From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Rohit Seth <rohit.seth@intel.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Clean up of __alloc_pages
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:28:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051031132820.62a18822.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1130793655.4853.41.camel@akash.sc.intel.com>
Rohit wrote:
> Not sure why? Let me see if some new values could better articulate the
> meaning.
See also Nick's comments, before going too far. He was advocating
just using binary flags and adding a gfp_high flag, or something
like that.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Rohit Seth <rohit.seth@intel.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Clean up of __alloc_pages
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:28:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051031132820.62a18822.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1130793655.4853.41.camel@akash.sc.intel.com>
Rohit wrote:
> Not sure why? Let me see if some new values could better articulate the
> meaning.
See also Nick's comments, before going too far. He was advocating
just using binary flags and adding a gfp_high flag, or something
like that.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-31 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-29 1:33 [PATCH]: Clean up of __alloc_pages Rohit, Seth
2005-10-29 1:33 ` Rohit, Seth
2005-10-29 2:33 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-29 2:33 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-31 20:55 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-31 20:55 ` Rohit Seth
2005-11-01 1:14 ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-01 1:14 ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-04 18:15 ` Rohit Seth
2005-11-04 18:15 ` Rohit Seth
2005-11-05 0:00 ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-05 0:00 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-30 0:16 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 0:16 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-31 19:09 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-31 19:09 ` Rohit Seth
2005-11-05 17:09 ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-05 17:09 ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-06 4:18 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-06 4:18 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-06 17:35 ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-06 17:35 ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-06 20:49 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-06 20:49 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-07 2:57 ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-07 2:57 ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-07 3:42 ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-07 3:42 ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-07 4:37 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-07 4:37 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-07 6:08 ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-07 6:08 ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-07 9:46 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-07 9:46 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-07 10:17 ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-07 10:17 ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-07 14:41 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-07 14:41 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-07 3:44 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-07 3:44 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 1:47 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 1:47 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 2:01 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-30 2:01 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-30 2:19 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 2:19 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 2:32 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-30 2:32 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-30 3:06 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 3:06 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 3:53 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-30 3:53 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-30 2:26 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 2:26 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 2:36 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-30 2:36 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-30 3:09 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 3:09 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 3:55 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-30 3:55 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-30 4:11 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 4:11 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-31 21:20 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-31 21:20 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-31 21:28 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2005-10-31 21:28 ` Paul Jackson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-05 1:57 Seth, Rohit
2005-11-05 1:57 ` Seth, Rohit
2005-10-01 19:00 Seth, Rohit
2005-10-01 19:00 ` Seth, Rohit
2005-10-02 3:09 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-02 3:09 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-03 16:50 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-03 16:50 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-03 15:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-10-03 15:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-10-03 16:55 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-03 16:55 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-03 16:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-10-03 16:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-10-03 17:48 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-03 17:48 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-04 13:27 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-04 13:27 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-04 16:26 ` Ray Bryant
2005-10-04 16:26 ` Ray Bryant
2005-10-04 16:10 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-10-04 16:10 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-10-04 17:02 ` Ray Bryant
2005-10-04 17:02 ` Ray Bryant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051031132820.62a18822.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=rohit.seth@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.