From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org,
linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@m17n.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk,
parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-390@vm.marist.edu, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:10:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041021001041.GI995@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041020164144.3457eafe.davem@davemloft.net>
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 04:41:44PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:25:09 +0200
> Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > IMHO breaking the build unnecessarily is extremly bad because
> > it will prevent all testing. And would you really want to hold
> > up the whole linux testing machinery just for some obscure
> > system call? IMHO not a good tradeoff.
>
> Then change the unistd.h cookie from "#error" to a "#warning". It
> accomplishes both of our goals.
#warnings would be fine for me.
-Andi
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org,
linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@m17n.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk,
parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-390@vm.marist.edu, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 02:10:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041021001041.GI995@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041020164144.3457eafe.davem@davemloft.net>
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 04:41:44PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:25:09 +0200
> Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > IMHO breaking the build unnecessarily is extremly bad because
> > it will prevent all testing. And would you really want to hold
> > up the whole linux testing machinery just for some obscure
> > system call? IMHO not a good tradeoff.
>
> Then change the unistd.h cookie from "#error" to a "#warning". It
> accomplishes both of our goals.
#warnings would be fine for me.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-21 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-20 14:44 [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs David Howells
2004-10-20 14:44 ` David Howells
2004-10-20 15:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-20 15:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-20 17:50 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-20 17:50 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-20 18:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-20 18:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-20 15:49 ` [parisc-linux] " Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-20 15:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-10-20 16:16 ` David Howells
2004-10-20 16:16 ` David Howells
2004-10-20 16:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-10-21 3:14 ` [uClinux-dev] " Greg Ungerer
2004-10-20 17:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2004-10-20 17:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2004-10-20 22:01 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-20 22:01 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-20 22:56 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2004-10-20 22:56 ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-20 23:04 ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 David S. Miller
2004-10-20 23:04 ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs David S. Miller
2004-10-20 23:25 ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-20 23:25 ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-20 23:41 ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 David S. Miller
2004-10-20 23:41 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-20 23:41 ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs David S. Miller
2004-10-20 23:41 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-21 0:10 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2004-10-21 0:10 ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-21 8:03 ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-10-21 8:03 ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-10-21 1:55 ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-21 1:55 ` [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-10-21 8:47 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-10-21 8:47 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041021001041.GI995@wotan.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=linux-390@vm.marist.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-sh@m17n.org \
--cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.