All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
To: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, drinkcat@chromium.org,
	andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	shengnan.wang@mediatek.com, louis.kuo@mediatek.com,
	bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, sj.huang@mediatek.com,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
	bingbu.cao@intel.com, mchehab@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [V7, 2/2] media: i2c: dw9768: Add DW9768 VCM driver
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:44:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200605134440.GA20379@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200605105412.18813-3-dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>

Hi Dongchun,

On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 06:54:12PM +0800, Dongchun Zhu wrote:
> Add a V4L2 sub-device driver for DW9768 voice coil motor, providing
> control to set the desired focus via IIC serial interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS                |   1 +
>  drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig  |  13 ++
>  drivers/media/i2c/Makefile |   1 +
>  drivers/media/i2c/dw9768.c | 566 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 581 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/media/i2c/dw9768.c
> 

Thank you for the patch. Please see my comments inline.

[snip]
> +/*
> + * DW9768 requires waiting time (delay time) of t_OPR after power-up,
> + * or in the case of PD reset taking place.
> + */
> +#define DW9768_T_OPR_US				1000
> +#define DW9768_Tvib_MS_BASE10			(64 - 1)

Kernel macro names are uppercase only.

[snip]
> +	/* Set AAC Timing */
> +	if (dw9768->aac_timing != DW9768_AAC_TIME_DEFAULT) {
> +		ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, DW9768_AAC_TIME_REG,
> +						dw9768->aac_timing);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	move_delay_us = dw9768_cal_move_delay(dw9768->aac_mode,
> +					      dw9768->clock_presc,
> +					      dw9768->aac_timing) / 100;

We could calculate this once in probe() and store the ready us value in
the dw9768 struct.

> +
> +	for (val = dw9768->focus->val % DW9768_MOVE_STEPS;
> +	     val <= dw9768->focus->val;
> +	     val += DW9768_MOVE_STEPS) {
> +		ret = dw9768_set_dac(dw9768, val);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(&client->dev, "%s I2C failure: %d",
> +				__func__, ret);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +		usleep_range(move_delay_us, move_delay_us + 1000);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
[snip]
> +	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> +	if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev)) {
> +		ret = dw9768_runtime_resume(dev);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to power on: %d\n", ret);
> +			goto err_clean_entity;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = v4l2_async_register_subdev(&dw9768->sd);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to register V4L2 subdev: %d", ret);
> +		goto error_async_register;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +error_async_register:

The recommendation is to name the labels after the clean-up task that needs
to be done. Should this one be called error_power_off?

> +	if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev))
> +		dw9768_runtime_suspend(dev);

Shouldn't we also call pm_runtime_disable() here?

> +err_clean_entity:
> +	media_entity_cleanup(&dw9768->sd.entity);
> +err_free_handler:
> +	v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&dw9768->ctrls);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int dw9768_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> +	struct v4l2_subdev *sd = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +	struct dw9768 *dw9768 = sd_to_dw9768(sd);
> +
> +	v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(&dw9768->sd);
> +	v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&dw9768->ctrls);
> +	media_entity_cleanup(&dw9768->sd.entity);
> +	pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
> +	if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&client->dev))

pm_runtime_status_suspended() doesn't consider the runtime PM disable
state. There is also pm_runtime_suspended() and that should be correct
here.

Best regards,
Tomasz

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
To: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, drinkcat@chromium.org,
	andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	shengnan.wang@mediatek.com, louis.kuo@mediatek.com,
	bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, sj.huang@mediatek.com,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
	bingbu.cao@intel.com, mchehab@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [V7, 2/2] media: i2c: dw9768: Add DW9768 VCM driver
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:44:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200605134440.GA20379@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200605105412.18813-3-dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>

Hi Dongchun,

On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 06:54:12PM +0800, Dongchun Zhu wrote:
> Add a V4L2 sub-device driver for DW9768 voice coil motor, providing
> control to set the desired focus via IIC serial interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS                |   1 +
>  drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig  |  13 ++
>  drivers/media/i2c/Makefile |   1 +
>  drivers/media/i2c/dw9768.c | 566 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 581 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/media/i2c/dw9768.c
> 

Thank you for the patch. Please see my comments inline.

[snip]
> +/*
> + * DW9768 requires waiting time (delay time) of t_OPR after power-up,
> + * or in the case of PD reset taking place.
> + */
> +#define DW9768_T_OPR_US				1000
> +#define DW9768_Tvib_MS_BASE10			(64 - 1)

Kernel macro names are uppercase only.

[snip]
> +	/* Set AAC Timing */
> +	if (dw9768->aac_timing != DW9768_AAC_TIME_DEFAULT) {
> +		ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, DW9768_AAC_TIME_REG,
> +						dw9768->aac_timing);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	move_delay_us = dw9768_cal_move_delay(dw9768->aac_mode,
> +					      dw9768->clock_presc,
> +					      dw9768->aac_timing) / 100;

We could calculate this once in probe() and store the ready us value in
the dw9768 struct.

> +
> +	for (val = dw9768->focus->val % DW9768_MOVE_STEPS;
> +	     val <= dw9768->focus->val;
> +	     val += DW9768_MOVE_STEPS) {
> +		ret = dw9768_set_dac(dw9768, val);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(&client->dev, "%s I2C failure: %d",
> +				__func__, ret);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +		usleep_range(move_delay_us, move_delay_us + 1000);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
[snip]
> +	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> +	if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev)) {
> +		ret = dw9768_runtime_resume(dev);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to power on: %d\n", ret);
> +			goto err_clean_entity;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = v4l2_async_register_subdev(&dw9768->sd);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to register V4L2 subdev: %d", ret);
> +		goto error_async_register;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +error_async_register:

The recommendation is to name the labels after the clean-up task that needs
to be done. Should this one be called error_power_off?

> +	if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev))
> +		dw9768_runtime_suspend(dev);

Shouldn't we also call pm_runtime_disable() here?

> +err_clean_entity:
> +	media_entity_cleanup(&dw9768->sd.entity);
> +err_free_handler:
> +	v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&dw9768->ctrls);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int dw9768_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> +	struct v4l2_subdev *sd = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +	struct dw9768 *dw9768 = sd_to_dw9768(sd);
> +
> +	v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(&dw9768->sd);
> +	v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&dw9768->ctrls);
> +	media_entity_cleanup(&dw9768->sd.entity);
> +	pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
> +	if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&client->dev))

pm_runtime_status_suspended() doesn't consider the runtime PM disable
state. There is also pm_runtime_suspended() and that should be correct
here.

Best regards,
Tomasz

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
To: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, bgolaszewski@baylibre.com,
	mchehab@kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, drinkcat@chromium.org,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, bingbu.cao@intel.com,
	srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sj.huang@mediatek.com,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	louis.kuo@mediatek.com, shengnan.wang@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [V7, 2/2] media: i2c: dw9768: Add DW9768 VCM driver
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:44:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200605134440.GA20379@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200605105412.18813-3-dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>

Hi Dongchun,

On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 06:54:12PM +0800, Dongchun Zhu wrote:
> Add a V4L2 sub-device driver for DW9768 voice coil motor, providing
> control to set the desired focus via IIC serial interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS                |   1 +
>  drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig  |  13 ++
>  drivers/media/i2c/Makefile |   1 +
>  drivers/media/i2c/dw9768.c | 566 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 581 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/media/i2c/dw9768.c
> 

Thank you for the patch. Please see my comments inline.

[snip]
> +/*
> + * DW9768 requires waiting time (delay time) of t_OPR after power-up,
> + * or in the case of PD reset taking place.
> + */
> +#define DW9768_T_OPR_US				1000
> +#define DW9768_Tvib_MS_BASE10			(64 - 1)

Kernel macro names are uppercase only.

[snip]
> +	/* Set AAC Timing */
> +	if (dw9768->aac_timing != DW9768_AAC_TIME_DEFAULT) {
> +		ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, DW9768_AAC_TIME_REG,
> +						dw9768->aac_timing);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	move_delay_us = dw9768_cal_move_delay(dw9768->aac_mode,
> +					      dw9768->clock_presc,
> +					      dw9768->aac_timing) / 100;

We could calculate this once in probe() and store the ready us value in
the dw9768 struct.

> +
> +	for (val = dw9768->focus->val % DW9768_MOVE_STEPS;
> +	     val <= dw9768->focus->val;
> +	     val += DW9768_MOVE_STEPS) {
> +		ret = dw9768_set_dac(dw9768, val);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(&client->dev, "%s I2C failure: %d",
> +				__func__, ret);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +		usleep_range(move_delay_us, move_delay_us + 1000);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
[snip]
> +	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> +	if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev)) {
> +		ret = dw9768_runtime_resume(dev);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to power on: %d\n", ret);
> +			goto err_clean_entity;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = v4l2_async_register_subdev(&dw9768->sd);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to register V4L2 subdev: %d", ret);
> +		goto error_async_register;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +error_async_register:

The recommendation is to name the labels after the clean-up task that needs
to be done. Should this one be called error_power_off?

> +	if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev))
> +		dw9768_runtime_suspend(dev);

Shouldn't we also call pm_runtime_disable() here?

> +err_clean_entity:
> +	media_entity_cleanup(&dw9768->sd.entity);
> +err_free_handler:
> +	v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&dw9768->ctrls);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int dw9768_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> +	struct v4l2_subdev *sd = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +	struct dw9768 *dw9768 = sd_to_dw9768(sd);
> +
> +	v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(&dw9768->sd);
> +	v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&dw9768->ctrls);
> +	media_entity_cleanup(&dw9768->sd.entity);
> +	pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
> +	if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&client->dev))

pm_runtime_status_suspended() doesn't consider the runtime PM disable
state. There is also pm_runtime_suspended() and that should be correct
here.

Best regards,
Tomasz

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-05 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-05 10:54 [V7, 0/2] media: i2c: Add support for DW9768 VCM driver Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-05 10:54 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-05 10:54 ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-05 10:54 ` [V7, 1/2] media: dt-bindings: media: i2c: Document DW9768 bindings Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-05 10:54   ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-05 10:54   ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-09 19:47   ` Rob Herring
2020-06-09 19:47     ` Rob Herring
2020-06-09 19:47     ` Rob Herring
2020-06-05 10:54 ` [V7, 2/2] media: i2c: dw9768: Add DW9768 VCM driver Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-05 10:54   ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-05 10:54   ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-05 12:14   ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-05 12:14     ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-05 12:14     ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-05 13:02     ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-05 13:02       ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-05 13:02       ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-05 13:37       ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-05 13:37         ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-05 13:37         ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-06  6:24     ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-06  6:24       ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-06  6:24       ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-05 12:46   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 12:46     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 12:46     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-05 13:10     ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-05 13:10       ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-05 13:10       ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-06  6:19     ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-06  6:19       ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-06  6:19       ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-08 13:27       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-08 13:27         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-08 13:27         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-09  3:45         ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-09  3:45           ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-09  3:45           ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-09 11:14           ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-09 11:14             ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-09 11:14             ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-10 12:58             ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-10 12:58               ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-10 12:58               ` Sakari Ailus
2020-06-05 13:44   ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2020-06-05 13:44     ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-05 13:44     ` Tomasz Figa
2020-06-06  6:42     ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-06  6:42       ` Dongchun Zhu
2020-06-06  6:42       ` Dongchun Zhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200605134440.GA20379@chromium.org \
    --to=tfiga@chromium.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=bingbu.cao@intel.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=louis.kuo@mediatek.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=shengnan.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=sj.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.