All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	drinkcat@chromium.org, louis.kuo@mediatek.com,
	srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	shengnan.wang@mediatek.com, tfiga@chromium.org,
	bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, sj.huang@mediatek.com,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com, sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, bingbu.cao@intel.com, mchehab@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [V7, 2/2] media: i2c: dw9768: Add DW9768 VCM driver
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2020 14:19:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1591424358.8804.599.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200605124643.GG2428291@smile.fi.intel.com>

Hi Andy,

Thanks for the review. My replies are as below.

On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 15:46 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 06:54:12PM +0800, Dongchun Zhu wrote:
> > Add a V4L2 sub-device driver for DW9768 voice coil motor, providing
> > control to set the desired focus via IIC serial interface.
> 
> ...
> 
> > +config VIDEO_DW9768
> > +	tristate "DW9768 lens voice coil support"
> > +	depends on I2C && VIDEO_V4L2
> 
> No compile test?
> 

Sorry?
Kconfig here is based on the current media tree master branch.
It is also what the other similar drivers from Dongwoon do. 

> > +	depends on PM
> 
> This is very strange dependency for ordinary driver.
> 

Thanks for the reminder.
This would be removed in next release.
As dw9768_runtime_resume/suspend would be called if runtime PM is
disabled.

> > +	select MEDIA_CONTROLLER
> > +	select VIDEO_V4L2_SUBDEV_API
> > +	select V4L2_FWNODE
> 
> ...
> 
> > +/*
> > + * DW9768 requires waiting time (delay time) of t_OPR after power-up,
> > + * or in the case of PD reset taking place.
> > + */
> > +#define DW9768_T_OPR_US				1000
> > +#define DW9768_Tvib_MS_BASE10			(64 - 1)
> > +#define DW9768_AAC_MODE_DEFAULT			2
> 
> > +#define DW9768_AAC_TIME_DEFAULT			0x20
> 
> Hex? Why not decimal?
> 

There is one optional property 'dongwoon,aac-timing' defined in DT.
I don't know whether you have noticed that.

'DW9768_AAC_TIME_DEFAULT' is the value set to AACT[5:0] register.
I thought the Hex unit should be proper as it is directly written to the
Hex register.

> > +#define DW9768_CLOCK_PRE_SCALE_DEFAULT		1
> 
> ...
> 
> > +static int dw9768_mod_reg(struct dw9768 *dw9768, u8 reg, u8 mask, u8 val)
> > +{
> > +	struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(&dw9768->sd);
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, reg);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> 
> > +	val = ((unsigned char)ret & ~mask) | (val & mask);
> 
> This cast is weird.
> 

Thanks for the review, but this cast is using classical pattern from
your suggestion on OV02A10 v5:
https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/59788/

So I wonder whether it is still required to be refined currently.
Or what would it be supposed to do for the cast?

> > +
> > +	return i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, reg, val);
> > +}
> 
> ...
> 
> > +			dev_err(&client->dev, "%s I2C failure: %d",
> > +				__func__, ret);
> 
> One line?
> 

Splitting the sentence into two lines or not should both be okay.
Of course, I could put them in one line in next release.

> ...
> 
> > +static int dw9768_release(struct dw9768 *dw9768)
> > +{
> > +	struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(&dw9768->sd);
> > +	u32 move_delay_us = dw9768_cal_move_delay(dw9768->aac_mode,
> > +						  dw9768->clock_presc,
> > +						  dw9768->aac_timing) / 100;
> > +	int ret, val;
> > +
> > +	val = round_down(dw9768->focus->val, DW9768_MOVE_STEPS);
> > +	for ( ; val >= 0; val -= DW9768_MOVE_STEPS) {
> > +		ret = dw9768_set_dac(dw9768, val);
> > +		if (ret) {
> > +			dev_err(&client->dev, "I2C write fail: %d", ret);
> > +			return ret;
> > +		}
> > +		usleep_range(move_delay_us, move_delay_us + 1000);
> > +	}
> 
> 
> It will look more naturally in the multiplier kind of value.
> 
> 	unsigned int steps = DIV_ROUND_UP(...);
> 
> 	while (steps--) {
> 		...(..., steps * ..._MOVE_STEPS);
> 		...
> 	}
> 
> but double check arithmetics.
> 

The current coding style is actually updated with reference to your
previous comments on DW9768 v3:
https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/61856/

> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> 
> 
> Also it seems we need to have writex_poll_timeout() implementation (see
> iopoll.h).
> 

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	drinkcat@chromium.org, louis.kuo@mediatek.com,
	srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	shengnan.wang@mediatek.com, tfiga@chromium.org,
	bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, sj.huang@mediatek.com,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com, sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, bingbu.cao@intel.com, mchehab@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [V7, 2/2] media: i2c: dw9768: Add DW9768 VCM driver
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2020 14:19:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1591424358.8804.599.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200605124643.GG2428291@smile.fi.intel.com>

Hi Andy,

Thanks for the review. My replies are as below.

On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 15:46 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 06:54:12PM +0800, Dongchun Zhu wrote:
> > Add a V4L2 sub-device driver for DW9768 voice coil motor, providing
> > control to set the desired focus via IIC serial interface.
> 
> ...
> 
> > +config VIDEO_DW9768
> > +	tristate "DW9768 lens voice coil support"
> > +	depends on I2C && VIDEO_V4L2
> 
> No compile test?
> 

Sorry?
Kconfig here is based on the current media tree master branch.
It is also what the other similar drivers from Dongwoon do. 

> > +	depends on PM
> 
> This is very strange dependency for ordinary driver.
> 

Thanks for the reminder.
This would be removed in next release.
As dw9768_runtime_resume/suspend would be called if runtime PM is
disabled.

> > +	select MEDIA_CONTROLLER
> > +	select VIDEO_V4L2_SUBDEV_API
> > +	select V4L2_FWNODE
> 
> ...
> 
> > +/*
> > + * DW9768 requires waiting time (delay time) of t_OPR after power-up,
> > + * or in the case of PD reset taking place.
> > + */
> > +#define DW9768_T_OPR_US				1000
> > +#define DW9768_Tvib_MS_BASE10			(64 - 1)
> > +#define DW9768_AAC_MODE_DEFAULT			2
> 
> > +#define DW9768_AAC_TIME_DEFAULT			0x20
> 
> Hex? Why not decimal?
> 

There is one optional property 'dongwoon,aac-timing' defined in DT.
I don't know whether you have noticed that.

'DW9768_AAC_TIME_DEFAULT' is the value set to AACT[5:0] register.
I thought the Hex unit should be proper as it is directly written to the
Hex register.

> > +#define DW9768_CLOCK_PRE_SCALE_DEFAULT		1
> 
> ...
> 
> > +static int dw9768_mod_reg(struct dw9768 *dw9768, u8 reg, u8 mask, u8 val)
> > +{
> > +	struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(&dw9768->sd);
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, reg);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> 
> > +	val = ((unsigned char)ret & ~mask) | (val & mask);
> 
> This cast is weird.
> 

Thanks for the review, but this cast is using classical pattern from
your suggestion on OV02A10 v5:
https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/59788/

So I wonder whether it is still required to be refined currently.
Or what would it be supposed to do for the cast?

> > +
> > +	return i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, reg, val);
> > +}
> 
> ...
> 
> > +			dev_err(&client->dev, "%s I2C failure: %d",
> > +				__func__, ret);
> 
> One line?
> 

Splitting the sentence into two lines or not should both be okay.
Of course, I could put them in one line in next release.

> ...
> 
> > +static int dw9768_release(struct dw9768 *dw9768)
> > +{
> > +	struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(&dw9768->sd);
> > +	u32 move_delay_us = dw9768_cal_move_delay(dw9768->aac_mode,
> > +						  dw9768->clock_presc,
> > +						  dw9768->aac_timing) / 100;
> > +	int ret, val;
> > +
> > +	val = round_down(dw9768->focus->val, DW9768_MOVE_STEPS);
> > +	for ( ; val >= 0; val -= DW9768_MOVE_STEPS) {
> > +		ret = dw9768_set_dac(dw9768, val);
> > +		if (ret) {
> > +			dev_err(&client->dev, "I2C write fail: %d", ret);
> > +			return ret;
> > +		}
> > +		usleep_range(move_delay_us, move_delay_us + 1000);
> > +	}
> 
> 
> It will look more naturally in the multiplier kind of value.
> 
> 	unsigned int steps = DIV_ROUND_UP(...);
> 
> 	while (steps--) {
> 		...(..., steps * ..._MOVE_STEPS);
> 		...
> 	}
> 
> but double check arithmetics.
> 

The current coding style is actually updated with reference to your
previous comments on DW9768 v3:
https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/61856/

> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> 
> 
> Also it seems we need to have writex_poll_timeout() implementation (see
> iopoll.h).
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	<mchehab@kernel.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	<mark.rutland@arm.com>, <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
	<drinkcat@chromium.org>, <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <bingbu.cao@intel.com>,
	<srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <sj.huang@mediatek.com>,
	<linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<louis.kuo@mediatek.com>, <shengnan.wang@mediatek.com>,
	<dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [V7, 2/2] media: i2c: dw9768: Add DW9768 VCM driver
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2020 14:19:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1591424358.8804.599.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200605124643.GG2428291@smile.fi.intel.com>

Hi Andy,

Thanks for the review. My replies are as below.

On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 15:46 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 06:54:12PM +0800, Dongchun Zhu wrote:
> > Add a V4L2 sub-device driver for DW9768 voice coil motor, providing
> > control to set the desired focus via IIC serial interface.
> 
> ...
> 
> > +config VIDEO_DW9768
> > +	tristate "DW9768 lens voice coil support"
> > +	depends on I2C && VIDEO_V4L2
> 
> No compile test?
> 

Sorry?
Kconfig here is based on the current media tree master branch.
It is also what the other similar drivers from Dongwoon do. 

> > +	depends on PM
> 
> This is very strange dependency for ordinary driver.
> 

Thanks for the reminder.
This would be removed in next release.
As dw9768_runtime_resume/suspend would be called if runtime PM is
disabled.

> > +	select MEDIA_CONTROLLER
> > +	select VIDEO_V4L2_SUBDEV_API
> > +	select V4L2_FWNODE
> 
> ...
> 
> > +/*
> > + * DW9768 requires waiting time (delay time) of t_OPR after power-up,
> > + * or in the case of PD reset taking place.
> > + */
> > +#define DW9768_T_OPR_US				1000
> > +#define DW9768_Tvib_MS_BASE10			(64 - 1)
> > +#define DW9768_AAC_MODE_DEFAULT			2
> 
> > +#define DW9768_AAC_TIME_DEFAULT			0x20
> 
> Hex? Why not decimal?
> 

There is one optional property 'dongwoon,aac-timing' defined in DT.
I don't know whether you have noticed that.

'DW9768_AAC_TIME_DEFAULT' is the value set to AACT[5:0] register.
I thought the Hex unit should be proper as it is directly written to the
Hex register.

> > +#define DW9768_CLOCK_PRE_SCALE_DEFAULT		1
> 
> ...
> 
> > +static int dw9768_mod_reg(struct dw9768 *dw9768, u8 reg, u8 mask, u8 val)
> > +{
> > +	struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(&dw9768->sd);
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, reg);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> 
> > +	val = ((unsigned char)ret & ~mask) | (val & mask);
> 
> This cast is weird.
> 

Thanks for the review, but this cast is using classical pattern from
your suggestion on OV02A10 v5:
https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/59788/

So I wonder whether it is still required to be refined currently.
Or what would it be supposed to do for the cast?

> > +
> > +	return i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, reg, val);
> > +}
> 
> ...
> 
> > +			dev_err(&client->dev, "%s I2C failure: %d",
> > +				__func__, ret);
> 
> One line?
> 

Splitting the sentence into two lines or not should both be okay.
Of course, I could put them in one line in next release.

> ...
> 
> > +static int dw9768_release(struct dw9768 *dw9768)
> > +{
> > +	struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(&dw9768->sd);
> > +	u32 move_delay_us = dw9768_cal_move_delay(dw9768->aac_mode,
> > +						  dw9768->clock_presc,
> > +						  dw9768->aac_timing) / 100;
> > +	int ret, val;
> > +
> > +	val = round_down(dw9768->focus->val, DW9768_MOVE_STEPS);
> > +	for ( ; val >= 0; val -= DW9768_MOVE_STEPS) {
> > +		ret = dw9768_set_dac(dw9768, val);
> > +		if (ret) {
> > +			dev_err(&client->dev, "I2C write fail: %d", ret);
> > +			return ret;
> > +		}
> > +		usleep_range(move_delay_us, move_delay_us + 1000);
> > +	}
> 
> 
> It will look more naturally in the multiplier kind of value.
> 
> 	unsigned int steps = DIV_ROUND_UP(...);
> 
> 	while (steps--) {
> 		...(..., steps * ..._MOVE_STEPS);
> 		...
> 	}
> 
> but double check arithmetics.
> 

The current coding style is actually updated with reference to your
previous comments on DW9768 v3:
https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/61856/

> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> 
> 
> Also it seems we need to have writex_poll_timeout() implementation (see
> iopoll.h).
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-06  6:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-05 10:54 [V7, 0/2] media: i2c: Add support for DW9768 VCM driver Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-05 10:54 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-05 10:54 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-05 10:54 ` [V7, 1/2] media: dt-bindings: media: i2c: Document DW9768 bindings Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-05 10:54   ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-05 10:54   ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-09 19:47   ` Rob Herring
2020-06-09 19:47     ` Rob Herring
2020-06-09 19:47     ` Rob Herring
2020-06-05 10:54 ` [V7, 2/2] media: i2c: dw9768: Add DW9768 VCM driver Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-05 10:54   ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-05 10:54   ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-05 12:14   ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-05 12:14     ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-05 12:14     ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-05 13:02     ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-05 13:02       ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-05 13:02       ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-05 13:37       ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-05 13:37         ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-05 13:37         ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-06  6:24     ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-06  6:24       ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-06  6:24       ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-05 12:46   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 12:46     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 12:46     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 13:10     ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-05 13:10       ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-05 13:10       ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-06  6:19     ` Dongchun Zhu [this message]
2020-06-06  6:19       ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-06  6:19       ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-08 13:27       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-08 13:27         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-08 13:27         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-09  3:45         ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-09  3:45           ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-09  3:45           ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-09 11:14           ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-09 11:14             ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-09 11:14             ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-10 12:58             ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-10 12:58               ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-10 12:58               ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-05 13:44   ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-05 13:44     ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-05 13:44     ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-06  6:42     ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-06  6:42       ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-06  6:42       ` Dongchun Zhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1591424358.8804.599.camel@mhfsdcap03 \
    --to=dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=bingbu.cao@intel.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=louis.kuo@mediatek.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=shengnan.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=sj.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.