All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com>
To: corbet@lwn.net, zohar@linux.ibm.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	serge@hallyn.com, tytso@mit.edu, ebiggers@kernel.org,
	axboe@kernel.dk, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org,
	eparis@redhat.com, paul@paul-moore.com
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, audit@vger.kernel.org,
	roberto.sassu@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v11 09/19] ipe: add permissive toggle
Date: Wed,  4 Oct 2023 15:09:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1696457386-3010-10-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1696457386-3010-1-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com>

From: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>

IPE, like SELinux, supports a permissive mode. This mode allows policy
authors to test and evaluate IPE policy without it effecting their
programs. When the mode is changed, a 1404 AUDIT_MAC_STATUS
be reported.

This patch adds the following audit records:

    audit: MAC_STATUS enforcing=0 old_enforcing=1 auid=4294967295
      ses=4294967295 enabled=1 old-enabled=1 lsm=ipe res=1
    audit: MAC_STATUS enforcing=1 old_enforcing=0 auid=4294967295
      ses=4294967295 enabled=1 old-enabled=1 lsm=ipe res=1

The audit record only emit when the value from the user input is
different from the current enforce value.

Signed-off-by: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com>

---
v2:
  + Split evaluation loop, access control hooks,
    and evaluation loop from policy parser and userspace
    interface to pass mailing list character limit

v3:
  + Move ipe_load_properties to patch 04.
  + Remove useless 0-initializations
  + Prefix extern variables with ipe_
  + Remove kernel module parameters, as these are
    exposed through sysctls.
  + Add more prose to the IPE base config option
    help text.
  + Use GFP_KERNEL for audit_log_start.
  + Remove unnecessary caching system.
  + Remove comments from headers
  + Use rcu_access_pointer for rcu-pointer null check
  + Remove usage of reqprot; use prot only.
  + Move policy load and activation audit event to 03/12

v4:
  + Remove sysctls in favor of securityfs nodes
  + Re-add kernel module parameters, as these are now
    exposed through securityfs.
  + Refactor property audit loop to a separate function.

v5:
  + fix minor grammatical errors
  + do not group rule by curly-brace in audit record,
    reconstruct the exact rule.

v6:
  + No changes

v7:
  + Further split lsm creation into a separate commit from the
    evaluation loop and audit system, for easier review.
  + Propagating changes to support the new ipe_context structure in the
    evaluation loop.
  + Split out permissive functionality into a separate patch for easier
    review.
  + Remove permissive switch compile-time configuration option - this
    is trivial to add later.

v8:
  + Remove "IPE" prefix from permissive audit record
  + align fields to the linux-audit field dictionary. This causes the
    following fields to change:
      enforce -> permissive

  + Remove duplicated information correlated with syscall record, that
    will always be present in the audit event.
  + Change audit types:
    + AUDIT_TRUST_STATUS -> AUDIT_MAC_STATUS
      + There is no significant difference in meaning between
        these types.

v9:
  + Clean up ipe_context related code

v10:
  + Change audit format to comform with the existing format selinux is
    using
  + Remove the audit record emission during init to align with selinux,
    which does not perform this action.

v11:
  + Remove redundant code
---
 security/ipe/audit.c | 22 ++++++++++++++
 security/ipe/audit.h |  1 +
 security/ipe/eval.c  | 14 +++++++--
 security/ipe/eval.h  |  1 +
 security/ipe/fs.c    | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/ipe/audit.c b/security/ipe/audit.c
index e123701d5e3b..0dd5f10c318f 100644
--- a/security/ipe/audit.c
+++ b/security/ipe/audit.c
@@ -193,3 +193,25 @@ void ipe_audit_policy_load(const struct ipe_policy *const p)
 
 	audit_log_end(ab);
 }
+
+/**
+ * ipe_audit_enforce - Audit a change in IPE's enforcement state.
+ * @new_enforce: The new value enforce to be set.
+ * @old_enforce: The old value currently in enforce.
+ */
+void ipe_audit_enforce(bool new_enforce, bool old_enforce)
+{
+	struct audit_buffer *ab;
+
+	ab = audit_log_start(audit_context(), GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_MAC_STATUS);
+	if (!ab)
+		return;
+
+	audit_log_format(ab, "enforcing=%d old_enforcing=%d auid=%u ses=%u"
+			 " enabled=1 old-enabled=1 lsm=ipe res=1",
+			 new_enforce, old_enforce,
+			 from_kuid(&init_user_ns, audit_get_loginuid(current)),
+			 audit_get_sessionid(current));
+
+	audit_log_end(ab);
+}
diff --git a/security/ipe/audit.h b/security/ipe/audit.h
index 0ff5a06808de..914f001e5286 100644
--- a/security/ipe/audit.h
+++ b/security/ipe/audit.h
@@ -14,5 +14,6 @@ void ipe_audit_match(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx,
 void ipe_audit_policy_load(const struct ipe_policy *const p);
 void ipe_audit_policy_activation(const struct ipe_policy *const op,
 				 const struct ipe_policy *const np);
+void ipe_audit_enforce(bool new_enforce, bool old_enforce);
 
 #endif /* _IPE_AUDIT_H */
diff --git a/security/ipe/eval.c b/security/ipe/eval.c
index 499b6b3338f2..78c54ff1fdd3 100644
--- a/security/ipe/eval.c
+++ b/security/ipe/eval.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 
 struct ipe_policy __rcu *ipe_active_policy;
 bool success_audit;
+bool enforce = true;
 
 static const struct super_block *pinned_sb;
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pin_lock);
@@ -114,12 +115,14 @@ static bool evaluate_property(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx,
 int ipe_evaluate_event(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx)
 {
 	bool match = false;
+	bool enforcing = true;
 	enum ipe_action_type action;
 	enum ipe_match match_type;
 	struct ipe_policy *pol = NULL;
 	const struct ipe_rule *rule = NULL;
 	const struct ipe_op_table *rules = NULL;
 	struct ipe_prop *prop = NULL;
+	int rc = 0;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 
@@ -129,6 +132,8 @@ int ipe_evaluate_event(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
+	enforcing = READ_ONCE(enforce);
+
 	if (ctx->op == IPE_OP_INVALID) {
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 		action = pol->parsed->global_default_action;
@@ -167,9 +172,12 @@ int ipe_evaluate_event(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx)
 	ipe_audit_match(ctx, match_type, action, rule);
 
 	if (action == IPE_ACTION_DENY)
-		return -EACCES;
+		rc = -EACCES;
+
+	if (!enforcing)
+		rc = 0;
 
-	return 0;
+	return rc;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -198,3 +206,5 @@ void ipe_invalidate_pinned_sb(const struct super_block *mnt_sb)
 
 module_param(success_audit, bool, 0400);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(success_audit, "Start IPE with success auditing enabled");
+module_param(enforce, bool, 0400);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(enforce, "Start IPE in enforce or permissive mode");
diff --git a/security/ipe/eval.h b/security/ipe/eval.h
index 5473f712566c..3f7f71452618 100644
--- a/security/ipe/eval.h
+++ b/security/ipe/eval.h
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 
 extern struct ipe_policy __rcu *ipe_active_policy;
 extern bool success_audit;
+extern bool enforce;
 
 struct ipe_eval_ctx {
 	enum ipe_op_type op;
diff --git a/security/ipe/fs.c b/security/ipe/fs.c
index dda7a5afc60c..0a1838432bd0 100644
--- a/security/ipe/fs.c
+++ b/security/ipe/fs.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ static struct dentry *np __ro_after_init;
 static struct dentry *root __ro_after_init;
 struct dentry *policy_root __ro_after_init;
 static struct dentry *audit_node __ro_after_init;
+static struct dentry *enforce_node __ro_after_init;
 
 /**
  * setaudit - Write handler for the securityfs node, "ipe/success_audit"
@@ -67,6 +68,60 @@ static ssize_t getaudit(struct file *f, char __user *data,
 	return simple_read_from_buffer(data, len, offset, result, 1);
 }
 
+/**
+ * setenforce - Write handler for the securityfs node, "ipe/enforce"
+ * @f: Supplies a file structure representing the securityfs node.
+ * @data: Supplies a buffer passed to the write syscall.
+ * @len: Supplies the length of @data.
+ * @offset: unused.
+ *
+ * Return:
+ * * >0	- Success, Length of buffer written
+ * * <0	- Error
+ */
+static ssize_t setenforce(struct file *f, const char __user *data,
+			  size_t len, loff_t *offset)
+{
+	int rc = 0;
+	bool new_value, old_value;
+
+	if (!file_ns_capable(f, &init_user_ns, CAP_MAC_ADMIN))
+		return -EPERM;
+
+	old_value = READ_ONCE(enforce);
+	rc = kstrtobool_from_user(data, len, &new_value);
+	if (rc)
+		return rc;
+
+	if (new_value != old_value) {
+		ipe_audit_enforce(new_value, old_value);
+		WRITE_ONCE(enforce, new_value);
+	}
+
+	return len;
+}
+
+/**
+ * getenforce - Read handler for the securityfs node, "ipe/enforce"
+ * @f: Supplies a file structure representing the securityfs node.
+ * @data: Supplies a buffer passed to the read syscall.
+ * @len: Supplies the length of @data.
+ * @offset: unused.
+ *
+ * Return:
+ * * >0	- Success, Length of buffer written
+ * * <0	- Error
+ */
+static ssize_t getenforce(struct file *f, char __user *data,
+			  size_t len, loff_t *offset)
+{
+	const char *result;
+
+	result = ((READ_ONCE(enforce)) ? "1" : "0");
+
+	return simple_read_from_buffer(data, len, offset, result, 1);
+}
+
 /**
  * new_policy - Write handler for the securityfs node, "ipe/new_policy".
  * @f: Supplies a file structure representing the securityfs node.
@@ -120,6 +175,11 @@ static const struct file_operations audit_fops = {
 	.read = getaudit,
 };
 
+static const struct file_operations enforce_fops = {
+	.write = setenforce,
+	.read = getenforce,
+};
+
 /**
  * ipe_init_securityfs - Initialize IPE's securityfs tree at fsinit.
  *
@@ -147,6 +207,13 @@ static int __init ipe_init_securityfs(void)
 		goto err;
 	}
 
+	enforce_node = securityfs_create_file("enforce", 0600, root, NULL,
+					      &enforce_fops);
+	if (IS_ERR(enforce_node)) {
+		rc = PTR_ERR(enforce_node);
+		goto err;
+	}
+
 	policy_root = securityfs_create_dir("policies", root);
 	if (IS_ERR(policy_root)) {
 		rc = PTR_ERR(policy_root);
@@ -163,6 +230,7 @@ static int __init ipe_init_securityfs(void)
 err:
 	securityfs_remove(np);
 	securityfs_remove(policy_root);
+	securityfs_remove(enforce_node);
 	securityfs_remove(audit_node);
 	securityfs_remove(root);
 	return rc;
-- 
2.25.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com>
To: corbet@lwn.net, zohar@linux.ibm.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	serge@hallyn.com, tytso@mit.edu, ebiggers@kernel.org,
	axboe@kernel.dk, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org,
	eparis@redhat.com, paul@paul-moore.com
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>,
	roberto.sassu@huawei.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	audit@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
	Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com>,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH v11 09/19] ipe: add permissive toggle
Date: Wed,  4 Oct 2023 15:09:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1696457386-3010-10-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1696457386-3010-1-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com>

From: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>

IPE, like SELinux, supports a permissive mode. This mode allows policy
authors to test and evaluate IPE policy without it effecting their
programs. When the mode is changed, a 1404 AUDIT_MAC_STATUS
be reported.

This patch adds the following audit records:

    audit: MAC_STATUS enforcing=0 old_enforcing=1 auid=4294967295
      ses=4294967295 enabled=1 old-enabled=1 lsm=ipe res=1
    audit: MAC_STATUS enforcing=1 old_enforcing=0 auid=4294967295
      ses=4294967295 enabled=1 old-enabled=1 lsm=ipe res=1

The audit record only emit when the value from the user input is
different from the current enforce value.

Signed-off-by: Deven Bowers <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Fan Wu <wufan@linux.microsoft.com>

---
v2:
  + Split evaluation loop, access control hooks,
    and evaluation loop from policy parser and userspace
    interface to pass mailing list character limit

v3:
  + Move ipe_load_properties to patch 04.
  + Remove useless 0-initializations
  + Prefix extern variables with ipe_
  + Remove kernel module parameters, as these are
    exposed through sysctls.
  + Add more prose to the IPE base config option
    help text.
  + Use GFP_KERNEL for audit_log_start.
  + Remove unnecessary caching system.
  + Remove comments from headers
  + Use rcu_access_pointer for rcu-pointer null check
  + Remove usage of reqprot; use prot only.
  + Move policy load and activation audit event to 03/12

v4:
  + Remove sysctls in favor of securityfs nodes
  + Re-add kernel module parameters, as these are now
    exposed through securityfs.
  + Refactor property audit loop to a separate function.

v5:
  + fix minor grammatical errors
  + do not group rule by curly-brace in audit record,
    reconstruct the exact rule.

v6:
  + No changes

v7:
  + Further split lsm creation into a separate commit from the
    evaluation loop and audit system, for easier review.
  + Propagating changes to support the new ipe_context structure in the
    evaluation loop.
  + Split out permissive functionality into a separate patch for easier
    review.
  + Remove permissive switch compile-time configuration option - this
    is trivial to add later.

v8:
  + Remove "IPE" prefix from permissive audit record
  + align fields to the linux-audit field dictionary. This causes the
    following fields to change:
      enforce -> permissive

  + Remove duplicated information correlated with syscall record, that
    will always be present in the audit event.
  + Change audit types:
    + AUDIT_TRUST_STATUS -> AUDIT_MAC_STATUS
      + There is no significant difference in meaning between
        these types.

v9:
  + Clean up ipe_context related code

v10:
  + Change audit format to comform with the existing format selinux is
    using
  + Remove the audit record emission during init to align with selinux,
    which does not perform this action.

v11:
  + Remove redundant code
---
 security/ipe/audit.c | 22 ++++++++++++++
 security/ipe/audit.h |  1 +
 security/ipe/eval.c  | 14 +++++++--
 security/ipe/eval.h  |  1 +
 security/ipe/fs.c    | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/ipe/audit.c b/security/ipe/audit.c
index e123701d5e3b..0dd5f10c318f 100644
--- a/security/ipe/audit.c
+++ b/security/ipe/audit.c
@@ -193,3 +193,25 @@ void ipe_audit_policy_load(const struct ipe_policy *const p)
 
 	audit_log_end(ab);
 }
+
+/**
+ * ipe_audit_enforce - Audit a change in IPE's enforcement state.
+ * @new_enforce: The new value enforce to be set.
+ * @old_enforce: The old value currently in enforce.
+ */
+void ipe_audit_enforce(bool new_enforce, bool old_enforce)
+{
+	struct audit_buffer *ab;
+
+	ab = audit_log_start(audit_context(), GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_MAC_STATUS);
+	if (!ab)
+		return;
+
+	audit_log_format(ab, "enforcing=%d old_enforcing=%d auid=%u ses=%u"
+			 " enabled=1 old-enabled=1 lsm=ipe res=1",
+			 new_enforce, old_enforce,
+			 from_kuid(&init_user_ns, audit_get_loginuid(current)),
+			 audit_get_sessionid(current));
+
+	audit_log_end(ab);
+}
diff --git a/security/ipe/audit.h b/security/ipe/audit.h
index 0ff5a06808de..914f001e5286 100644
--- a/security/ipe/audit.h
+++ b/security/ipe/audit.h
@@ -14,5 +14,6 @@ void ipe_audit_match(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx,
 void ipe_audit_policy_load(const struct ipe_policy *const p);
 void ipe_audit_policy_activation(const struct ipe_policy *const op,
 				 const struct ipe_policy *const np);
+void ipe_audit_enforce(bool new_enforce, bool old_enforce);
 
 #endif /* _IPE_AUDIT_H */
diff --git a/security/ipe/eval.c b/security/ipe/eval.c
index 499b6b3338f2..78c54ff1fdd3 100644
--- a/security/ipe/eval.c
+++ b/security/ipe/eval.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 
 struct ipe_policy __rcu *ipe_active_policy;
 bool success_audit;
+bool enforce = true;
 
 static const struct super_block *pinned_sb;
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pin_lock);
@@ -114,12 +115,14 @@ static bool evaluate_property(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx,
 int ipe_evaluate_event(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx)
 {
 	bool match = false;
+	bool enforcing = true;
 	enum ipe_action_type action;
 	enum ipe_match match_type;
 	struct ipe_policy *pol = NULL;
 	const struct ipe_rule *rule = NULL;
 	const struct ipe_op_table *rules = NULL;
 	struct ipe_prop *prop = NULL;
+	int rc = 0;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 
@@ -129,6 +132,8 @@ int ipe_evaluate_event(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
+	enforcing = READ_ONCE(enforce);
+
 	if (ctx->op == IPE_OP_INVALID) {
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 		action = pol->parsed->global_default_action;
@@ -167,9 +172,12 @@ int ipe_evaluate_event(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx)
 	ipe_audit_match(ctx, match_type, action, rule);
 
 	if (action == IPE_ACTION_DENY)
-		return -EACCES;
+		rc = -EACCES;
+
+	if (!enforcing)
+		rc = 0;
 
-	return 0;
+	return rc;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -198,3 +206,5 @@ void ipe_invalidate_pinned_sb(const struct super_block *mnt_sb)
 
 module_param(success_audit, bool, 0400);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(success_audit, "Start IPE with success auditing enabled");
+module_param(enforce, bool, 0400);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(enforce, "Start IPE in enforce or permissive mode");
diff --git a/security/ipe/eval.h b/security/ipe/eval.h
index 5473f712566c..3f7f71452618 100644
--- a/security/ipe/eval.h
+++ b/security/ipe/eval.h
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 
 extern struct ipe_policy __rcu *ipe_active_policy;
 extern bool success_audit;
+extern bool enforce;
 
 struct ipe_eval_ctx {
 	enum ipe_op_type op;
diff --git a/security/ipe/fs.c b/security/ipe/fs.c
index dda7a5afc60c..0a1838432bd0 100644
--- a/security/ipe/fs.c
+++ b/security/ipe/fs.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ static struct dentry *np __ro_after_init;
 static struct dentry *root __ro_after_init;
 struct dentry *policy_root __ro_after_init;
 static struct dentry *audit_node __ro_after_init;
+static struct dentry *enforce_node __ro_after_init;
 
 /**
  * setaudit - Write handler for the securityfs node, "ipe/success_audit"
@@ -67,6 +68,60 @@ static ssize_t getaudit(struct file *f, char __user *data,
 	return simple_read_from_buffer(data, len, offset, result, 1);
 }
 
+/**
+ * setenforce - Write handler for the securityfs node, "ipe/enforce"
+ * @f: Supplies a file structure representing the securityfs node.
+ * @data: Supplies a buffer passed to the write syscall.
+ * @len: Supplies the length of @data.
+ * @offset: unused.
+ *
+ * Return:
+ * * >0	- Success, Length of buffer written
+ * * <0	- Error
+ */
+static ssize_t setenforce(struct file *f, const char __user *data,
+			  size_t len, loff_t *offset)
+{
+	int rc = 0;
+	bool new_value, old_value;
+
+	if (!file_ns_capable(f, &init_user_ns, CAP_MAC_ADMIN))
+		return -EPERM;
+
+	old_value = READ_ONCE(enforce);
+	rc = kstrtobool_from_user(data, len, &new_value);
+	if (rc)
+		return rc;
+
+	if (new_value != old_value) {
+		ipe_audit_enforce(new_value, old_value);
+		WRITE_ONCE(enforce, new_value);
+	}
+
+	return len;
+}
+
+/**
+ * getenforce - Read handler for the securityfs node, "ipe/enforce"
+ * @f: Supplies a file structure representing the securityfs node.
+ * @data: Supplies a buffer passed to the read syscall.
+ * @len: Supplies the length of @data.
+ * @offset: unused.
+ *
+ * Return:
+ * * >0	- Success, Length of buffer written
+ * * <0	- Error
+ */
+static ssize_t getenforce(struct file *f, char __user *data,
+			  size_t len, loff_t *offset)
+{
+	const char *result;
+
+	result = ((READ_ONCE(enforce)) ? "1" : "0");
+
+	return simple_read_from_buffer(data, len, offset, result, 1);
+}
+
 /**
  * new_policy - Write handler for the securityfs node, "ipe/new_policy".
  * @f: Supplies a file structure representing the securityfs node.
@@ -120,6 +175,11 @@ static const struct file_operations audit_fops = {
 	.read = getaudit,
 };
 
+static const struct file_operations enforce_fops = {
+	.write = setenforce,
+	.read = getenforce,
+};
+
 /**
  * ipe_init_securityfs - Initialize IPE's securityfs tree at fsinit.
  *
@@ -147,6 +207,13 @@ static int __init ipe_init_securityfs(void)
 		goto err;
 	}
 
+	enforce_node = securityfs_create_file("enforce", 0600, root, NULL,
+					      &enforce_fops);
+	if (IS_ERR(enforce_node)) {
+		rc = PTR_ERR(enforce_node);
+		goto err;
+	}
+
 	policy_root = securityfs_create_dir("policies", root);
 	if (IS_ERR(policy_root)) {
 		rc = PTR_ERR(policy_root);
@@ -163,6 +230,7 @@ static int __init ipe_init_securityfs(void)
 err:
 	securityfs_remove(np);
 	securityfs_remove(policy_root);
+	securityfs_remove(enforce_node);
 	securityfs_remove(audit_node);
 	securityfs_remove(root);
 	return rc;
-- 
2.25.1

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-04 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-04 22:09 [RFC PATCH v11 00/19] Integrity Policy Enforcement LSM (IPE) Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09 ` [dm-devel] " Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09 ` [RFC PATCH v11 01/19] security: add ipe lsm Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09   ` [dm-devel] " Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09 ` [RFC PATCH v11 02/19] ipe: add policy parser Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09   ` [dm-devel] " Fan Wu
2023-10-24  3:52   ` [PATCH RFC v11 2/19] " Paul Moore
2023-10-24  3:52     ` Paul Moore
2023-10-25 22:45     ` Fan Wu
2023-10-25 22:45       ` Fan Wu
2023-10-26 21:36       ` Paul Moore
2023-10-26 21:36         ` Paul Moore
2023-10-04 22:09 ` [RFC PATCH v11 03/19] ipe: add evaluation loop Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09   ` [dm-devel] " Fan Wu
2023-10-24  3:52   ` [PATCH RFC v11 3/19] " Paul Moore
2023-10-24  3:52     ` Paul Moore
2023-10-26  0:15     ` Fan Wu
2023-10-26  0:15       ` Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09 ` [RFC PATCH v11 04/19] ipe: add LSM hooks on execution and kernel read Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09   ` [dm-devel] " Fan Wu
2023-10-05  8:24   ` kernel test robot
2023-10-24  3:52   ` [PATCH RFC v11 4/19] " Paul Moore
2023-10-24  3:52     ` Paul Moore
2023-10-04 22:09 ` [RFC PATCH v11 05/19] ipe: introduce 'boot_verified' as a trust provider Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09   ` [dm-devel] " Fan Wu
2023-10-24  3:52   ` [PATCH RFC v11 5/19] " Paul Moore
2023-10-24  3:52     ` Paul Moore
2023-10-26 21:33     ` Fan Wu
2023-10-26 21:33       ` Fan Wu
2023-10-26 22:12       ` Paul Moore
2023-10-26 22:12         ` Paul Moore
2023-11-02 22:46         ` Fan Wu
2023-11-03 22:15           ` Paul Moore
2023-11-03 22:30             ` Paul Moore
2023-10-04 22:09 ` [RFC PATCH v11 06/19] security: add new securityfs delete function Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09   ` [dm-devel] " Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09 ` [RFC PATCH v11 07/19] ipe: add userspace interface Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09   ` [dm-devel] " Fan Wu
2023-10-05 10:32   ` kernel test robot
2023-10-24  3:52   ` [PATCH RFC v11 7/19] " Paul Moore
2023-10-04 22:09 ` [RFC PATCH v11 08/19] uapi|audit|ipe: add ipe auditing support Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09   ` [dm-devel] " Fan Wu
2023-10-05 13:00   ` kernel test robot
2023-10-24  3:52   ` [PATCH RFC v11 8/19] " Paul Moore
2023-10-24  3:52     ` Paul Moore
2023-11-02 22:55     ` Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09 ` Fan Wu [this message]
2023-10-04 22:09   ` [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH v11 09/19] ipe: add permissive toggle Fan Wu
2023-10-24  3:52   ` [PATCH RFC v11 9/19] " Paul Moore
2023-10-24  3:52     ` Paul Moore
2023-11-02 22:56     ` Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09 ` [RFC PATCH v11 10/19] block|security: add LSM blob to block_device Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09   ` [dm-devel] " Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09 ` [RFC PATCH v11 11/19] dm verity: set DM_TARGET_SINGLETON feature flag Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09   ` [dm-devel] " Fan Wu
2023-10-24  3:52   ` [PATCH RFC " Paul Moore
2023-10-24  3:52     ` Paul Moore
2023-11-02  0:40     ` Paul Moore
2023-10-04 22:09 ` [RFC PATCH v11 12/19] dm: add finalize hook to target_type Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09   ` [dm-devel] " Fan Wu
2023-10-24  3:52   ` [PATCH RFC " Paul Moore
2023-10-24  3:52     ` Paul Moore
2023-11-02  0:41     ` Paul Moore
2023-10-04 22:09 ` [RFC PATCH v11 13/19] dm verity: consume root hash digest and signature data via LSM hook Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09   ` [dm-devel] " Fan Wu
2023-10-24  3:52   ` [PATCH RFC " Paul Moore
2023-10-24  3:52     ` Paul Moore
2023-11-02  0:41     ` Paul Moore
2023-10-04 22:09 ` [RFC PATCH v11 14/19] ipe: add support for dm-verity as a trust provider Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09   ` [dm-devel] " Fan Wu
2023-10-24  3:52   ` [PATCH RFC " Paul Moore
2023-10-24  3:52     ` Paul Moore
2023-11-02 22:40     ` Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09 ` [RFC PATCH v11 15/19] fsverity: consume builtin signature via LSM hook Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09   ` [dm-devel] " Fan Wu
2023-10-05  2:27   ` Eric Biggers
2023-10-05  2:27     ` [dm-devel] " Eric Biggers
2023-10-05  2:49     ` Fan Wu
2023-10-05  2:49       ` [dm-devel] " Fan Wu
2023-10-24  3:52   ` [PATCH RFC " Paul Moore
2023-10-24  3:52     ` Paul Moore
2023-11-02  0:40     ` Paul Moore
2023-11-02  2:53       ` Eric Biggers
2023-11-02 15:42         ` Paul Moore
2023-11-02 19:33           ` Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09 ` [RFC PATCH v11 16/19] ipe: enable support for fs-verity as a trust provider Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09   ` [dm-devel] " Fan Wu
2023-10-04 23:58   ` Randy Dunlap
2023-10-04 23:58     ` [dm-devel] " Randy Dunlap
2023-10-05  2:45     ` Fan Wu
2023-10-05  2:45       ` [dm-devel] " Fan Wu
2023-10-24  3:52   ` [PATCH RFC " Paul Moore
2023-10-24  3:52     ` Paul Moore
2023-10-04 22:09 ` [RFC PATCH v11 17/19] scripts: add boot policy generation program Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09   ` [dm-devel] " Fan Wu
2023-10-24  3:52   ` [PATCH RFC " Paul Moore
2023-10-24  3:52     ` Paul Moore
2023-11-02 23:09     ` Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09 ` [RFC PATCH v11 18/19] ipe: kunit test for parser Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09   ` [dm-devel] " Fan Wu
2023-10-24  3:52   ` [PATCH RFC " Paul Moore
2023-10-24  3:52     ` Paul Moore
2023-11-02 23:11     ` Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09 ` [RFC PATCH v11 19/19] documentation: add ipe documentation Fan Wu
2023-10-04 22:09   ` [dm-devel] " Fan Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1696457386-3010-10-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=wufan@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=audit@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.