All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hare@suse.de (Hannes Reinecke)
Subject: complete boot failure in 4.5-rc1 caused by nvme: make SG_IO support optional
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:19:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B8B1F1.4070605@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160208151258.GB25111@localhost.localdomain>

On 02/08/2016 04:12 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016@11:13:50AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016@12:01:16PM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>>>
>>>> Do we have defined sysfs attributes for NVMe devices nowadays?
>>>
>>> /sys/block/nvme0n1/uuid
>>
>> That's only supported for NVMe 1.1 and higher devices, and optional.
>> For older or stupid devices we need to support the algorithm based
>> on the serial attribute from nvme_fill_device_id_scsi_string() in
>> drivers/nvme/host/scsi.c.
> 
> It's even worse. NGUID was defined for 1.2 devices and higher. 1.1
> devices should have EUI-64 at:
>  
>   /sys/block/nvmeXnY/eui
> 
> 1.2 devices will have either uuid or eui (or both).
> 
> The majority of devices in circulation today are 1.0, and need to concat
> these three entries to make a unique identifier:
> 
>   /sys/block/nvmeXnY/device/serial
>   /sys/block/nvmeXnY/device/model
>   /sys/block/nvmeXnY/nsid

Ok, so what about having a 'wwid' attribute which provides combined
information (like scsi has)?

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		   Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare at suse.de			               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg
GF: F. Imend?rffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: complete boot failure in 4.5-rc1 caused by nvme: make SG_IO support optional
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:19:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B8B1F1.4070605@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160208151258.GB25111@localhost.localdomain>

On 02/08/2016 04:12 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 11:13:50AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 12:01:16PM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>>>
>>>> Do we have defined sysfs attributes for NVMe devices nowadays?
>>>
>>> /sys/block/nvme0n1/uuid
>>
>> That's only supported for NVMe 1.1 and higher devices, and optional.
>> For older or stupid devices we need to support the algorithm based
>> on the serial attribute from nvme_fill_device_id_scsi_string() in
>> drivers/nvme/host/scsi.c.
> 
> It's even worse. NGUID was defined for 1.2 devices and higher. 1.1
> devices should have EUI-64 at:
>  
>   /sys/block/nvmeXnY/eui
> 
> 1.2 devices will have either uuid or eui (or both).
> 
> The majority of devices in circulation today are 1.0, and need to concat
> these three entries to make a unique identifier:
> 
>   /sys/block/nvmeXnY/device/serial
>   /sys/block/nvmeXnY/device/model
>   /sys/block/nvmeXnY/nsid

Ok, so what about having a 'wwid' attribute which provides combined
information (like scsi has)?

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		   Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@suse.de			               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-08 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-06 18:33 complete boot failure in 4.5-rc1 caused by nvme: make SG_IO support optional James Bottomley
2016-02-06 18:33 ` James Bottomley
2016-02-07  9:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-07  9:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-07 16:04   ` James Bottomley
2016-02-07 16:04     ` James Bottomley
2016-02-07 22:28     ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-07 22:28       ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-07 23:07       ` James Bottomley
2016-02-07 23:07         ` James Bottomley
2016-02-08  7:24         ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08  7:24           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08  7:32         ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-08  7:32           ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-08 10:01           ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-08 10:01             ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-02-08 10:13             ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08 10:13               ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08 15:12               ` Keith Busch
2016-02-08 15:12                 ` Keith Busch
2016-02-08 15:19                 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2016-02-08 15:19                   ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-08 16:15                   ` Keith Busch
2016-02-08 16:15                     ` Keith Busch
2016-02-08 15:23           ` James Bottomley
2016-02-08 15:23             ` James Bottomley
2016-02-09 12:50       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-09 12:50         ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-09 13:29         ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-09 13:29           ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-09 17:12           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-09 17:12             ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-09 17:14             ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-09 17:14               ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-09 17:19               ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-09 17:19                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-09 17:19                 ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-09 17:19                   ` Jens Axboe
2016-02-09 15:37         ` James Bottomley
2016-02-09 15:37           ` James Bottomley
2016-02-08  7:26     ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-08  7:26       ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-02-08  7:26       ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56B8B1F1.4070605@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.