional James Bottomley
2016-02-06 18:33 ` James Bottomley
2016-02-07 9:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-07 9:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-07 16:04 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2016-02-07 16:04 ` James Bottomley
2016-02-07 22:28 ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-07 22:28 ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-07 23:07 ` James Bottomley
2016-02-07 23:07 ` James Bottomley
2016-02-08 7:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08 7:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08 7:32 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-08 7:32 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-08 10:01 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-08 10:01 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-08 10:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08 10:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08 15:12 ` Keith Busch
2016-02-08 15:12 ` Keith Busch
2016-02-08 15:19 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-08 15:19 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-08 16:15 ` Keith Busch
2016-02-08 16:15 ` Keith Busch
2016-02-08 15:23 ` James Bottomley
2016-02-08 15:23 ` James Bottomley
2016-02-09 12:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-09 12:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-09 13:29 ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-09 13:29 ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-09 17:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-09 17:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-09 17:14 ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-09 17:14 ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-09 17:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-09 17:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-09 17:19 ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-09 17:19 ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-09 15:37 ` James Bottomley
2016-02-09 15:37 ` James Bottomley
2016-02-08 7:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-08 7:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-08 7:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1454861040.2329.4.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.